OniFR
सित॰ 2024 को शामिल हुए
नई प्रोफ़ाइल में आपका स्वागत है
हमारे अपडेट अभी भी डेवलप हो रहे हैं. हालांकि प्रोफ़ाइलका पिछला संस्करण अब उपलब्ध नहीं है, हम सक्रिय रूप से सुधारों पर काम कर रहे हैं, और कुछ अनुपलब्ध सुविधाएं जल्द ही वापस आ जाएंगी! उनकी वापसी के लिए हमारे साथ बने रहें। इस बीच, रेटिंग विश्लेषण अभी भी हमारे iOS और Android ऐप्स पर उपलब्ध है, जो प्रोफ़ाइल पेज पर पाया जाता है. वर्ष और शैली के अनुसार अपने रेटिंग वितरण (ओं) को देखने के लिए, कृपया हमारा नया हेल्प गाइड देखें.
बैज2
बैज कमाने का तरीका जानने के लिए, यहां बैज सहायता पेज जाएं.
रेटिंग337
OniFRकी रेटिंग
समीक्षाएं319
OniFRकी रेटिंग
Let's be honest: most live-action remakes are like vegan kebabs - they promise you something juicy and sizzling, and you end up with flavorless tofu soaked in lukewarm wokism. But this time? A miracle. Dean DeBlois is back at the helm, remaking his own film... without butchering it. Sure, he's self-copying, but he does it with class. This isn't a Disney bloodbath - it's a technical upgrade, RTX ON, ray tracing in your face, and dragons in full 4K HDR Dolby Apocalypse.
Yes, some scenes are shot-for-shot - but not to push an agenda or force in a token mermaid. It's to give you chills. And damn, it works.
Hiccup is still the scrawny misfit, sounding like a guy who grew up in Asterixland reading The Silmarillion in secret. But in live-action? It hits harder. You feel the weight of the world, the weight of his father (Gerard Butler, who spits testosterone like a volcano spits lava), and above all, the weight of destiny.
Toothless? Cuter than a kitten, deadlier than a Russian airstrike on Donetsk. He's got the face of a plush toy and the firepower of an F-22 Raptor. The fusion of Pikachu and death from above.
The duo still works. It's that rare, virile friendship no one dares write anymore. No inclusive debates, no angsty postmodern soul-searching - just a kid, a dragon, and a mission to bring peace to a people who live half-naked on a monster-infested island.
Visually, it's a knockout blow to the limp digital aesthetics we're drowning in. The dragons soar, roar, burn, and blow your mind. Think Game of Thrones season 4, not Little Mermaid 2023's Playmobil CGI.
The direction grabs your guts, throws you skyward on dragon-back, and hurls you into fire like an extra in Gladiator. Every frame is precise, sculpted, nearly sacred.
You want to kneel before the screen. You feel the heat, see the scales, taste the fire. This isn't a movie - it's a goddamn journey.
The real stroke of genius? Dragons (2025) is, deep down, a noble, reactionary film: a boy who grows out of war without rejecting strength. A leader in the making who learns not to obey blindly, but without spitting on his lineage.
Stoick is no fragile dad. He's a mountain of muscle and wisdom who teaches you that leadership isn't about Zoom meetings on compassion. It's about cutting, protecting, and dying if you must, for the ones you love.
And Astrid? No cardboard girl-power symbol here. She fights, she doubts nothing, she backs Hiccup without neutering him. A woman as we love them: strong, straight, useful - not tweeting while the world burns.
Yes, it's a reimagining. A retelling. Nothing brand new. But everything is done right. It's respectful, heartfelt, crafted. Not a cynical product engineered by a Xanaxed-out AI. Not a Netflix boardroom Frankenstein stitched together with ethno-climato-sentimental quotas.
This is real cinema: simple, powerful, moving, spectacular. With real stakes, real choices, real goosebumps. Not ideological soup with a sticky message clinging to your sneakers.
This film doesn't try to please everyone. It just wants to tell a story. A real one. About bravery, loyalty, and honor - words that make sociologists twitch, but that ignite the hearts of real men.
Dragons (2025) isn't just a visual facelift. It's a living tribute. A love cry for a timeless tale, told with fire, muscle, and emotion.
It's proof that when you let a good director do his job - without ideological handcuffs - you can deliver spectacle without selling your soul to the algorithm gods.
So go to the theater. See that dragon. Breathe in the smoke and sky.
Because this, my friend, isn't "content".
It's cinema. Real, roaring, fire-breathing cinema.
Yes, some scenes are shot-for-shot - but not to push an agenda or force in a token mermaid. It's to give you chills. And damn, it works.
Hiccup is still the scrawny misfit, sounding like a guy who grew up in Asterixland reading The Silmarillion in secret. But in live-action? It hits harder. You feel the weight of the world, the weight of his father (Gerard Butler, who spits testosterone like a volcano spits lava), and above all, the weight of destiny.
Toothless? Cuter than a kitten, deadlier than a Russian airstrike on Donetsk. He's got the face of a plush toy and the firepower of an F-22 Raptor. The fusion of Pikachu and death from above.
The duo still works. It's that rare, virile friendship no one dares write anymore. No inclusive debates, no angsty postmodern soul-searching - just a kid, a dragon, and a mission to bring peace to a people who live half-naked on a monster-infested island.
Visually, it's a knockout blow to the limp digital aesthetics we're drowning in. The dragons soar, roar, burn, and blow your mind. Think Game of Thrones season 4, not Little Mermaid 2023's Playmobil CGI.
The direction grabs your guts, throws you skyward on dragon-back, and hurls you into fire like an extra in Gladiator. Every frame is precise, sculpted, nearly sacred.
You want to kneel before the screen. You feel the heat, see the scales, taste the fire. This isn't a movie - it's a goddamn journey.
The real stroke of genius? Dragons (2025) is, deep down, a noble, reactionary film: a boy who grows out of war without rejecting strength. A leader in the making who learns not to obey blindly, but without spitting on his lineage.
Stoick is no fragile dad. He's a mountain of muscle and wisdom who teaches you that leadership isn't about Zoom meetings on compassion. It's about cutting, protecting, and dying if you must, for the ones you love.
And Astrid? No cardboard girl-power symbol here. She fights, she doubts nothing, she backs Hiccup without neutering him. A woman as we love them: strong, straight, useful - not tweeting while the world burns.
Yes, it's a reimagining. A retelling. Nothing brand new. But everything is done right. It's respectful, heartfelt, crafted. Not a cynical product engineered by a Xanaxed-out AI. Not a Netflix boardroom Frankenstein stitched together with ethno-climato-sentimental quotas.
This is real cinema: simple, powerful, moving, spectacular. With real stakes, real choices, real goosebumps. Not ideological soup with a sticky message clinging to your sneakers.
This film doesn't try to please everyone. It just wants to tell a story. A real one. About bravery, loyalty, and honor - words that make sociologists twitch, but that ignite the hearts of real men.
Dragons (2025) isn't just a visual facelift. It's a living tribute. A love cry for a timeless tale, told with fire, muscle, and emotion.
It's proof that when you let a good director do his job - without ideological handcuffs - you can deliver spectacle without selling your soul to the algorithm gods.
So go to the theater. See that dragon. Breathe in the smoke and sky.
Because this, my friend, isn't "content".
It's cinema. Real, roaring, fire-breathing cinema.
Len Wiseman, bless his soul, is like a small-town DJ who accidentally landed behind the decks at Hellfest: he cranks up the decibels, fires up the strobe lights, and prays it works. Ballerina is what he came up with - a jacked-up spin-off in the John Wick universe where ballet is just a trauma cover-up dressed in pirouettes and Glocks.
The guy took Black Swan, injected it with testosterone, and strapped it with ammo belts. The result? A ballerina who smashes Russian mobsters like she's rehearsing The Nutcracker with Rambo and John Matrix in the orchestra pit.
Yes, things explode, people bleed, and fists fly... but sometimes it feels like the script was written under nitrous oxide. Looking for sense? Keep walking. This is style over substance - on purpose.
Ana de Armas isn't an actress here - she's a weapon of mass destruction with a L'Oréal-level blowout. Her character, Eve, is a ballet assassin straight out of a vodka-soaked fever dream.
