[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें

areehal

फ़र॰ 2001 को शामिल हुए
नई प्रोफ़ाइल में आपका स्वागत है
हमारे अपडेट अभी भी डेवलप हो रहे हैं. हालांकि प्रोफ़ाइलका पिछला संस्करण अब उपलब्ध नहीं है, हम सक्रिय रूप से सुधारों पर काम कर रहे हैं, और कुछ अनुपलब्ध सुविधाएं जल्द ही वापस आ जाएंगी! उनकी वापसी के लिए हमारे साथ बने रहें। इस बीच, रेटिंग विश्लेषण अभी भी हमारे iOS और Android ऐप्स पर उपलब्ध है, जो प्रोफ़ाइल पेज पर पाया जाता है. वर्ष और शैली के अनुसार अपने रेटिंग वितरण (ओं) को देखने के लिए, कृपया हमारा नया हेल्प गाइड देखें.

बैज2

बैज कमाने का तरीका जानने के लिए, यहां बैज सहायता पेज जाएं.
बैज एक्सप्लोर करें

रेटिंग20

areehalकी रेटिंग
Across the River and Into the Trees
6.69
Across the River and Into the Trees
2001: A Space Odyssey
8.310
2001: A Space Odyssey
Shadowlands
7.38
Shadowlands
Honsla Rakh
7.33
Honsla Rakh
2050
3.86
2050
The Green Hornet
5.81
The Green Hornet
स्टार ट्रेक बियांन्ड
7.02
स्टार ट्रेक बियांन्ड
Shabaash Mithu
5.68
Shabaash Mithu
The Nest
6.35
The Nest
सेंस और सेंसिबिलिटी
7.710
सेंस और सेंसिबिलिटी
AI Love You
4.56
AI Love You
The Russia House
6.19
The Russia House
Agatha Raisin
7.21
Agatha Raisin
Wo de qian ban sheng
6.710
Wo de qian ban sheng
Annihilation
6.83
Annihilation
1984
7.06
1984
It's a Wonderful Afterlife
5.44
It's a Wonderful Afterlife
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
5.79
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
Morte a Venezia
7.310
Morte a Venezia
शोले
8.11
शोले

समीक्षाएं7

areehalकी रेटिंग
The Green Hornet

The Green Hornet

5.8
1
  • 17 जून 2024
  • Truly imbecilic

    So who was the biggest imbecile connected with the making of this mediocre film?

    Let's start with the chief culprit, Seth Rogen - possibly the worst actor out there and apparently also the worst writer since he also collaborated on the script. Then there are the producers who conned the studios into shelling out money for this rubbish. Of course, the direction by Michael Gondry, whoever he is, is equally to blame.

    This is one of those films where you think it can't possibly get worse but shocks you by sinking to lower and lower depths with every scene.

    Fortunately, I never saw this at the theatre. I bought the 3D Bluray on clearance simply to see if the 3D was any good. The opening credits and Bluray menus actually look really cool in 3D. The cars and special effects also look fabulous in 3D. Seth Rogen isn't helped by depth, however, he is grotesque and unattractive enough in two dimensions, never mind three. Who in their right mind would cast him as a leading man?

    So my plan is to create an edited 3D digital file that has about 20 minutes of the cool 3D stuff and then cremate the BluRay.
    स्टार ट्रेक बियांन्ड

    स्टार ट्रेक बियांन्ड

    7.0
    2
  • 10 जून 2024
  • Great technical achievement undermined by formulaic screenplay and mediocre direction

    I watched this film for the 3D, the CGI, and set design. It delivers on all three fronts.

    Unfortunately, it also comes with actors, a screenwriter, and a director. All three are failures.

    Chris Pine and Zoe Saldana give decent performances but the rest of the main actors are abysmal. Director Justin Lin must surely take the blame. Either he is inexperienced or totally inept. Then there is the "paint by numbers" screenplay that strings together every cliche of the action genre. I assume screenwriter Simon Pegg was enjoying a few drinks while he had ChatGPT churn out this rubbish. Certainly, no human intellect is in evidence. As we know, studio executives can't tell the difference so the ultimate shame falls on the producers. That leaves the viewers. Well we also know there are lots of mediocre people out there, so there will always be an appreciative audience for mindless onscreen mayhem and destruction. Fortunately, many smart people have seen the film and detested it and I enjoyed reading their reviews.
    Wo de qian ban sheng

    Wo de qian ban sheng

    6.7
    10
  • 15 फ़र॰ 2021
  • Engaging, intelligent, emotionally satisfying drama

    Ultimately this is a melodramatic soap but it is so well done and the production values are so high that it compares well to BBC-Netflix-Amazon series rather than the rubbish we see on American networks. In some ways, it's the Chinese Madmen.

    I was initially intrigued because I wanted to see a portrayal of Chinese life by Chinese producers for a Chinese audience, rather than a western interpretation. It is based in Shanghai and we get to see many beautiful shots of the city. The offices are beautiful, the streets are spotless, there is no air pollution, parking is a cinch and there are no poor people to jar the aesthetics. So, ok, it's a fantasy world but it's a Chinese fantasy so in a way it's authentic. Ironically, then, the fantasy is to be American. Whatever the politically situation in China, it is clear, from this highly acclaimed (in China) TV series that culturally the USA (or more specifically Hollywood) has won! Western clothes, cars, music, fast food, toys, cosmetics, shoes, etc... are what the viewers aspire to.

    So apart from the anthropological aspect, how is it as entertainment? Totally engaging! - the inaccurate and sometimes comical subtitles not withstanding. The acting, direction, cinematography, set design, dialog, and plot are all world class.

    The title refers to the main protagonist's life before and after a tumultuous divorce. Her good looks eased her into a life of upper middle class bliss where shopping, eating at fine restaurants, turning up her nose at the common folk, showing off to her family were her primary occupations. There are half a dozen other main characters. As the story progressives each of these characters' multiple facets are sympathetically and honestly revealed. There are a couple of ancillary characters that are perhaps one dimensional but it seems that is deliberately done for comic effect. The main characters all have complexity and nuances and flaws just like all of us. It's easy to empathize with their lives and the situations they find themselves in.

    The complexity and heartbreak of divorce between loving parents with children involved is so well portrayed it will bring tears to anyone who has empathy.
    सभी समीक्षाएं देखें

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.