dwbell

Tom is really the only judge who speaks with passion and knowledge to the actual dish. The other two just egg each other on like people at a drunken dinner party trying to out do each other's criticisms. I mean, what exactly are their skill-sets? One is a business woman and the other has a podcast. I'm sure this weeks guest, Anita, is a lovely person, but she came across as whining and miserable (not 'picky' as she described herself). She disliked virtually everything that was put in front of her. Ghastly. And why suddenly introduce a pescitarian judge. What's the point of the chefs cooking during the week if they have to make a suddenly untried dish during the finals? Pointless.