And she delivers. She throws arabesques while shooting one-handed, takes down Russian thugs in heels, and cries in silence with a gun in hand. She's like Lara Croft, Chun-Li, and Joan of Arc on meth.
But sometimes you can feel the script forgot to write her lines. She jumps from trauma to full-on murder mode like The Last of Us Part II rewritten by the French version of Jerry Springer. Still, she oozes charisma, hits hard, and makes the rest of the cast look like abandoned Zara mannequins.
Let's be real: the screenwriter probably hid his brain under a glass coffee table. There are ideas, some cool moments... and then it all goes sideways. One minute you're watching poetic vengeance, and the next - a line of dialogue makes Fast & Furious 9 look like Tarkovsky.
It's all super stylized, like Bayonetta in cinema form - but with zero logic or flow. John Wick, but assembled like IKEA furniture using a jackhammer. Moments of grace, followed by tonal crashes that feel like a 7th grader's essay on the Ukraine war.
You get it: she wants revenge. She's got flashbacks, scars, and chakras misaligned - but damn, can someone sequence those scenes with at least some respect for our neurons?
We get the tropes: the Ruska Roma, clean guns, shady hotels, absurd rules. But this isn't John Wick 3 - it's John Wick: Beta Demo Version.
Ian McShane pops in like he's cashing a check between two whiskies. Anjelica Huston plays the mob mama with the dead-eyed stare of a corporate HR director on Xanax. Keanu? He shows up, shoots a bit, leaves. He's more decorative than useful.
It's fun to revisit this world, but it's autopilot fan service. Like seeing an old friend who now just stares at their phone while eating chips.
Let's be honest though - the fight scenes? Damn stylish. Violent, crisp, efficient. You get armed ballet, razor-sharp choreography, and wide shots where you actually see the action. It's somewhere between Kill Bill and The Raid, with a touch of Devil May Cry posing.
But the film's obsession with looking cool crushes the intensity. Every scene wants to be a war painting. You stop watching an action flick and start watching a symphonic metal video staged at the Bolshoi.
Too much is too much. Any emotional depth gets buried under a landslide of slow-mo, blue filters, and pseudo-deep lines about wounded souls and inner suffering. Yeah, okay - but tone it down, maestro.
Ballerina isn't a disaster. It's a stylish mess. A post-Soviet opera on steroids where a dancer/assassin settles scores with everything that breathes. Ana de Armas shines, the rest flickers, and the plot stumbles over its own pointe shoes.
Visually brutal, musically hypnotic, but narratively dumb as hell. You'll have fun - if you check your brain at the door next to your jacket and moral compass.
Did we need this? No.
Is it cathartic? Hell yes.
Do you come out a better person? Definitely not.
But sometimes, it's nice to watch a girl with an angel face break a Russian mobster's jaw to music.
So thanks for the carnage, Ana.
But next time?
Give us a movie. Not a year-end recital with Kalashnikovs.
The guy took Black Swan, injected it with testosterone, and strapped it with ammo belts. The result? A ballerina who smashes Russian mobsters like she's rehearsing The Nutcracker with Rambo and John Matrix in the orchestra pit.
Yes, things explode, people bleed, and fists fly... but sometimes it feels like the script was written under nitrous oxide. Looking for sense? Keep walking. This is style over substance - on purpose.
Ana de Armas isn't an actress here - she's a weapon of mass destruction with a L'Oréal-level blowout. Her character, Eve, is a ballet assassin straight out of a vodka-soaked fever dream.
And she delivers. She throws arabesques while shooting one-handed, takes down Russian thugs in heels, and cries in silence with a gun in hand. She's like Lara Croft, Chun-Li, and Joan of Arc on meth.
But sometimes you can feel the script forgot to write her lines. She jumps from trauma to full-on murder mode like The Last of Us Part II rewritten by the French version of Jerry Springer. Still, she oozes charisma, hits hard, and makes the rest of the cast look like abandoned Zara mannequins.
Let's be real: the screenwriter probably hid his brain under a glass coffee table. There are ideas, some cool moments... and then it all goes sideways. One minute you're watching poetic vengeance, and the next - a line of dialogue makes Fast & Furious 9 look like Tarkovsky.
It's all super stylized, like Bayonetta in cinema form - but with zero logic or flow. John Wick, but assembled like IKEA furniture using a jackhammer. Moments of grace, followed by tonal crashes that feel like a 7th grader's essay on the Ukraine war.
You get it: she wants revenge. She's got flashbacks, scars, and chakras misaligned - but damn, can someone sequence those scenes with at least some respect for our neurons?
We get the tropes: the Ruska Roma, clean guns, shady hotels, absurd rules. But this isn't John Wick 3 - it's John Wick: Beta Demo Version.
Ian McShane pops in like he's cashing a check between two whiskies. Anjelica Huston plays the mob mama with the dead-eyed stare of a corporate HR director on Xanax. Keanu? He shows up, shoots a bit, leaves. He's more decorative than useful.
It's fun to revisit this world, but it's autopilot fan service. Like seeing an old friend who now just stares at their phone while eating chips.
Let's be honest though - the fight scenes? Damn stylish. Violent, crisp, efficient. You get armed ballet, razor-sharp choreography, and wide shots where you actually see the action. It's somewhere between Kill Bill and The Raid, with a touch of Devil May Cry posing.
But the film's obsession with looking cool crushes the intensity. Every scene wants to be a war painting. You stop watching an action flick and start watching a symphonic metal video staged at the Bolshoi.
Too much is too much. Any emotional depth gets buried under a landslide of slow-mo, blue filters, and pseudo-deep lines about wounded souls and inner suffering. Yeah, okay - but tone it down, maestro.
Ballerina isn't a disaster. It's a stylish mess. A post-Soviet opera on steroids where a dancer/assassin settles scores with everything that breathes. Ana de Armas shines, the rest flickers, and the plot stumbles over its own pointe shoes.
Visually brutal, musically hypnotic, but narratively dumb as hell. You'll have fun - if you check your brain at the door next to your jacket and moral compass.
Did we need this? No.
Is it cathartic? Hell yes.
Do you come out a better person? Definitely not.
But sometimes, it's nice to watch a girl with an angel face break a Russian mobster's jaw to music.
So thanks for the carnage, Ana.
But next time?
Give us a movie. Not a year-end recital with Kalashnikovs.
J. J. Abrams shoots like he's mainlining Lost through an IV drip. Lens flares everywhere, plot twists every ten minutes, and a sense of rhythm that makes a Naruto Shippuden episode look like a monk's meditation retreat. And here he comes, storming into Mission: Impossible like a crusader at a vegan orgy - bringing order, raising the bar, and blowing everything up with nuclear precision.
It's tight, it's tense, it's written with an actual brain and not a bag of Skittles. And goddamn, that feels good.
Ethan Hunt in this movie isn't a secret agent - he's a pissed-off bull with a trainer's badge. The guy supposedly retired, but one call and boom - he's back, like Aragorn at Helm's Deep: angry, majestic, and with flawless hair.
Tom Cruise is the only man on Earth who can blow up a bridge, wreck a squad of bad guys, and save his girl with a defibrillator - all without wrinkling his shirt. Even Solid Snake would be ashamed of that much style.
And the man sells it. He doesn't act - he believes. He's not an actor, he's a zealot on a divine mission. If he tells you he's gonna save the world, you drop your beer and help him load the ammo.
And the villain? He's not just evil - he's cosmically vile. He talks soft, doesn't sweat, but one look at his face and you feel the urge to run. He's not here for theatrics - he's here to burn it all.
When he threatens your family, it doesn't feel like a movie - it feels real. You'd rather fight a naked Balrog than sit through five minutes with this guy.
He's got the dead stare of a corporate HR director and the soul of someone who'd slice you up with a melon baller while reciting The Chronicles of Riddick. That's why he's perfect.
No more threesomes between a gun, a virus, and a bombshell. Now Ethan just wants to protect his girl and assemble an IKEA kitchen without it being blown to hell. It's simple. It's honest. Almost touching.
The guy wants peace - and the universe replies with missiles. What we get is Romeo and Juliet, Call of Duty edition. And you buy it. Because it's not cheesy - it's raw.
When Julia gets kidnapped, you grit your teeth. When he shocks her heart in a makeshift hospital like it's a YouTube tutorial, you call it a miracle. And for once, we get a love story that isn't bathed in cheap soap and third-wave feminist slogans.
Finally - a script that stands on its own feet! It's not Shakespeare, but it moves, it hits, it thinks. You've got a real mission, real stakes, and no goddamn coffee breaks.
The Berlin opening? Brutal. The bridge ambush? A masterpiece. The church escape? It's like a bonus level from Splinter Cell, approved by Jesus Christ himself.
Everything's locked and loaded, like a Glock blessed by John Rambo. Perfect balance of fights, stealth, and emotional tension. And damn, it feels good not being treated like a moron by some woke writer who thinks action movies are sexist.
Mission: Impossible III is where the saga stops fumbling and starts firing live rounds into the face of limp cinema. This isn't just an action film - it's a crusade. Tom Cruise comes back with the fury of a tax office clerk and the heart of a paladin to remind us that masculinity isn't an option - it's the goddamn solution.
Abrams directs like a terrorist of beauty, the actors go full throttle, and the story stands tall like an old Foreign Legion colonel. You leave the theater ready to lift the world with nothing but forearm strength.
Bottom line? It's a movie that pays tribute to true masculinity - the kind that breaks walls, saves the girl, and still makes it home in time for dinner.
It's tight, it's tense, it's written with an actual brain and not a bag of Skittles. And goddamn, that feels good.
Ethan Hunt in this movie isn't a secret agent - he's a pissed-off bull with a trainer's badge. The guy supposedly retired, but one call and boom - he's back, like Aragorn at Helm's Deep: angry, majestic, and with flawless hair.
Tom Cruise is the only man on Earth who can blow up a bridge, wreck a squad of bad guys, and save his girl with a defibrillator - all without wrinkling his shirt. Even Solid Snake would be ashamed of that much style.
And the man sells it. He doesn't act - he believes. He's not an actor, he's a zealot on a divine mission. If he tells you he's gonna save the world, you drop your beer and help him load the ammo.
And the villain? He's not just evil - he's cosmically vile. He talks soft, doesn't sweat, but one look at his face and you feel the urge to run. He's not here for theatrics - he's here to burn it all.
When he threatens your family, it doesn't feel like a movie - it feels real. You'd rather fight a naked Balrog than sit through five minutes with this guy.
He's got the dead stare of a corporate HR director and the soul of someone who'd slice you up with a melon baller while reciting The Chronicles of Riddick. That's why he's perfect.
No more threesomes between a gun, a virus, and a bombshell. Now Ethan just wants to protect his girl and assemble an IKEA kitchen without it being blown to hell. It's simple. It's honest. Almost touching.
The guy wants peace - and the universe replies with missiles. What we get is Romeo and Juliet, Call of Duty edition. And you buy it. Because it's not cheesy - it's raw.
When Julia gets kidnapped, you grit your teeth. When he shocks her heart in a makeshift hospital like it's a YouTube tutorial, you call it a miracle. And for once, we get a love story that isn't bathed in cheap soap and third-wave feminist slogans.
Finally - a script that stands on its own feet! It's not Shakespeare, but it moves, it hits, it thinks. You've got a real mission, real stakes, and no goddamn coffee breaks.
The Berlin opening? Brutal. The bridge ambush? A masterpiece. The church escape? It's like a bonus level from Splinter Cell, approved by Jesus Christ himself.
Everything's locked and loaded, like a Glock blessed by John Rambo. Perfect balance of fights, stealth, and emotional tension. And damn, it feels good not being treated like a moron by some woke writer who thinks action movies are sexist.
Mission: Impossible III is where the saga stops fumbling and starts firing live rounds into the face of limp cinema. This isn't just an action film - it's a crusade. Tom Cruise comes back with the fury of a tax office clerk and the heart of a paladin to remind us that masculinity isn't an option - it's the goddamn solution.
Abrams directs like a terrorist of beauty, the actors go full throttle, and the story stands tall like an old Foreign Legion colonel. You leave the theater ready to lift the world with nothing but forearm strength.
Bottom line? It's a movie that pays tribute to true masculinity - the kind that breaks walls, saves the girl, and still makes it home in time for dinner.