अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंWhen a charming house guest arrives at a remote castle, the delicate dynamic between a neglectful husband, his innocent bride Cherry, and their devoted maid Hero, is thrown into chaos.When a charming house guest arrives at a remote castle, the delicate dynamic between a neglectful husband, his innocent bride Cherry, and their devoted maid Hero, is thrown into chaos.When a charming house guest arrives at a remote castle, the delicate dynamic between a neglectful husband, his innocent bride Cherry, and their devoted maid Hero, is thrown into chaos.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार्स
- पुरस्कार
- 4 कुल नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This was by far the worst acting, plot, sound quality, and cinematography I have ever seen. I'm just thankful it was a mystery movie night to not have wasted more money.
What was up with the helmets, and cheap costumes and weird expressions. It was so bad you see the main actor lick his lips like a cheesy stripper trying to act sexy.
What was up with the helmets, and cheap costumes and weird expressions. It was so bad you see the main actor lick his lips like a cheesy stripper trying to act sexy.
I'm not sure how else to put it, but this felt like kid's movie, a children's fairytale, something you'd stack next to Cinderella or Goldilocks, except made for adults. That mismatch created a weird disconnect for me. It's like a Disney movie, but with sexual tension... and when you mix Disney-style acting and innocence with horniness, just feels weird.
The story and themes also seemed like a mash-up of plots you've seen before, without adding anything new. Almost everything felt like a rehash of ideas other films have already executed better.
What saves it from being unbearable is that the movie seems somewhat self aware, vibes-wise. It never takes itself too seriously; you see that in the acting, the dialogue, and even the production design. At times, the whole thing looked like a music video extended. You know when an artist turns a 3 minute song into a 7 minute short film? Imagine if Sabrina Carpenter or Charli XCX made a 90 minute version of that. If that sounds appealing, this might be your movie.
I personally struggled to connect with it, especially with the messaging, which boiled down to "Man bad. Men hate women because secretly gay. Woman love woman." It felt like when actors become directors and make their passion project... except here it feels like a musician wrote a film between album releases.
The characters felt distant. You don't need to relate to a character's situation for a story to work, but you do need to feel something for them - and I didn't. It lacked that engaging quality, the kind that allows me to enjoy a gay romcom or a female-centered drama even though I'm neither; and didn't even seem interested in creating it. Like watching the Queen's gambit, I don't care about chess I loved that.
The weak portrayal of the male characters also undermined the female leads. They were so cartoonishly dumb and shallow. Like watching a superhero whose only adversaries are pathetic, there's no real tension or satisfaction in their victory. Here, the only male characters with any sense and morals(i.e. The guards), were relegated way into the background. Every male character with significant screen time/dialogue was not only unlikable, but also shallow, uninteresting, with paper thin personality. In contrast, the women were written with greater depth and intelligence, which made the film's central conflicts feel unbalanced and unconvincing. Like that's who's beating you?
It brought to mind Kang the Conqueror being beat by ants, but in reverse; a victory feels hollow when the opposition is so clearly inferior. There are stories where the "oppressed by the lesser" trope works, like King Kong in chains, Eleven in Stranger Things, the Iron Giant, Samson, Mystique in X-Men; but in those cases the antagonists have actual leverage. Here, the men don't; they're just literal idiots. Made their role as oppressors feel implausible and dramatically inert. So the "victories" feel underwhelming.
I didn't necessarily hate the film, but I also didn't enjoy it. The only thing that kept it tolerable was that it didn't take itself too seriously.
Still, I was massively disappointed especially after waiting in a long line for the letterboxd screening. Luckily, I saw 2 movies last night and the other was much better, so the trip to the theater wasn't a total waste. Honestly should've just gone home after "The Holiday."
The story and themes also seemed like a mash-up of plots you've seen before, without adding anything new. Almost everything felt like a rehash of ideas other films have already executed better.
What saves it from being unbearable is that the movie seems somewhat self aware, vibes-wise. It never takes itself too seriously; you see that in the acting, the dialogue, and even the production design. At times, the whole thing looked like a music video extended. You know when an artist turns a 3 minute song into a 7 minute short film? Imagine if Sabrina Carpenter or Charli XCX made a 90 minute version of that. If that sounds appealing, this might be your movie.
I personally struggled to connect with it, especially with the messaging, which boiled down to "Man bad. Men hate women because secretly gay. Woman love woman." It felt like when actors become directors and make their passion project... except here it feels like a musician wrote a film between album releases.
