VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,1/10
380
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Jamie Theakston tenta di scoprire la verità su misteri storici, antiche reliquie, tesori nascosti, teorie del complotto e civiltà perdute.Jamie Theakston tenta di scoprire la verità su misteri storici, antiche reliquie, tesori nascosti, teorie del complotto e civiltà perdute.Jamie Theakston tenta di scoprire la verità su misteri storici, antiche reliquie, tesori nascosti, teorie del complotto e civiltà perdute.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
These are not scholars, but actors whose presentations are dedicated to sensationalism, shock and self-promotion.
These self-styled "experts" are all over the map on any topic they choose for the week. Their technical background is nil. Their work experience in the topic is nil.
Even at the high school level, the most basic rules of scholarship require research, supporting authorities, reasoning and analysis. These hour long shows posture a lot but prove nothing. They pretend to be skilled experts on every topic under the sun - but they aren't even close.
So, before you waste even an hour on one of these shows, look up the backgrounds and histories of the presenters. Decide for yourself.
These self-styled "experts" are all over the map on any topic they choose for the week. Their technical background is nil. Their work experience in the topic is nil.
Even at the high school level, the most basic rules of scholarship require research, supporting authorities, reasoning and analysis. These hour long shows posture a lot but prove nothing. They pretend to be skilled experts on every topic under the sun - but they aren't even close.
So, before you waste even an hour on one of these shows, look up the backgrounds and histories of the presenters. Decide for yourself.
Such a disgusting and disgraceful program. Episode 6 season 7 is nothing but lies. All people do is criticize Christianity except other religions, jesus christ does exist and a this program is asking for trouble, you cannot insult Christianity with your opinions. They're sceptical and know nothing about anyone.
Pseudo-historic, non-scientific sensationalist garbage where non-experts, non-intellectual spew their garbage. Most of the times I avoid them but just today I decided to give them a chance because there was a topic about a famous German executioner Johann Reichhart, a person with an interesting story I was familiar with. I expected the episode to be over the top, wild, sensationalist and so I prepare myself to endure some stupid statements. But...I couldn't force myself to watch this for more than five minutes. Right from the start, they wanted to present this man as one of the worst monsters that ever lived, they instantly switched to Hitler's era and let mostly average but disturbingly uneducated people to drag on with their wild claims and stupid ideas about how life in Germany was during that time (who cares?. I stopped watching after a woman with bellow-average intelligence started making one irrelevant and silly statement after another with no end in sight. If Hitler's isn't involved, then it isn't interesting, right? 1 star for demonizing a man who had the most unpleasant job ever during a time where such a job was normal (in most of the world) and the method of execution the most humane option available. He didn't deserve it.
Tried watching ´Mystery of Yamashitas Treasure´. Couldn't take it anymore after being informed that the Japanese were. hiding gold and that some dude wasn't heard of for 4 years for about 50 times... over and over the same infos.
I've watched some of the episodes and fact checked them. Interesting story line, facts need to be checked. I like the enforcer/critic rolls, however, the research is incomplete, thus making what they state as fact, actually wrong in many ways. I encourage fact checking. Not even in the least, entertaining. While new information is coming to surface every day, if they are going to claim a fact of which falls under "common knowledge", at least get that right. It seems that they want to look like fools. To make a suggestion to them, fact check. I've always had to use multiple sources, do they? I'd love to pick on each episode individually, however, I'd be writing books, creating a redundancy of what is already readably available. Fact check. I'd give it a 0 out of 10 except that it is a conversation starter, and a bad one at that.
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniReferenced in Daily Brunch with Ocado: Episodio #1.16 (2014)
- Colonne sonoreAncient Thought
Written by Miguel Moreno
"Finding Clues" Written by Miguel Moreno
"Tunisia" Written by Miguel Moreno
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does Forbidden History have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti