Panama

2022
R
1h 35min

VALUTAZIONE IMDb

3,5/10

4325

LA TUA VALUTAZIONE

Mel Gibson and Cole Hauser in Panama (2022)

An ex-marine is hired by a defense contractor to travel to Panama to complete an arms deal. In the process he becomes involved with the U.S. invasion of Panama, and learns an important lesson about the true nature of political power.

Riproduci trailer1:50

2 video

92 foto

Thriller cospirativo Thriller politico Azione Thriller

Un ex marine impiegato da un appaltatore della difesa si reca a Panama per concludere un affare di armi e viene coinvolto nell'invasione statunitense di Panama. Impara una lezione importante... Leggi tuttoUn ex marine impiegato da un appaltatore della difesa si reca a Panama per concludere un affare di armi e viene coinvolto nell'invasione statunitense di Panama. Impara una lezione importante sulla vera natura del potere politico.Un ex marine impiegato da un appaltatore della difesa si reca a Panama per concludere un affare di armi e viene coinvolto nell'invasione statunitense di Panama. Impara una lezione importante sulla vera natura del potere politico.

Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro

VALUTAZIONE IMDb

3,5/10

4325

LA TUA VALUTAZIONE

Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro

Video2

Foto92

+ 86

Recensioni degli utenti111

3,54.3K

Recensioni in evidenza

3supermellowcali

Pretty bad

Not even Cole or Mel could save this unimaginative story with cliché cardboard characters and a freshman-level script. The dialog was remarkably poor, spotted with unnecessary narration and definitions and, of course, incompetent bad guys that have guns but attack with their hands, then miss every time by firing wildly. The pro-level production was wasted on this borefest.

5eongamerdude

Not as bad as they say but not that good either

Not nearly a 3 score for me. More like 5.

Then again, I personally am not a hater and dislike every film.

The film has major flaws. But Mel Gibson and Cole Hauser are awesome.

I think it was marketed so badly because it leads you to believe it's more action than it really is.

It's espionage and a little bit of action.

This is a turn-your-brain-off film.

I recommend for fans of Cole Hauser.

5/10.

1confidential-67897

Shockingly terrible

Only watched because I like Cole in Yellowstone. Where do I start, load music played over every conversation, you can't hear a word people are saying. It looks like it may been filmed using an iPhone 1, camera is constantly shaking. No plot to speak of, but that may be because I had to stop watching 30 mins in. Do not waste your time.

1paulmckeown-11060

Terrible movie, waste of time

Where was the plot, the story was all over the place and the acting woeful ,why was this even made...a low budget film not worthy of being on the screen, avoid at all cost.

3dongillette1

Bush League

The one thing I can say about Mel Gibson is that unlike Bruce Willis, he still brings his "A" game when he's trying to make a buck, but the rest of these no-acting clowns wouldn't make it in a high school play.

Really amateurish acting, stupid effects in the fight scenes, and chock full of goofy, you should steer clear of this one.

Trama

Modifica

Lo sapevi?

Modifica

Quiz
Morgan Freeman and Frank Grillo were originally cast.

Blooper
The plot partially revolves around the purchase of a soviet helicopter, but the helicopter that eventually is shown is an American Blackhawk.

Citazioni
Stark: Let me tell you something: There's nothing more rock N Roll than takin out the bad guys for the Red, White and Blue.

Curiosità sui crediti
The credits run for nearly 5 minutes.

Versioni alternative
The UK release was cut, cut required to remove a scene of deliberate animal cruelty staged for the film, in order to obtain a 15 classification. Cut was made in accordance with BBFC Guidelines, policy, and the Cinematograph Films (Animals) Act, 1937, which is applied in accordance with the Video Recordings Act, 1984. An uncut classification was not available.