Psychos

Lot of hate for this it seems, mostly justified. What you need to bear in mind though is that all involved are most likely hobbyists or budding film students with pocket money for a budget and going in watching it with high expectations is pretty dumb on your behalf. Points -

* Is it as bad as the rating suggests? Yeah, probably. Generally anything below 3 is a disaster area - I wouldn't quite slap that sticker on this though.

* Story and dialogue are incoherent - Well almost. Yeah the continuity and internal logic are somewhere in outer space, let alone in the ballpark. But the story does hold itself together enough for you to be able to predict the ending (done better repeatedly elsewhere) at about the half way mark, so "incoherent" is not entirely correct.

* They can't act or construct scenes - I agree, but at least the sound and video are fairly OK.

* The gore is laughable - Yes, but it is *micro*budget. It is laughable due to economics, not squeamishness. Not everyone can hire Olaf Ittenbach.

Seriously, if you don't expect anything from tripe like this in the first place, your life will be less painful. What I will say is I found this to be exactly what I needed to watch on my phone at 5am in bed with insomnia. Watched mindlessly in this state it is an acceptable distraction. There are plenty of other films that would just annoy the crap out of you in the same context. This didn't. It is what it is. Crap like this can be mildly enjoyable on occasion.

Firstly why the high rating, this film isn't even worth a three out of ten. Right, the plot,no spoilers but it's about three girls exacting revenge, okay you think like me this is going to be good. WRONG. The film was on for an hour and twenty, that I won't get back. The acting was awful, the plot was awful, just think spit on your grave without the acting, nudity or the blood. Yes when the blood scenes come, there are a few, it's looks totally false and very unrealistic. Do yourself a favor and don't watch this awful movie, choose anything else but this.

I had some hope for this movie as I enjoy movies based on this premise. This movie is almost completely unwatchable. The acting is flat, the lighting itself is terrible (same lighting scheme used no matter the setting), and the script is one of the worst that I have ever heard. If you told me that this was a student film, I would believe you. Then I would suggest that the students that made it learn a bit more about basic editing. I have no idea how anyone was able to rate this 5 or more.

I made it about 3/4 through this film and still had no concept as to the poi t of the movie. The blonde is hit but that's about it. Rated MA? For what? PG rated horror.

Bad, Just bad and pointless.

Psychos (2017) was available on Tubi in June that I caught before they no longer carried the title. The storyline involves three females who were caught and tortured by the same man. Years later they look to track him down and gain revenge by working together.

This movie is directed by Sandy Chukhadarian in her directorial debut and stars Angelica Cassidy (Rollercoaster), Deniele Ramos Cloutier (The Electrician), Aubrey Wakeling (Spanners) and Vince Peagler III (New Merica).

This movie is a travesty. The acting, writing, dialogue and cinematography is awful. The movie feels awkward and unnatural throughout. There's an ax scene in this that was supposed to be the highlight which is also terrible.

Overall this is nothing but a bad addition to the horror genre that I would recommend skipping. I would score this a 2/10.