[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
SpelingError की प्रोफ़ाइल इमेज

SpelingError

मई 2014 को शामिल हुए
My Rating System:

1/10 - 4/10 = Negative
5/10 = Average
6/10 - 10/10 = Positive

*Depending on the degree of the flaw, a film can be marked down more than one point.

1/10: No matter how hard I try, I can't think of anything I liked about these movies whatsoever.

2/10: Movies with this rating barely have anything I liked about them. Sometimes, the only thing I can say I liked are a few minor things. However, I can't say I liked nothing about these movies.

3/10: Movies with this rating have a couple solid aspects I liked. However, the bad outweighs the good quite a bit.

4/10: Movies with this rating have several things I disliked and a fair amount of things I liked. However, the bad slightly outweighs the good and I wouldn't say they're average or okay.

5/10: Movies with this rating may have a few flaws, but there are just enough things I like about them for me not to consider them to be bad films. I wouldn't say I liked them though.

6/10: I like movies which get this rating. They may have a few flaws, but overall, I find these movies to be pretty good. I have little issue with revisiting these movies as long as it's only a few spread out viewings.

7/10: I really like movies which receive this rating. Movies with this rating usually have only one thing I disliked about them or a few minor things I disliked. I'd be okay with revisiting these movies every now and then.

8/10: I can't find anything major I disliked about these films. There may be one or two minor issues I had, but they're usually insignificant when factored against everything I liked about them. These movies may not give me a feeling of "I couldn't have enjoyed this any more". However, I have no issue with revisiting them as my opinion may possibly grow.

9/10: Like films I give 8/10 to, I can't find anything I disliked about these movies as well. I also don't have any minor issues with them. However, what sets these films apart from films I give 8/10 to is that I find more merits with them and feel a far greater connection to them. They still don't give me a sense of perfection, but they sure come close to doing so.

*A film has to be at least one year old to receive this rating.

10/10: I can't think of anything I disliked about these movies. Not only do I think these movies are perfect, but I also think they're untouchable and awe-inspiring. I doubt I could've enjoyed them anymore.

*A film has to be at least five years old and I have to watch it at least twice for it to receive this rating.
नई प्रोफ़ाइल में आपका स्वागत है
हमारे अपडेट अभी भी डेवलप हो रहे हैं. हालांकि प्रोफ़ाइलका पिछला संस्करण अब उपलब्ध नहीं है, हम सक्रिय रूप से सुधारों पर काम कर रहे हैं, और कुछ अनुपलब्ध सुविधाएं जल्द ही वापस आ जाएंगी! उनकी वापसी के लिए हमारे साथ बने रहें। इस बीच, रेटिंग विश्लेषण अभी भी हमारे iOS और Android ऐप्स पर उपलब्ध है, जो प्रोफ़ाइल पेज पर पाया जाता है. वर्ष और शैली के अनुसार अपने रेटिंग वितरण (ओं) को देखने के लिए, कृपया हमारा नया हेल्प गाइड देखें.

बैज4

बैज कमाने का तरीका जानने के लिए, यहां बैज सहायता पेज जाएं.
बैज एक्सप्लोर करें

रेटिंग4.7 हज़ार

SpelingErrorकी रेटिंग
Under the Skin
6.58
Under the Skin
Yellow Submarine
7.48
Yellow Submarine
Under the Volcano
6.87
Under the Volcano
The Iron Horse
7.27
The Iron Horse
15/67: TV
3.98
15/67: TV
Wise Blood
6.96
Wise Blood
Zoolander
6.56
Zoolander
Two Years at Sea
6.88
Two Years at Sea
6.08
Messe noire
Jim le glisseur
6.78
Jim le glisseur
Pacific 231
6.87
Pacific 231
Moy zelenyy krokodil
7.08
Moy zelenyy krokodil
Variations on a Cellophane Wrapper
6.18
Variations on a Cellophane Wrapper
Ride on a Runaway Train
6.67
Ride on a Runaway Train
Phantom
6.36
Phantom
Few of Us
7.18
Few of Us
Victim
7.77
Victim
White Hole
6.57
White Hole
6.46
Amor Pedestre
Odin's Shield Maiden
6.28
Odin's Shield Maiden
The 3 Rs
6.18
The 3 Rs
Nowa ksiazka
7.27
Nowa ksiazka
बुलिट
7.48
बुलिट
Guide
8.37
Guide
The Vanishing Lady
5.96
The Vanishing Lady

वॉचलिस्ट1

Stalker
8.0
Stalker

सूचियां1

  • Nikolay Grinko, Aleksandr Kaydanovskiy, and Anatoliy Solonitsyn in Stalker (1979)
    brianberta's Favorite Movies Of All Time
    • 54 शीर्षक
    • सार्वजनिक
    • संशोधित 24 जून 2025

समीक्षाएं339

SpelingErrorकी रेटिंग
Last Days

Last Days

5.7
7
  • 21 जून 2025
  • An accurate portrayal of depression.

