VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,8/10
717
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Gli scienziati ci portano in un viaggio per esplorare insieme alcuni dei più incredibili fenomeni della Terra.Gli scienziati ci portano in un viaggio per esplorare insieme alcuni dei più incredibili fenomeni della Terra.Gli scienziati ci portano in un viaggio per esplorare insieme alcuni dei più incredibili fenomeni della Terra.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
Some of the newer series interesting with geographical features seen form space and explained or theorised.
Why is Nick Pope shown as a Military Analyst in the series?
He was not a military analyst. Mr Pope was the most junior grade manager in the MoD/ civil service. For 3 years he ran the MoD so called 'UFO desk' with a clerk. They collected public inquiries/sightings about UFOs. Any sightings requiring complex & thorough investigation would have been referred upwards to military etc. Mr Pope did not retire from the MoD but left to pursue a career as a UFO pundit with having worked at the MoD as a useful connection.
Why is Nick Pope shown as a Military Analyst in the series?
He was not a military analyst. Mr Pope was the most junior grade manager in the MoD/ civil service. For 3 years he ran the MoD so called 'UFO desk' with a clerk. They collected public inquiries/sightings about UFOs. Any sightings requiring complex & thorough investigation would have been referred upwards to military etc. Mr Pope did not retire from the MoD but left to pursue a career as a UFO pundit with having worked at the MoD as a useful connection.
I think all the "scientists" are hired actors. Used to be 1 of my favourite series in Discovery Science, but at 1 point when I realised that the "experts" are contradicting themselves (1st they present a theory, then another, then eventually the very same "expert" is the 1 who explains the real cause of the said phenomenon) that is when I thought that these are all staged.
Not sure if they are filming this in a library or something, but Mike Caps for example, whispers the entire show. Every single statement from him. Whisper. He's not the only one. Nearly every single "expert" does it. Annoying.
Everyone above this comment hit the nail on the head. This is a waste of time to anyone truly interested in science. The ridiculous argument before explaining what is obvious to a lot of learned people is really insulting. I was watching another show called NASA's Unexplained Files and the premise was as ridiculous as the one for What on earth, checked out the production company... guess what?? same guy... When I'm looking on the program guide and see these two programs I feel sad because the channels that are normally watch for science stories and interesting stuff are busy showing this garbage. I guess it's a cheap show and that's why they use it, I don't know. Here's is to missing The Learning Channel 20 years ago when it started (The Operation anyone? that was so cool!!). I guess everything gets lowered to the minimum common denominator or whatever sells to the masses... really sad.
This show has great locations but please the way you zero in on the location treats average people like they are dumb. The episode that had Centrailia Pennsylvania in it you used Fort Detrick as a suspect and one on a video of a sea monster in norway i think you cited aan old nazi sub's torpedo this is crazy. People who watch the show are pretty knowledgable to begin with. Please look at this thank you
Lo sapevi?
- Colonne sonoreFinding Clues
Written by Miguel Moreno
"Ancient Thought"
Written by Miguel Moreno
"Adios Bolero"
Written by Miguel Moreno
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- What on Earth?
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 44min
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 16:9 HD
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti