zimm44
जन॰ 2003 को शामिल हुए
नई प्रोफ़ाइल में आपका स्वागत है
हमारे अपडेट अभी भी डेवलप हो रहे हैं. हालांकि प्रोफ़ाइलका पिछला संस्करण अब उपलब्ध नहीं है, हम सक्रिय रूप से सुधारों पर काम कर रहे हैं, और कुछ अनुपलब्ध सुविधाएं जल्द ही वापस आ जाएंगी! उनकी वापसी के लिए हमारे साथ बने रहें। इस बीच, रेटिंग विश्लेषण अभी भी हमारे iOS और Android ऐप्स पर उपलब्ध है, जो प्रोफ़ाइल पेज पर पाया जाता है. वर्ष और शैली के अनुसार अपने रेटिंग वितरण (ओं) को देखने के लिए, कृपया हमारा नया हेल्प गाइड देखें.
बैज2
बैज कमाने का तरीका जानने के लिए, यहां बैज सहायता पेज जाएं.
समीक्षाएं7
zimm44की रेटिंग
Either we live in the world where a skillful marketing can make everyone's mind about the movie and sell it or... I don't know!
With quite interesting idea in its sleeve (a kid with no power becomes a 'superhero') the movie turns out to be a complete disaster. It's repetitive, boring, not that funny at all, has no likable characters (just psychos, dumb teens and even more dumb and psychotic 'villains') and is completely inconsistent in its form.
The idea is to put lots of typical clichés from different genres (teen comedies like American Pie, buddy movies, bloody revenge movies) and rip-offs from other comic-books (Batman, Spiderman, Punisher and even Iron Man) and put everything into a bag of movie sh.. as the main focus is to pack the sliced and incoherent story with never-ending bloody fight and torture scenes involving a kid stabbing, slicing and crushing people.
Hit Girl is stealing the show, right!?
It's like telling a 3-year-old to say 'F..k' and laughing because it sounds sooo funny. Then maybe he or she can kill a cat with a knife because you don't often see many 3-year-olds doing such a thing. The wise producers could do another popcorn flick set in primary school about kids killing Nazis and necrophiliacs. Sure they've never ever done that before! But should they! Is it really that funny for general audience nowadays?
Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against violence in movies if it has SOME point to the story or even if it's nicely stylized (Sin City, 300). But in times of Saws the sickening violence has no other point apart from 'pleasing the audience' and Kick-Ass might be at the top of this statement. It can really make someone feel that comic books are worthless, pointless and derivative piece of crap that base their originality on pushing the boundaries in showing the violence rather than coming up with some decent storytelling. Kick Ass is as funny as interesting. Simply awful.
With quite interesting idea in its sleeve (a kid with no power becomes a 'superhero') the movie turns out to be a complete disaster. It's repetitive, boring, not that funny at all, has no likable characters (just psychos, dumb teens and even more dumb and psychotic 'villains') and is completely inconsistent in its form.
The idea is to put lots of typical clichés from different genres (teen comedies like American Pie, buddy movies, bloody revenge movies) and rip-offs from other comic-books (Batman, Spiderman, Punisher and even Iron Man) and put everything into a bag of movie sh.. as the main focus is to pack the sliced and incoherent story with never-ending bloody fight and torture scenes involving a kid stabbing, slicing and crushing people.
Hit Girl is stealing the show, right!?
It's like telling a 3-year-old to say 'F..k' and laughing because it sounds sooo funny. Then maybe he or she can kill a cat with a knife because you don't often see many 3-year-olds doing such a thing. The wise producers could do another popcorn flick set in primary school about kids killing Nazis and necrophiliacs. Sure they've never ever done that before! But should they! Is it really that funny for general audience nowadays?
Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against violence in movies if it has SOME point to the story or even if it's nicely stylized (Sin City, 300). But in times of Saws the sickening violence has no other point apart from 'pleasing the audience' and Kick-Ass might be at the top of this statement. It can really make someone feel that comic books are worthless, pointless and derivative piece of crap that base their originality on pushing the boundaries in showing the violence rather than coming up with some decent storytelling. Kick Ass is as funny as interesting. Simply awful.
I don't understand Franzoni - the guy has written Gladiator and now comes up with something that lacks everything that made the first one so catchy.
The problem is not only with the approach that leaves magic behind as 'there was to be naturalistic'. It has no magic but it's also not naturalistic. The battles in fact are extremely boring because they are so unrealistic. Blood only appears on the swords' blades and it looks like the actors were only preparing to the actual shot not like the 4th century great battle. Bruckheimer wanted to have everything ( not a fairy tale only dark story but also large teen audience ) and the result is it failed in box office. But the real problem is that even if the movie was R it wouldn't change much except for the fact I wouldn't yawn during the battle scenes. The movie lacks the plot (it's funny that it has much in common with Tears of The Sun - they also take the innocent group of people to safe) It can be described simply - good characters want to be free but have to complete one last mission, the bad ones are just behind them, they finally meet and while some die in the frozen lake the majority dies in the final battle at the end. The heroes, apart from some heavy, idealistic, 'heroic' lines they occasionally deliver, lack clear motivation, there is NO character development this kind of movies desperately need, the characters simply are there to fight. The story concerning Arthur, Guinevere and Lancelot leads to nowhere, there is no decent antagonist to the main character,the film is full of naive, bombastic speeches (with the most horrible one saved for the end)
Everything seems out of place here and it's clear that nobody had a real idea what to do with the movie.The characters are to fight in battles in historical epic context - that's the whole idea.Even the music by Hans Zimmer as heard in the movie seems out of place, too heroic, uninspired and repetitive. - 2/10.
The problem is not only with the approach that leaves magic behind as 'there was to be naturalistic'. It has no magic but it's also not naturalistic. The battles in fact are extremely boring because they are so unrealistic. Blood only appears on the swords' blades and it looks like the actors were only preparing to the actual shot not like the 4th century great battle. Bruckheimer wanted to have everything ( not a fairy tale only dark story but also large teen audience ) and the result is it failed in box office. But the real problem is that even if the movie was R it wouldn't change much except for the fact I wouldn't yawn during the battle scenes. The movie lacks the plot (it's funny that it has much in common with Tears of The Sun - they also take the innocent group of people to safe) It can be described simply - good characters want to be free but have to complete one last mission, the bad ones are just behind them, they finally meet and while some die in the frozen lake the majority dies in the final battle at the end. The heroes, apart from some heavy, idealistic, 'heroic' lines they occasionally deliver, lack clear motivation, there is NO character development this kind of movies desperately need, the characters simply are there to fight. The story concerning Arthur, Guinevere and Lancelot leads to nowhere, there is no decent antagonist to the main character,the film is full of naive, bombastic speeches (with the most horrible one saved for the end)
Everything seems out of place here and it's clear that nobody had a real idea what to do with the movie.The characters are to fight in battles in historical epic context - that's the whole idea.Even the music by Hans Zimmer as heard in the movie seems out of place, too heroic, uninspired and repetitive. - 2/10.
I had to comment on that movie not because of the terrific oscar-worthy performances of the trio: Penn, Robbins, Bacon as this is the fact that everyone seems to notice. What is strange, many of you here don't like the ending which seems to be untrue and strange. I was even misled by the movie magazine that presented some irrational explanation of the final scene (Penn's talk with his wife and the parade)that turned out to be completely pointless after I saw the film.
It's, of course, my personal opinion but everything necessary to understand it is covered in the film's tagline: We bury our sins, we wash them clean. There is no catharsis in this movie. Nobody seems to change one's life or admit to one's sins. Everything is hidden and deliberately forgotten. The characters clearly need the feeling of stability in their life. After the storm the sun must rise. Linney's character lives with supportive husband and two daughters. The daughters need their father, the wife needs her husband. The dark days are over now - there comes a time to rest and forget. She simply defends the family from collapsing at the same time disclosing the sad but true character of humans reaction. We don't have to agree with her but there is a truth in her attitude. Penn's character in the scene of the murder also wants to believe that he has the right person despite the fact that there is no hard evidence. He immediately wants to finish everything and knows only one solution. The waiting is killing him and he wants to believe that this night everything is to end. The film comes to the shocking point of humans' emotional character - when sth beautiful - pure, strong love to the beloved daugther is the main reason of sth horrible - it leads the murder.
And the scene of parade - "light-hearted" Americans are watching the parade - children are laughing, music is playing, sun is shining and the whole afternoon seems almost idyllic. All the secrets and dark events are buried and the characters can start to pretend in front of everyone than nothing happened although it's a mystery for us what's happening in their souls.
Very pessimistic and anti-hollywood film that uses the typical themes of abuse,loss in the family and vengeance and mix them into a new, intense movie quality with deep and captivating performances. I don't believe in Academy Awards anymore but still I do hope that they will notice everything that Eastwood put into his latest effort and the film will gather the well-deserved collection of oscars.
10/10
It's, of course, my personal opinion but everything necessary to understand it is covered in the film's tagline: We bury our sins, we wash them clean. There is no catharsis in this movie. Nobody seems to change one's life or admit to one's sins. Everything is hidden and deliberately forgotten. The characters clearly need the feeling of stability in their life. After the storm the sun must rise. Linney's character lives with supportive husband and two daughters. The daughters need their father, the wife needs her husband. The dark days are over now - there comes a time to rest and forget. She simply defends the family from collapsing at the same time disclosing the sad but true character of humans reaction. We don't have to agree with her but there is a truth in her attitude. Penn's character in the scene of the murder also wants to believe that he has the right person despite the fact that there is no hard evidence. He immediately wants to finish everything and knows only one solution. The waiting is killing him and he wants to believe that this night everything is to end. The film comes to the shocking point of humans' emotional character - when sth beautiful - pure, strong love to the beloved daugther is the main reason of sth horrible - it leads the murder.
And the scene of parade - "light-hearted" Americans are watching the parade - children are laughing, music is playing, sun is shining and the whole afternoon seems almost idyllic. All the secrets and dark events are buried and the characters can start to pretend in front of everyone than nothing happened although it's a mystery for us what's happening in their souls.
Very pessimistic and anti-hollywood film that uses the typical themes of abuse,loss in the family and vengeance and mix them into a new, intense movie quality with deep and captivating performances. I don't believe in Academy Awards anymore but still I do hope that they will notice everything that Eastwood put into his latest effort and the film will gather the well-deserved collection of oscars.
10/10