    Perhaps the best way to depict depression is to strip the film of all the forced pathos and grand dramatic moments we're so used to seeing and to simply present the mental state for what it really is. Given what we see of Blake (muttering nonsensical ramblings to himself as he walks around, shuffling from area to area in a zombie-like manner, and displaying disconnect whenever someone attempts to speak with him), what's being depicted is the point of no return - stuck in an endless trance-like daze for an indeterminate amount of time before you finally choose to end it. This minimalist approach put plenty of people off, but the predominant focus on Blake's mannerisms is exactly what makes the film work so well. In fact, the film actually loses a lot of steam whenever it shifts focus to the secondary characters, like Blake's bandmates, a pair of LDS missionaries, or a private detective. Explaining the origins of Mormonism or the details of Chung Ling Soo's death throughout those scenes served as a distraction from the emotional core. Fortunately, these moments were few enough that Blake's storyline was able to (mostly) shine through. I imagine Van Sant's approach will still leave plenty of people cold, but I'd say the film is exactly what it wanted to be. I don't expect for this to be the best portrayal of depression I'll ever come across (again, there was potential for it to be even better), but this is the type of approach to perfect and improve upon.
    Invasión

    Invasión

    7.2
    4
  • 8 मार्च 2025
  • A highly ambitious failure.

    Highly ambitious and quite atmospheric, but otherwise, a failure. The decision to be 100% vague and ambiguous over pretty much everything which goes on ultimately did more harm than good for me as it prevented me from forming an emotional connection with anyone or anything and left me asking "Why should I care?" constantly. For instance, a character gets shot. We know nothing about that character or the politics/goals of the side they're fighting for, so why should I care about that? The entire first half involves the resistances efforts to steal a truck from the invaders, but we know nothing about what the invaders are planning on doing if they're successful with their goals or even if the resistance fighters are actually the good guys, so why should I care about that? Overall, I was just left emotionally cold and unimpressed by everything since I was given nobody and nothing to latch on to. The closest the film came to moving me were the brief discussions on how the resistance has to save the city, but even this was too vague to go all the way. And yes, I'm aware that giving an explanation to the motives of both sides likely wasn't what the filmmakers wanted to do, so I don't mean for this to be "They should've made the film I wanted them to make" criticism. The film is exactly what they wanted it to be and, considering it has plenty of fans, it seemed to pay off pretty well. I, personally, was unmoved by it though.
    Ishtar

    Ishtar

    4.7
    4
  • 22 फ़र॰ 2025
  • It starts out great, but it falls apart after the first act.

    Having been a huge fan of Elaine May so far, I can see why this is usually considered to be her weakest film. Still though, I would classify it as an interesting failure, so I don't think its Razzie win was deserved. The opening 20 minutes are easily the best part about it. The two leads are dreadfully untalented, yet the fault lines between their perception of their talents vs. The reality of their situation makes their banter full of comedic tension. Also, while the duo's songwriting/singing voices aren't good by any means, you can still get a sense they have passion for what they do and are trying to make their dreadful act as exciting as possible. With the early stretches, this seemed destined for greatness. Unfortunately, once the pair arrive at Morocco, the brilliant character dynamics are pushed aside in service of a convoluted, twisty plot involving CIA overreach, political uprisings, left-wing guerillas, etc. This section does have a couple fun moments here and there and isn't poorly directed by any means, but it doesn't play to May's strengths which were on display in the opening and the potentially great film we got in the first act is lost. Now, was the fun of the detour worth it? I honestly don't think so. While I did enjoy the auction and helicopter scenes well enough, most of the comedy/plot threads still feel as if May is simply thinking them up as she goes along with little thought put into congruency/comedic bite. As a result, the jokes don't hold up when you start to analyze them and the satire on the CIA lacks any sort of bite. If it wasn't for the opening 20 minutes and if this was from a different director, I might've been more amused by this, but May was just the wrong director for this kind of film. Especially since it teases us by starting out in her signature style.
    सभी समीक्षाएं देखें

    हाल ही में लिए गए पोल

    534 कुल पोल लिए गए
    Best Palme d'Or (2010s)
    21 सित॰ 2019 लिया गया
    Loong Boonmee raleuk chat (2010)
    Face-Off: Supercomputers of Evil
    1 जुल॰ 2019 लिया गया
    Irving Metzman in WarGames (1983)
    Z Best Movies and TV to Zee
    1 जुल॰ 2019 लिया गया
    Brad Pitt in World War Z (2013)
    IMDb 250 Face-Off: Scorsese vs. Kubrick
    23 नव॰ 2018 लिया गया
    Martin Scorsese at an event for Golden Globe Awards (2010)
    Best Andrei Tarkovsky Film
    20 नव॰ 2018 लिया गया
    Ivanovo detstvo (1962)

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.