[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario usciteI 250 migliori filmFilm più popolariCerca film per genereI migliori IncassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie filmIndia Film Spotlight
    Cosa c’è in TV e streamingLe 250 migliori serie TVSerie TV più popolariCerca serie TV per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareUltimi trailerOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcast IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsPremiazioniFestivalTutti gli eventi
    Nati oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona collaboratoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista dei Preferiti
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

Ouija: L'origine del male

Titolo originale: Ouija: Origin of Evil
  • 2016
  • VM14
  • 1h 39min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,2/10
79.367
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
POPOLARITÀ
3262
552
Doug Jones and Lulu Wilson in Ouija: L'origine del male (2016)
In 1967 Los Angeles, a widowed mother and her two daughters add a new stunt to bolster their seance scam business and unwittingly invite authentic evil into their home. When the youngest daughter is overtaken by a merciless spirit, the family confronts unthinkable fears to save her and send her possessor back to the other side.
Riproduci trailer2: 36
34 video
99+ foto
Psychological DramaSupernatural HorrorDramaHorrorMysteryThriller

Los Angeles, 1967. Una madre vedova e le figlie introducono un nuovo espediente per potenziare la propria attività di frodi spiritiche invitando una presenza malvagia in casa loro, senza ren... Leggi tuttoLos Angeles, 1967. Una madre vedova e le figlie introducono un nuovo espediente per potenziare la propria attività di frodi spiritiche invitando una presenza malvagia in casa loro, senza rendersi conto di quanto sia pericolosa.Los Angeles, 1967. Una madre vedova e le figlie introducono un nuovo espediente per potenziare la propria attività di frodi spiritiche invitando una presenza malvagia in casa loro, senza rendersi conto di quanto sia pericolosa.

  • Regia
    • Mike Flanagan
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Mike Flanagan
    • Jeff Howard
    • Juliet Snowden
  • Star
    • Elizabeth Reaser
    • Lulu Wilson
    • Annalise Basso
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    6,2/10
    79.367
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    POPOLARITÀ
    3262
    552
    • Regia
      • Mike Flanagan
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Mike Flanagan
      • Jeff Howard
      • Juliet Snowden
    • Star
      • Elizabeth Reaser
      • Lulu Wilson
      • Annalise Basso
    • 287Recensioni degli utenti
    • 201Recensioni della critica
    • 65Metascore
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Premi
      • 2 vittorie e 7 candidature totali

    Video34

    Trailer #2
    Trailer 2:36
    Trailer #2
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:34
    Official Trailer
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:34
    Official Trailer
    How Doris Talks To Daddy
    Clip 0:49
    How Doris Talks To Daddy
    Take Her Voice Instead
    Clip 0:50
    Take Her Voice Instead
    Father Tom Explains His Theory
    Clip 1:02
    Father Tom Explains His Theory
    What Its Like To Be Strangled
    Clip 1:30
    What Its Like To Be Strangled

    Foto107

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 102
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali22

    Modifica
    Elizabeth Reaser
    Elizabeth Reaser
    • Alice Zander
    Lulu Wilson
    Lulu Wilson
    • Doris Zander
    Annalise Basso
    Annalise Basso
    • Lina Zander
    Henry Thomas
    Henry Thomas
    • Father Tom
    Parker Mack
    Parker Mack
    • Mikey
    Halle Charlton
    Halle Charlton
    • Ellie
    Alexis G. Zall
    Alexis G. Zall
    • Betty
    Doug Jones
    Doug Jones
    • Ghoul Marcus
    Kate Siegel
    Kate Siegel
    • Jenny Browning
    Sam Anderson
    Sam Anderson
    • Mr. Browning
    Chelsea Gonzalez
    Chelsea Gonzalez
    • Gloria
    Lincoln Melcher
    Lincoln Melcher
    • Jack
    Nicholas Keenan
    Nicholas Keenan
    • Walter
    Michael Weaver
    Michael Weaver
    • Roger Zander
    Ele Keats
    Ele Keats
    • Ellie's Mom
    Eve Gordon
    Eve Gordon
    • Joan
    Chad Heffelfinger
    Chad Heffelfinger
    • Male Ghoul
    Nina Mansker
    • Female Ghoul
    • Regia
      • Mike Flanagan
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Mike Flanagan
      • Jeff Howard
      • Juliet Snowden
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti287

    6,279.3K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    6spencergrande6

    Better Than It Has Any Right To Be, But Still...

    Mike Flanagan just gets so close yet again, yet falls disappointingly short. Oculus is still his best work, and the promise that both Hush and this prequel to a PG-13 board game prequel show, is that if given the right opportunity he might really be capable of a cold-blooded classic.

    This is a film that shouldn't exist, should never have gotten theatrical distribution and definitely shouldn't have attracted the likes of Flanagan (okay, he probably did this to increase his clout in the industry, but still). He musters some great work here, following familiar supernatural clichés but bringing his own touch to the proceedings.

    The setting is beautiful, the characters likable and not completely square. The atmosphere is given time to build, he luxuriates in teasing and messing with audience expectations (as a way of spiting this, and goosing the audience lulled into a slow burn placation, he includes an explosive scene wherein the actual demon is seen shoving his fist down the little girl's throat. It's both too much and a necessary jolt at the time, a conundrum if ever there was one and a small encapsulation of everything right and wrong within this film).

    It's too bad some of the nice work done in the first 2/3rds of the film is undone by a clichéd, boring, exorcism-lite finale. None of it is very scary, and it all has the feel of fitting into the "Ouija" franchise package, whatever in God's name that could mean. Considering the stakes here, what Flanagan does is still impressive.
    7Matt_Layden

    This prequel has no business being as good as it is.

    This prequel has no business being as good as it is. The first Ouija film came out in 2014 and quickly faded away into obscurity. So imagine my surprise when they decide to make a 'prequel' of all things. I hunch is that The Conjuring films have been pretty successful and they are set in the 70's, when things were a little creepier, no cell phones and genuine scary aesthetic. Imagine my surprise again when up and coming horror filmmakers Mike Flanagan was the man behind the camera. The underrated mirror horror flick Oculus and deaf home invasion flick Hush were two of his recent outings. Things were looking not too bad for this flick and to top it off, it received some pretty decent reviews.

    Alice and her two daughters run a scam business in which they "speak to the dead". The mother justifies this business by telling her youngest daughter, Doris, that it helps people move on and get closure. When her eldest, Lina, plays the new Ouija boardgames at a friends house, she tells her mother to incorporate it into her act. She does and things take a sinister turn when they scam becomes reality.

    It's hard to make a game board scary. The first film tried, failed and this one tries and succeeds for the most part. Any non-horror fan might balk at the idea that this film is good, but I consider this movie to be one of the most underrated flicks of the year. Flanagan knows how to build solid tension and he doesn't rely on cheap scares or an obscene amount of gore. This film has none of that. Careful framework and lighting is all he needs to create an unsettling atmosphere. Whenever someone decides to look through the ouija glass piece, you feel yourself tense up expecting something to happen.

    Kids in horror films are the go to for anything scary. Most movies tend to cast children horribly and they end of ruining the film. Doris, played by Lulu Wilson delivers an innocent and somewhat chilling performance as the youngest daughter. Her goodbye message to a young boy about what it feels like to be strangled to death is an excellent scene to send chills down your spine. No scary images, sounds or blood needed. Just a child delivering one monologue about suffocating you.

    Obviously the film is far from perfect, but it doesn't cater to the happy ending crowd either. It takes some chances and for the most part, lands them. I was surprised by how much I liked this film, which may be why the rating is higher than what others would tend to give a film like this. Had the first film never existed, this would be a bigger hit.
    6Echo9-71

    atmospheric horror that deserved a better-written ending

    This is an solid, slow-burn, atmospheric horror movie; well-paced capped off with a thrilling third act. It very effectively combines a simple plot, and natural characterization, with good acting and direction. The result is a compelling story that is believeable and susupenseful.

    At the end of the final act, I was thinking "high-fives all-around, good job guys" and was about to give this two thumbs up.

    And then, inexplicably, in the last 5 minutes the filmmakers revert to cheesy B-horror cliches making for a jarring denoument that simply feels wrong.

    WTF? Was that studio exec interference or just plain bad judgement? Nope. Because it's a prequel (to a movie I haven't seen yet), I guess it had to end with a bridge to the other movie. But it could have and should have been better, so the truth is, it's just bad writing. The last few minutes just don't match the tone or narrative arc of the first hour and a half, and it comes across feeling like a cheap add-on. Not a twist ("cool!"), or a surprise ("gotcha!") just lame ("seriously? Pffthtttt!") (That's the raspberry sound, BTW.)

    This movie should have wrapped up nicely at 1:27:25. If it had: 8/10.

    With the dopey last 4 and a half minutes added: 6/10.

    PS - If you can, stop watching at 1:27:25 and just imagine a better CODA; e.g., Lana, the sensible one, getting on with her life as best she can, and the Ouija board washing up on some beach like in Jumanji.
    7SnoopyStyle

    shockingly pretty good

    It's 1967 Los Angeles. Alice Zander (Elizabeth Reaser) runs a crooked spiritual reading business out of her home. She uses her daughters Lina (Annalise Basso) and younger Doris (Lulu Wilson) in operating her scams. They incorporate an Ouija board into their production. While trying to contact the girls' dead father, Doris seems to make real contact. Father Tom (Henry Thomas) is the headmaster of the girls' school. Mikey (Parker Mack) has a crush on Lina.

    Surprise! This is actually good. It is well-made. The characters are well-drawn and well-acted. I wouldn't say that this is breaking down any new walls but there is good in doing good work. I do have a couple of small nitpicks. For some reason, Alice and Father Tom go out for what looks like a fancy dinner. It almost looks like a date if it weren't for the characters. Second, I would keep the possibility that Doris is scamming everyone until further into the movie. It would be nice to have Father Tom uncover the whole situation as a reveal. The good are the actors, the mood, the simple premise, and good construction. It's a shocker that this is all pretty good.
    6Reno-Rangan

    So this is where it all began!

    It is a decent horror film, but surely better than the first. The previous part was an usual teen themed horror where everything started as a playful. But this one was a prequel and it focused on the origins. A single mother with two daughters is making money helping the people who want to contact their beloved dead ones. The things changes when her little daughter started to communicate the spirits of her own. The chaos unleashes, the house becomes haunted and the family begins to fall apart.

    Keeping it simple is what worked out well for the film, despite thematically borrowed from others, scenes were kind of familiar and characters intentionally developed. Particularly the priest role was the most overused in any horror film. Followed by the twist. That turning point was good, but not a new. Nice performances and well shot film. Ouija is a fine concept for a horror theme and with this film's somewhat success, I hope the next one would only get better. So it is worth a watch, if you're not anticipating a something special.

    6/10

    Altri elementi simili

    Ouija
    4,5
    Ouija
    Oculus - Il riflesso del male
    6,5
    Oculus - Il riflesso del male
    Somnia
    6,2
    Somnia
    Annabelle 2: Creation
    6,5
    Annabelle 2: Creation
    Lights Out - Terrore nel buio
    6,3
    Lights Out - Terrore nel buio
    La madre
    6,2
    La madre
    Il terrore del silenzio
    6,6
    Il terrore del silenzio
    Annabelle 3
    5,9
    Annabelle 3
    The Boy
    6,0
    The Boy
    Insidious 3 - L'inizio
    6,1
    Insidious 3 - L'inizio
    Annabelle
    5,5
    Annabelle
    Insidious
    6,8
    Insidious

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      The film was shot digitally, but director and editor Mike Flanagan, in order to add a retro feel to the film, added elements in post-production to give the appearance of a movie shot on film. Those include the 'cigarette burns', marks that appear every 20 minutes or so in the upper right corner of the frame, which were used to signal a change of reels for film projected.
    • Blooper
      In order to make the film appear more authentic for the time in which it is set (1967), cue marks, or "reel change" marks, are inserted at approximately every 20 minutes. However, the marks are oval when they should actually be circular, since this is a film presented in a 1.85:1 aspect ratio and not in a 2.39:1 aspect ratio. The only time the marks should be oval is if a film is projected with an anamorphic lens. On an anamorphic film print, the cue marks are circular, but the anamorphic lens makes the circle look like an oval when projected on a screen.
    • Citazioni

      Doris Zander: Wanna hear something cool?

      Mikey: Sure.

      Doris Zander: Do you know what it feels like to be strangled to death? First, you feel the pressure in your throat. Your eyes water, and you start to taste something very, very sour in your mouth. Then it's like someone lights a match right in the middle of your chest, and that fire grows. It fills your lungs, and your throat, and all the way behind your eyes. And finally, that fire turns to ice; like pins and needles of ice are sticking into your fingers, your toes, your arms. You see stars, then darkness. And the last thing you feel... is cold.

      [Mikey looks confused and horrified]

      Doris Zander: [smiles] Goodnight, Romeo.

    • Curiosità sui crediti
      There is a post-credits scene with Lin Shaye.
    • Connessioni
      Featured in FoundFlix: Ouija 2: Origin of Evil (2016) Ending Explained + Connections to the First Film (2016)
    • Colonne sonore
      You Gotta Move Me
      Written by Dennis Michael Lacey

      Performed by Mike Lacey

      Courtesy of Crucial Music Corporation

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti20

    • How long is Ouija: Origin of Evil?Powered by Alexa

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 27 ottobre 2016 (Italia)
    • Paese di origine
      • Stati Uniti
    • Siti ufficiali
      • Official Facebook
      • Official Instagram
    • Lingue
      • Inglese
      • Ucraino
    • Celebre anche come
      • Ouija: el origen del mal
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Clark Residences - 306 Loma Drive, Los Angeles, California, Stati Uniti(the girl's school)
    • Aziende produttrici
      • Universal Pictures
      • Platinum Dunes
      • Blumhouse Productions
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Botteghino

    Modifica
    • Budget
      • 9.000.000 USD (previsto)
    • Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 35.144.505 USD
    • Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 14.065.500 USD
      • 23 ott 2016
    • Lordo in tutto il mondo
      • 81.705.746 USD
    Vedi le informazioni dettagliate del botteghino su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      1 ora 39 minuti
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • Datasat
      • Dolby Digital
      • Dolby Atmos
      • DTS
      • SDDS
    • Proporzioni
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    Doug Jones and Lulu Wilson in Ouija: L'origine del male (2016)
    Divario superiore
    What was the official certification given to Ouija: L'origine del male (2016) in Japan?
    Rispondi
    • Visualizza altre lacune di informazioni
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.