IMDb रेटिंग
3.6/10
2 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अंटार्कटिक की गहरे बर्फ में, भूवैज्ञानिकों की एक टीम एक पुरानी नाजी प्रयोगशाला को उजागर करती है जो अभी भी बरकरार है जहां अंधेरे प्रयोग हुए थे. दुनिया को जीतने के लिए, नाजियों ने संशोधित शार्... सभी पढ़ेंअंटार्कटिक की गहरे बर्फ में, भूवैज्ञानिकों की एक टीम एक पुरानी नाजी प्रयोगशाला को उजागर करती है जो अभी भी बरकरार है जहां अंधेरे प्रयोग हुए थे. दुनिया को जीतने के लिए, नाजियों ने संशोधित शार्क बनाई जो उड़ने में सक्षम थीं.अंटार्कटिक की गहरे बर्फ में, भूवैज्ञानिकों की एक टीम एक पुरानी नाजी प्रयोगशाला को उजागर करती है जो अभी भी बरकरार है जहां अंधेरे प्रयोग हुए थे. दुनिया को जीतने के लिए, नाजियों ने संशोधित शार्क बनाई जो उड़ने में सक्षम थीं.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 2 जीत और कुल 1 नामांकन
Barbara Nedeljakova
- Angelique Richter
- (as Barbara Nedeljáková)
T. Love
- Pierre Colbert
- (as Travis Love)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Overall, above avg special effects and a pinch of nudity thrown in. Tom Savini, the master of gore effects, brings his magic to this movie. Can't be all bad.
Sky Shark provides some cheesy and gory fun, but sadly only for the first 30 minutes or so, after that, especially the mid section, strongly loses momentum (explanation over explanation etc.) and I was finally rather bored. With a better script, focused on the action like in the beginning, Sky Sharks could have been a fine cheesy horror experience. Anyway, if Nazi-horror movies like Iron Sky, Frankenstein's Army, Ghosts of War, Blood Vessel, Overlord, Dead Snow and the like, or games like the Castle Wolfenstein franchise, rings a bell, you may give Sky Sharks a try.
Okay, so it's worth 3.5 / 10 rating, probably, in that the actors all spoke clearly enough to be heard, the script was probably printed ahead of time on paper, no mike booms were visible, and generally the lighting was good enough to see what was happening, most of the time.
My complaint is, there's not NEARLY enough nudity in this picture. I think movies of this ilk could be vastly improved by having just about everyone onscreen do the same performance as before, except naked. They shouldn't acknowledge the nudity, either. They should just do the scene as-is, completely starkers.
This would greatly improve the viewability in that at least the people waiting for nudity will have it, and those interested in the eye candy of the actresses will be able to have their interests met.
My complaint is, there's not NEARLY enough nudity in this picture. I think movies of this ilk could be vastly improved by having just about everyone onscreen do the same performance as before, except naked. They shouldn't acknowledge the nudity, either. They should just do the scene as-is, completely starkers.
This would greatly improve the viewability in that at least the people waiting for nudity will have it, and those interested in the eye candy of the actresses will be able to have their interests met.
About 20 mins into the movie I've felt an urge to look up the name and see a photo of the director of this movie so I can blacklist him and avoid further mistakes.
At first this looked like an Asylum-type movie without the humor part but it got even worse. Dialogs, acting, editing, directing, writing... all terrible, except some decent CGI.
I think some people can't be objective about their own projects. I believe excessive self-confidence drives people into very ridiculous situations. It gets even worse if you don't have any honest friends around you to wake you up and pull you out of your 'psychosis'. Making such movies is a long and gradual process. I wish there were someone at some point to tell the truth and prevent a real disaster from happening.
I gave 1 star for the movie, then raised to 2 for the CGI team.
I think some people can't be objective about their own projects. I believe excessive self-confidence drives people into very ridiculous situations. It gets even worse if you don't have any honest friends around you to wake you up and pull you out of your 'psychosis'. Making such movies is a long and gradual process. I wish there were someone at some point to tell the truth and prevent a real disaster from happening.
I gave 1 star for the movie, then raised to 2 for the CGI team.
The movie is every bit as terrible as the title and poster suggests. The filmmakers gathered a lot of names, that are actually well known in Germany, but (with very few exceptions) haven't done anything good in the last decades.
The idea of doing a trashy movie like Sharknado and Iron Sky isnt terrible, but this isn't 2010 anymore. We've seen it over and over and these movies had several sequels while Sky Sharks was announced and did nothing for years.
The filmmakers showed off a critic on Facebook and got a lot of support by their own fanbase. What do you expect. The ones that supported the negative review got blocked. So you know who you deal with here.
The idea of doing a trashy movie like Sharknado and Iron Sky isnt terrible, but this isn't 2010 anymore. We've seen it over and over and these movies had several sequels while Sky Sharks was announced and did nothing for years.
The filmmakers showed off a critic on Facebook and got a lot of support by their own fanbase. What do you expect. The ones that supported the negative review got blocked. So you know who you deal with here.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe special effects was made by DigiTale Studios. DigiTale Studios is a little company from Germany and well known for their famous work for Game of Thrones; including the famous opener.
- गूफ़In a flashback to WW2, Nazis use the anglicisms "Team" and "Testphase". These terms had not yet become part of common German in the 1940's (and even if they had, would not have been used by Nazis).
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटAfter the credits, there is a fake-trailer for the movie Sky Frogs, followed by a commercial for the game Sky Frogs.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Damnation Defaced: Dead Flesh Four (2021)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Sky Sharks?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- €50,00,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 42 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें