Ratter

It could have been good of bad or something in between.

No way to know cuz half of the movie was missing!

...and yes, they left us the boring part only.

The excitement, the character development, the motive, who's the bad guy, etc all absent!

If you like a movie where you have to fill in every hole yourself, then be my guest.

Ashley Benson is beautiful. Now obviously that lies in the eye of the beholder, but most people will agree with this statement, so this is not really news. The movie itself is not really news either though and if you already disagree with the previous statement, then there's almost nothing left for you to watch (literally).

I'm not saying that the movie isn't good at all, what I am saying, is that the premise is far from new and it has been done better, though I don't expect there to be a masterpiece anytime soon. Whatever the case may be and whatever you may think of the "intentions" of the evil person in this or the premise itself: It's not really something that is sustainable for a feature length. Not with a script like that ... no matter how beautiful the main actress is

The only problem I have is the ending why cut it off. Good premise but could have been developed more. Low budget

I honestly don't know if I should recommend this movie. On the one hand, it is interesting precisely from the "I'm following you through devices" side, it keeps you in suspense. The plot develops interestingly, I would like to find out who it is, why he does it, even if he was just interested in watching over random girls, etc. But nuh, film just ended it

Well, the ending was very disappointing, simply because they didn't explain anything, and the end was very smeared and ugly. There are many films about stalking on the Internet, many of them are beautifully designed, have their own beginning and end. And in this film, the stalker just appears out of nowhere, does unreasonable actions, and disappears into nowhere.

If you like the genre, it's better to spend time on "Megan is missing", "Unfriended" or something of that format.

I do not give a bad rating because most of the film was interestingly played, and the presence effect made itself felt, but I will not be able to give such a film a high rating.

Potentially a good film spoiled by having no end.

I have seen thousands of films the last 35 years, but it seems that today film makers are less and less bothered about a good ending. The acting was OK in it, actually deserves a 7, the location looked OK, another 7, The story line and subject was fine, 7 again, but I guess the film maker had no money left over for a normal ending. And that makes it worth a 1. You wouldn't by a car without engine, or a house without a roof, would you? Even an empty bread bag would not pass a till.

I couldn't have cared if she would survived, got killed, turned into a privacy activist or what ever, but pls pls pls, give films an ending.

As from 2010, the difference in a good film or a bad film seems to focus on the end of the story. Imagine: The Green Mile without the end scene between two older people, The sixth sense without explaining at the end that the guy actually was dead all the film long, The Hunger Games missing part 4? That's what the "ratter" is about. Quick and cheap productions without an end... Thanks.