[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
Indietro
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro
Terror Birds (2016)

Recensioni degli utenti

Terror Birds

16 recensioni
4/10

Well, it was watchable, just keep your expectations low...

Given the title of the movie, "Terror Birds", you know exactly what you are getting yourself into when you sit down to watch a movie like this. But still, I did so, because once in a while a couple of these creature features actually turn out to be surprisingly good and entertaining...

..."Terror Birds" wasn't one of those times!

While the movie definitely was entertaining enough, for what it was of course, then it was also horrible generic in terms of how movies of this particular type goes. It followed a very straight forward script, but also one that was so mundane that it sort of felt like it was running on autopilot, and it offered very little to the audience.

The idea of the movie was adequate, although it didn't make sense about the acquisition of the birds or how they would come to be alive. But hey, science facts is hardly the crucial ingredient in a movie such as this. But at least serve the audience something that passes as just an ounce of believable or agreeable.

Creature features such as "Terror Bird" needs to have either realistic practical effects or really good CGI effects. "Terror Birds" had none of this. The CGI animated birds were just not believable, it looked too fake. And the CGI animated blood in some scenes was just atrocious to bear witness to. And bad CGI in a creature feature drags the movie down, far, far down.

As for the acting in "Terror Birds", well... First of all, I wasn't familiar with anyone here, and I consider that to be a good thing. I enjoy watching unfamiliar faces on the screen, because then I don't associate them with previously portrayed characters from other movies. However, the actors and actresses here had so little to work with that they were indeed fighting and losing a steep uphill battle.

I managed to sit through "Terror Birds", as it was sort of pseudo-entertaining, albeit a less than mediocre movie experience. It is not a movie that I will be watching a second time, that's for sure.
  • paul_m_haakonsen
  • 16 mag 2019
  • Permalink
4/10

Hilariously cheesy

  • Leofwine_draca
  • 19 dic 2018
  • Permalink
3/10

Phorusrhacidae

When a birdwatcher goes missing his daughter and her college buddies go looking for him in the Texan backwoods, or something. Then they get killed off, one by one and stuff by Phorusrhacidae, or Terror Birds as they are better know. A rich, ruthless man is attempting to breed them, no matter what the cost. It goes without saying that this is yet another cheap and very cheesy horror/monster flick, complete with wooden acting, silly plot and crap CGI. However this film has its tongue planted firmly in cheek, it is as much a comedy as it is a horror movie and to be fair it is reasonably funny at times. Not a total waste of my time and money, I was expecting worse and I now know what a Terror Bird is!
  • Stevieboy666
  • 13 mag 2019
  • Permalink
3/10

A perfectly mediocre flick

  • jamcam09
  • 17 mar 2020
  • Permalink
4/10

Watchable

A group of whiny thirty-something college students go in search of one their dads who went missing on a heavily fortified ranch, probably to escape from his whiny daughter and her whiny friends. During the course of the investigation they whine their way onto the ranch and come whiny face to beak with the titular large birds.

Watchable, but just barely. Take away the incessant whining and you would have a decent 1950's large animal movie worth six stars. But with all the whining, four stars is generous.
  • bitbucketchip
  • 6 ago 2022
  • Permalink
4/10

Typical scifi

Very cheesy, with a fair amount of Gore. If that's what you're looking for this is for you. Personally sorry to see Greg Evigan Reduced to having to do this kind of thing for a paycheck. But it's a gig right ?
  • bl-63974
  • 25 gen 2020
  • Permalink
5/10

Fantastic Bad CheesyMovie

Big birds, insane philanthropists and cheesy acting.

The movie is fun, will a cast who seems to understand they are making a B Grade movie.
  • Dark_Lord_Mark
  • 18 feb 2019
  • Permalink
1/10

I was surprised..........

.......that this was not another syfy channel flick! I "saw" this as a double feature with sharktopus vs pteracuda... At least s vs p had conan o' brien in it! I am still trying to determine if birdemic is better than terrorbird. 'nuff said....
  • ac-44715
  • 29 giu 2020
  • Permalink
3/10

About the movie, not about water

This movie happens in Texas. Its about interpersonal relationships between adults. Also its about prehistoric animals, terror birds specifically, and maybe they got interpersonal relationships as well, birds are more intelligent than we give them credit. Now this point is not really relevant to the movie, I'm just throwing it in here to fill up space but also it's just interesting- all the water in the world is the same water that's ever been here, it's the same water all through out time, like its eternal, changing form constantly but never departing from the earth. Okay, back to the movie- some of the characters in the course of the movie are slain by the terror birds. If our bodies are mostly made of water, even after our bodies have gone, the water that made up our bodies will remain.
  • jessegehrig
  • 21 giu 2020
  • Permalink
3/10

Wow. It's BJ McKay And His Best Friend CGI Bird.

And some horrific CGI Birds they are. The CGI is just terrible. But at least it's better than Peter Jackson's flapping at the air King Kong CGI. A silly story here about 2 killer ostriches that go on the rampage in BJ McKays bird sanctuary. I made it to the end, barely. What a lamer. But it avoids the 2 thanks to the security guy who ALMOST made it to the end. 3/10.
  • wandernn1-81-683274
  • 7 mar 2022
  • Permalink
8/10

Could be true...

The plot is fairly simple: a bird-watcher investigates sounds coming from a ranch where a greedy rancher possesses some prehistoric birds he recently found on a desolate island. After some time, bird-watcher's daughter begins to worry because he has not returned home, but she and friends are able to trace his whereabouts via GPS. The best parts of the movie are the special effects, because when the birds interact with humans, they appear very fleshly and real. The actors are easy on the eyes and act well, except for the annoying feature of many horror movies: when victims should run away...they don't...Ugh! Since the story line contains a possibility of truth (whales, for example, are survivors of prehistoric times; so, there could be a possibility that some unknown prehistoric creatures are at uncharted areas), the movie has credibility and thus is interesting. The TV version silences the obvious profanities (via moving lips) in the movie. That makes it easy on the ears. I gave it an 8/10.
  • because-of-him
  • 9 ott 2017
  • Permalink
7/10

Far better than it should be but still somewhat flawed

Attempting to find her missing father, a woman and her friends head out to his secluded ranch in the wilderness to look for him, finally coming across another isolated farmhouse housing a doctor's secret collection of vicious terror birds and must find a way to get away alive.

Overall, this one was quite fun for what it's trying to do. One of it's better features here is the fun setup that emerges here to have the birds get loose in the facility. The idea of the facility being based to study the creatures in secrecy after being discovered on the expedition, out in the middle of the woods and filled with plenty of security and secrecy serves as an appropriate launching pad for what's going on here. The scientists' discovery of the site results in a fantastic attack scene that gives this one the impetus for its true plotline of having the kids coming to look after him and get caught up in the same mess he did. Likewise, with them completely unaware of their existence and no one being forced to explain why these creatures are still alive so we're spared that kind of useless padding that typically fills these kinds of films. That also brings up the series of fun attacks by the killer birds which is rather enjoyable throughout here. The initial attack by the birds while being released from their transport vessel makes for a strong opening here, and the fateful attack that brings the kids into the storyline has a modicum of suspense with the desire to get him out of their corral before the creatures get to him. Later on, when the group arrives and the realize the creatures are there really starts this one going with a relentless series of attacks and encounters that builds up the pacing far more than before. With attacks and chases throughout the corral as well as interference with the other guards attempting to kill them without getting their hands dirty and trying to force the birds to actually deliver the killing blow which is a rather unique tactic, giving off some great action of the dwindling survivors trying to get off the ranch. As these provide enough gore to stay interesting during this section and showing off the great design of the birds, these here are what make this one enjoyable. There are some issues with this one. One of the biggest issues with this one is the rather unnecessary padding that is quite prominent in the first half of the film. There's plenty of subplots in this one, namely the series of arguments over the ethical treatment of the birds and what's going to happen to them following the accidentally killing of the father in the compound which is completely overbearing and mishandled with the way he disregards everything like always in these kinds of films. As is the case with the constantly-complaining sorority queen that joins them on the expedition to look after her boyfriend that has no business being out there or a subplot featuring some stranger following them for retribution after insulting him as these two plot-points make this one take longer than necessary to get to the creature action. The birds are distractingly CGI but it's not detrimental which is perfectly fine for this kind of film and really amount to its only real flaws.