The characters felt distant. You don't need to relate to a character's situation for a story to work, but you do need to feel something for them - and I didn't. It lacked that engaging quality, the kind that allows me to enjoy a gay romcom or a female-centered drama even though I'm neither; and didn't even seem interested in creating it. Like watching the Queen's gambit, I don't care about chess I loved that.
The weak portrayal of the male characters also undermined the female leads. They were so cartoonishly dumb and shallow. Like watching a superhero whose only adversaries are pathetic, there's no real tension or satisfaction in their victory. Here, the only male characters with any sense and morals(i.e. The guards), were relegated way into the background. Every male character with significant screen time/dialogue was not only unlikable, but also shallow, uninteresting, with paper thin personality. In contrast, the women were written with greater depth and intelligence, which made the film's central conflicts feel unbalanced and unconvincing. Like that's who's beating you?
It brought to mind Kang the Conqueror being beat by ants, but in reverse; a victory feels hollow when the opposition is so clearly inferior. There are stories where the "oppressed by the lesser" trope works, like King Kong in chains, Eleven in Stranger Things, the Iron Giant, Samson, Mystique in X-Men; but in those cases the antagonists have actual leverage. Here, the men don't; they're just literal idiots. Made their role as oppressors feel implausible and dramatically inert. So the "victories" feel underwhelming.
I didn't necessarily hate the film, but I also didn't enjoy it. The only thing that kept it tolerable was that it didn't take itself too seriously.
Still, I was massively disappointed especially after waiting in a long line for the letterboxd screening. Luckily, I saw 2 movies last night and the other was much better, so the trip to the theater wasn't a total waste. Honestly should've just gone home after "The Holiday."
Saw 100 Nights of Hero at an early screening as part of the Regal Mystery Movie. The film focuses on a patriarchal society that uses religion to control women and all aspects of life. It's a tale as old as time, but here, they worship Birdman. Unfortunately, the film can't gain enough steam to take off.
Positives!
+Excellent use of stained glass lighting to express emotions of scenes.
+Cast is sufficient in acting.
+Interesting costume choices.
+Fitting orchestral electronica score.
Negatives!
-Themes are very surface level.
-Lens flare effect on ALL candles!
-Plot jumps between main story and stories within stories without much connection.
-Feels like a school project.
-Scenes are cluttered with objects. Felt like a music video set.
100 Nights of Hero is Okay at best. It feels like a teenage introduction to dealing with the patriarchy and feminism. It wasn't boring, but was certainly unremarkable.
-GremlinLord615!
-Full Review on Youtube!
Positives!
+Excellent use of stained glass lighting to express emotions of scenes.
+Cast is sufficient in acting.
+Interesting costume choices.
+Fitting orchestral electronica score.
Negatives!
-Themes are very surface level.
-Lens flare effect on ALL candles!
-Plot jumps between main story and stories within stories without much connection.
-Feels like a school project.
-Scenes are cluttered with objects. Felt like a music video set.
100 Nights of Hero is Okay at best. It feels like a teenage introduction to dealing with the patriarchy and feminism. It wasn't boring, but was certainly unremarkable.
-GremlinLord615!
-Full Review on Youtube!
Congratulations for making a sapphic book about a man (Galitzine, who hams it up way too much) They ruined it by not sticking to the book and we all know the only reason Charli is in there is because they thought it would build up the hype. Why they thought it would be a good idea releasing this to 823 theatres (which is NOT a limited release) is beyond me. This is nothing more than a vanity project aiming for awards and wildly missing the mark. The acting is mid and the chemistry non existent. It's just bland. Skip.
Parts of the story are gripping, the other parts I slept through. The acting was about as good as one could expect from such a bad script. Is the guy who played the art historian in Downtown Abbey in dire straights? There were far too many contemporary idioms. I've often said when seeing the directorial efforts of Ben Hecht and Preston Sturgis that they should have been chained behind their typewriters. I think the reverse may apply to whoever directed this. The ethnic mix of the cast was suspiciously contemporary for a world that only had muscle power. The plot was difficult to follow because of the time jumps and dream sequences. The one really good thing was the production design. It did look like a different world at a renaissance tech level.
क्या आपको पता है
- साउंडट्रैकOnly Alive
Performed by Purity Ring
Written by Megan James & Corin Roddick
Licensed Courtesy of Purity Ring
Published by Purity Ring
Copyright 2025
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
From Hurry Up Tomorrow to Highest 2 Lowest, take a look back at some of our favorite posters of 2025.
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- 100 ночей Хиро
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $3,24,768
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $2,50,701
- 7 दिस॰ 2025
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $3,24,768
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 31 मि(91 min)
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें






