Dragons of Camelot

Shame I cannot give it zero.

It was partly funny for the first 10 minutes I put up with it.

A cast of few. Terrible, atrocious acting. If you have to watch it insist that you are paid to do so and tied to your chair. That is the only way you will get through it.

The plastic bendy swords are worth watching out for tho, that did give me a chuckle.

Don't waste your time or money.

Polish your shoes or,

Wash your hair

Hard to believe its the same director as Commando and Firestarter. I knew it would be pretty bad, but could not get through it!

Well, maybe I had higher hopes for this one than I should have had. I mean the film isn't completely awful but it's not good. I'd say this is a film to watch ONLY IF there is zero else to watch or do.

This story takes place right when King Arthur dies, Morgana takes over Camelot, Lancelot was banished and both Merlin & Guenevere are imprisoned - the rest of the knights must save Guenevere, Merlin and Camelot. It's new take on the old tale.

I will give them an "E" for Effort, they took the film seriously and did the best they were able to do on a small budget. I normally love quite a few of the "B" films - but this one gets a bit boring (that is my reason for not rating it higher).

4/10

This would have have to be one of the worst movies i have ever wasted my time watching. The battle scenes ? 12 people on each side. Was the budget for this film $100 or less.

Don't waste your time on this,The acting is awful and no name stars. Why do people waste money making such Crap.

The cgi looks like someone cut and pasted Castles onto pictures in the background.The editing is also dreadful.

Please watch something else, don't waste you time on this film. If the actors got paid for this it was a scam. The sets looked like they where made of Foam rubber. Just awful.

Not sure you want to learn about Camelot by way of this movie. So while the filmmaker might have chosen more wisely how and where to spend the little money he had (maybe it's the only story they gave him money for on the other hand), it's still a very low budget movie. So do not expect polished special effects or anything like that.

There is a lot of over the top "acting" (if you can call it that), one not being able to act if his life (or that of the character he's portraying for that matter) depended on it - literally. The props are not really good either, but you can't blame them for trying. People do get killed in a sort of graphic way (there is blood "spilled", digital that is). Even if sometimes you get a bit of nostalgia with this trying to tap into 80s movies and their "group on a mission" mentality it never achieves that.