Rated Unrated/R: Graphic Violence and Graphic Language.
  • kannibalcorpsegrinder
  • 12 ott 2019
  • Permalink
6/10

Welcome to the food chain

  • nogodnomasters
  • 9 gen 2018
  • Permalink
6/10

"All it takes is one bad egg."

Two outsized birds escape captivity and cause CGI havoc amongst a cast who appear to be having a great time. Such ebullience is addictive, and if you're in the mood, this is pretty good fun, on a strictly Scooby-Doo level.

Dumb adults and funny, smart-arse cute teens (of whom, my favourite might well be constantly sniping Taylor - Lindsey Sporrer - the silliest of all) hog too much of the running time when what we really want to see is some decently rendered birds pecking some poor blighter to death. This being a fairly family 'friendly' ScyFy project, there are no profanities and nothing too shocking.

My score is 6 out of 10.
  • parry_na
  • 20 ago 2020
  • Permalink
7/10

low budget but fun

I like watching low budget dinosaur movies, and i like that this one uses Terror Birds (technically a dinosaur because birds are dinosaurs) instead of something more common / generic like a raptor.

A lot of the characters are unlikeable but they're here to get eaten by birds so its whatever.

The cgi is bad but thats part of my enjoyment, the walkcycle of the birds is very funny.
  • GhostieHowls
  • 20 ago 2025
  • Permalink
6/10

Is Heath Allyn related to an Estevez?

Terror Birds is one of those made for SyFy CG creature-fests which I don't actually remember being on that channel. If it had been I surely would have watched it. I had to buy a import DVD to see it because apparently it's too mediocre to release here. It is mediocre compared to many of these kind of films though superior to most recent Asylum stuff. The CG of the giant prehistoric birds known as Phorushacids is decent. There's a fair amount of mostly CG gore including eviscerations, decapitations and a highlight of a head getting cracked open on the top and then the bare skull and spine being ripped out together. There's also a small amount of practical wound effects which are well done. The star is the ever reliable Greg Evigan as a somewhat-sleazy prehistoric bird breeder. The rest of the cast is decent though the girls could have been cuter and one character being a token lesbian seemed pointless, at least the cast was 100% non-diverse for a change. Heath Allyn plays one of Evigan's henchmen and looks and sounds 100% like a lost son/cousin of Joe Estevez though there doesn't appear to be any relation. The whole film is played fairly light though not to a Sharknado degree and there's some comic relief here in the form of the annoying "hot" ditsy blonde girl. Being made for TV means there's no nudity or bad language though they do find an excuse to get the girls to strip down to their underwear. The only real disappointment here is there's only two giant birds and they don't rampage through a small town or anything. A good watch for fans of Flu Birds of Kaw.
  • milkhole213
  • 25 ott 2021
  • Permalink

Altro da questo titolo

Altre pagine da esplorare

Visti di recente

Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
Scarica l'app IMDb
Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
Segui IMDb sui social
Scarica l'app IMDb
Per Android e iOS
Scarica l'app IMDb
  • Aiuto
  • Indice del sito
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
  • Sala stampa
  • Pubblicità
  • Lavoro
  • Condizioni d'uso
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, una società Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.