macmar
अक्टू॰ 2000 को शामिल हुए
नई प्रोफ़ाइल में आपका स्वागत है
हमारे अपडेट अभी भी डेवलप हो रहे हैं. हालांकि प्रोफ़ाइलका पिछला संस्करण अब उपलब्ध नहीं है, हम सक्रिय रूप से सुधारों पर काम कर रहे हैं, और कुछ अनुपलब्ध सुविधाएं जल्द ही वापस आ जाएंगी! उनकी वापसी के लिए हमारे साथ बने रहें। इस बीच, रेटिंग विश्लेषण अभी भी हमारे iOS और Android ऐप्स पर उपलब्ध है, जो प्रोफ़ाइल पेज पर पाया जाता है. वर्ष और शैली के अनुसार अपने रेटिंग वितरण (ओं) को देखने के लिए, कृपया हमारा नया हेल्प गाइड देखें.
बैज5
बैज कमाने का तरीका जानने के लिए, यहां बैज सहायता पेज जाएं.
रेटिंग174
macmarकी रेटिंग
समीक्षाएं9
macmarकी रेटिंग
I say age thing, as when I was watching it I kept thinking of past Dr's my fave being Tom Baker, but I think this is my age, as my sister and girlfriend who are both 10 years younger then I thought Christopher Eccleston was the man in the blue box.
Christopher Eccleston, smiled a bit too much for me, hay nothing wrong with a bit of fun, but when you look like a psycho it's time to stop, but take nothing away from him he did look the part and had a wonderful mad energy.
Billie Piper, why not, she might work out, and thank God she's not like Bonnie Langford.
All in all, am glad the Dr's back.
Like I said it's my age, time to let Tom Baker go and give Christopher Eccleston
Christopher Eccleston, smiled a bit too much for me, hay nothing wrong with a bit of fun, but when you look like a psycho it's time to stop, but take nothing away from him he did look the part and had a wonderful mad energy.
Billie Piper, why not, she might work out, and thank God she's not like Bonnie Langford.
All in all, am glad the Dr's back.
Like I said it's my age, time to let Tom Baker go and give Christopher Eccleston
I was looking forward to this one, I do like a bit of Sherlock Holmes at Christmas, and this was worth a look.
Not bad job by Rupert Everett, not my first choice for the part, but what do I know. A deferent kind of Sherlock Holmes, and this time he is shown with flaws, in fact Dr Watson has the brains. The acting is pretty good all round.
An odd use of London, as you don't see much of the place.
Think it would be good to see Rupert Everett have a go at some more Holmes.
Ian Hart is back as Dr Watson as good as he was in "The Hound of the Baskervilles"
Not bad job by Rupert Everett, not my first choice for the part, but what do I know. A deferent kind of Sherlock Holmes, and this time he is shown with flaws, in fact Dr Watson has the brains. The acting is pretty good all round.
An odd use of London, as you don't see much of the place.
Think it would be good to see Rupert Everett have a go at some more Holmes.
Ian Hart is back as Dr Watson as good as he was in "The Hound of the Baskervilles"
I was thinking about this show the other day, and I had to look it up, more to see if it was real or something I half made up from my childhood.
It was one of the shows we as kids where aloud to watch, and I remember looking forward to the show ever week, and I kind of remember the song, 'putting on the nonsense, the good old fashioned nonsense'.
I would love to see it now, just to see if it was a good as I remember, but then again, maybe not, as somethings are better half remembered, like ones childhood.
It was one of the shows we as kids where aloud to watch, and I remember looking forward to the show ever week, and I kind of remember the song, 'putting on the nonsense, the good old fashioned nonsense'.
I would love to see it now, just to see if it was a good as I remember, but then again, maybe not, as somethings are better half remembered, like ones childhood.