jlbmussy

This is a must see documentary. It is well put together for a 30 min run time. The film is a full rebuttal to another film which calls itself Leaving Neverland. Leaving neverland claims to be a non fiction documentary. but it is anything but. "Lies of" reveals how scandalous leaving neverland is.. how it manipulated viewers. How there are inconsistencies,. More shockingly it shows how the men changed their stories.. In a nutshell you must watch this to understand why you CAN NOT believe anything in Leaving Neverland.

An important must see documentary. Fully detailed step by step to learn the truth. People have been so misinformed by the 93 allegation yet it is primarily because of this allegation that people believe the others..The quote in this doc is true "ONCE YOU REALISE THIS ALLEGATION IS FALSE THE REST CRUMBLE" Why because when you truly examine this allegation in fine detail all the others are a copycat of his story. For the first time ever Danny Wu sets the record straight. The 93 allegation is also known as "The boy he payed off" yet another reason which concreted people's belief of guilt. Danny Wu details and educates on the real reason MJ had to settle. Once we understand the pay off we fully gets to grips on how much MJ was wronged, not just in 93 but for years after, even today. We have been fed a bunch of lies by the mass media who openly admit they can make blown up story from a grain of nothing.. I conclude from watching this documentary there is only one victim and his name is Michael Jackson. .

Opinions from people who knew MJ matter, People who have fully researched MJ and the case matter. This is something that was completely lacking in the leaving Neverland film . I find it bizarre that some have marked this film low and called it Bias yet you can bet those same people watched the one sided Leaving neverland and did not question how bias and one sided it was. This 1hr film needed to be bias as It was a response to LN, it provides proof to all the misgivings and lies that was shown in the Leaving Neverland film. Why are 1 star markers so surprised It's bias? Hypocritical to use it as a negative given the LN film. I liked that this film used documentation to prove facts. I also liked the input from people who knew him well, who knew the circumstances surrounding MJ at the time and can give insight into why the allegations against him are impossible.

I conclude Michael Jackson is and always was completely Innocent.