thoms1

This is one of the best things that Chevy was ever involved in. Although ninety five percent of his participation was only his voice, as he was killed off early in the movie, I thought that the movie was good, solid entertainment. Almost without exception, I've always seen the film badly panned by most critics and movie reviews, but I was really pleased to see that most folks who took the time to comment on IMDb were highly complimentary and reaffirmed that I was not wrong on this one. Maybe you just need to have a bit of imagination and a real love of animals, particularly dogs, to get all there is out of the movie. See it, enjoy it and then comment. Don't let poor reviewers keep you from the fun!

Bill Murray has the narrowest range of any actor who has been "starred" in a movie. After being totally "Lost in Translation," I decided to give Bill another try with this one, but have come away feeling like I just wasted the time it took to stay awake though this lifeless dirge.

I truly believe, that another actor with some range of emotion could have easily increased my enjoyment of the film and added something in the way of emotion and depth to a character who is strictly two dimensional on the screen.

Another issue I had with this film is that he literally just sits through 98% or the film and the camera mirrors his his lack of emotion throughout this enthronement. Caddy Shack - Great! Groundhog Day - Good! Broken Flowers - Only for the patient and alert Bill Murray Fan...

I have seen "Bowling for Columbine" and found it to be interesting and perhaps even entertaining, but its owner is one of the most repulsive figures in the business. That's the feeling I took into watching Fahrenheit 9/11. That this film earned a "Palm d'Or" at Cannes tells me that the Golden Palm is no longer a guide to great film making, but a political vote cast by a liberal camp. Michal Moore conducts interviews with bait & switch questions, conclusion drawn from totally irrelevant statements and journalism without context. While this film did give me cause think about the Iraq war and terrorism in general, it left me feeling that I was watching a video of some internet conspiracy theory that had gone on too long. As he did in Columbine, he duped people into looking foolish, paraded grief as some special insight and conducted a strident, personal vendetta directed toward GWB. Though I don't agree with all of the administrations decisions and policies conducted in the Middle East or even many of the "Homeland Security" vs. freedom implications, I could not give any credence to this biased, poorly assembled, piece of propaganda. Perhaps propaganda was the category under which the Palm d'Or was awarded and in that case, it may have been deserved. I awarded this effort 3 of 10 based on its ability to raise controversy, but wouldn't recommend that people actually view it, unless there was nothing else on.