IMDb रेटिंग
3.6/10
2 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अंटार्कटिक की गहरे बर्फ में, भूवैज्ञानिकों की एक टीम एक पुरानी नाजी प्रयोगशाला को उजागर करती है जो अभी भी बरकरार है जहां अंधेरे प्रयोग हुए थे. दुनिया को जीतने के लिए, नाजियों ने संशोधित शार्... सभी पढ़ेंअंटार्कटिक की गहरे बर्फ में, भूवैज्ञानिकों की एक टीम एक पुरानी नाजी प्रयोगशाला को उजागर करती है जो अभी भी बरकरार है जहां अंधेरे प्रयोग हुए थे. दुनिया को जीतने के लिए, नाजियों ने संशोधित शार्क बनाई जो उड़ने में सक्षम थीं.अंटार्कटिक की गहरे बर्फ में, भूवैज्ञानिकों की एक टीम एक पुरानी नाजी प्रयोगशाला को उजागर करती है जो अभी भी बरकरार है जहां अंधेरे प्रयोग हुए थे. दुनिया को जीतने के लिए, नाजियों ने संशोधित शार्क बनाई जो उड़ने में सक्षम थीं.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 2 जीत और कुल 1 नामांकन
Barbara Nedeljakova
- Angelique Richter
- (as Barbara Nedeljáková)
T. Love
- Pierre Colbert
- (as Travis Love)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Sky Shark provides some cheesy and gory fun, but sadly only for the first 30 minutes or so, after that, especially the mid section, strongly loses momentum (explanation over explanation etc.) and I was finally rather bored. With a better script, focused on the action like in the beginning, Sky Sharks could have been a fine cheesy horror experience. Anyway, if Nazi-horror movies like Iron Sky, Frankenstein's Army, Ghosts of War, Blood Vessel, Overlord, Dead Snow and the like, or games like the Castle Wolfenstein franchise, rings a bell, you may give Sky Sharks a try.
Overall, above avg special effects and a pinch of nudity thrown in. Tom Savini, the master of gore effects, brings his magic to this movie. Can't be all bad.
I could write a long detailed review about how bad this movie is, but let me not waste your time. Do not rent, buy, or otherwise watch this trash of a movie. Don't let the shark and zombie effects trick you into watching this mess.
I wanted to like "Sky Sharks" in the same way I wanted to like "Iron Sky 2".
Regrettably, in my view both have one flaw in common. A disjointed story, that tries to squeeze in far too many creative ideas. The end result is a tale that "hot foots it" from one idea to another. There's little in the way of lead in with plot holes so large, you could park a Panzer tank in them.
The result for the poor viewer, is hefty doses, of cognitive dissonance. Or put another way the story's a hot mess.
Other shortcomings include gratuitous, sensationalist violence and sex, that detracted even more from this flick.
On the upside the idea is a novel one, that mixes similar concepts from cheesy films like "Surf Nazi's Must Die (1987)" and the "Sharknado" film franchise. Its a fun, clever, mash up, that could have worked really well with more modest, measured handling.
Equally, some of the visuals are pretty decent too and once again, hint at the potential that lies within this way out and wacky concept.
In summary, this is marginally watchable. That said, if splatter films with lots of clumsy sex scenes, is not really your thing and you like a coherent story, in my opinion this might not be for you.
4/10.
Regrettably, in my view both have one flaw in common. A disjointed story, that tries to squeeze in far too many creative ideas. The end result is a tale that "hot foots it" from one idea to another. There's little in the way of lead in with plot holes so large, you could park a Panzer tank in them.
The result for the poor viewer, is hefty doses, of cognitive dissonance. Or put another way the story's a hot mess.
Other shortcomings include gratuitous, sensationalist violence and sex, that detracted even more from this flick.
On the upside the idea is a novel one, that mixes similar concepts from cheesy films like "Surf Nazi's Must Die (1987)" and the "Sharknado" film franchise. Its a fun, clever, mash up, that could have worked really well with more modest, measured handling.
Equally, some of the visuals are pretty decent too and once again, hint at the potential that lies within this way out and wacky concept.
In summary, this is marginally watchable. That said, if splatter films with lots of clumsy sex scenes, is not really your thing and you like a coherent story, in my opinion this might not be for you.
4/10.
Okay, so it's worth 3.5 / 10 rating, probably, in that the actors all spoke clearly enough to be heard, the script was probably printed ahead of time on paper, no mike booms were visible, and generally the lighting was good enough to see what was happening, most of the time.
My complaint is, there's not NEARLY enough nudity in this picture. I think movies of this ilk could be vastly improved by having just about everyone onscreen do the same performance as before, except naked. They shouldn't acknowledge the nudity, either. They should just do the scene as-is, completely starkers.
This would greatly improve the viewability in that at least the people waiting for nudity will have it, and those interested in the eye candy of the actresses will be able to have their interests met.
My complaint is, there's not NEARLY enough nudity in this picture. I think movies of this ilk could be vastly improved by having just about everyone onscreen do the same performance as before, except naked. They shouldn't acknowledge the nudity, either. They should just do the scene as-is, completely starkers.
This would greatly improve the viewability in that at least the people waiting for nudity will have it, and those interested in the eye candy of the actresses will be able to have their interests met.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe special effects was made by DigiTale Studios. DigiTale Studios is a little company from Germany and well known for their famous work for Game of Thrones; including the famous opener.
- गूफ़In a flashback to WW2, Nazis use the anglicisms "Team" and "Testphase". These terms had not yet become part of common German in the 1940's (and even if they had, would not have been used by Nazis).
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटAfter the credits, there is a fake-trailer for the movie Sky Frogs, followed by a commercial for the game Sky Frogs.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Damnation Defaced: Dead Flesh Four (2021)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Sky Sharks?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- €50,00,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 42 मि(102 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें