Hangar 10

There is an easy way to sum up this movie. Say you have a budget of $2,000US and you live near a field. All you need to do is buy a $50 camera at Walmart, ask your friends, "Hey want to be in a Movie and be Famous?" and Adobe CS5.

For the movie run around in the fields and record yourselves screaming for one hour. Then put the video on you laptop and edit.

WAALAA! Instant sensation! Make a commercial of the movie and only show the audience getting scared. Then make a scary cover for you DVD.

Let the sheep buy it! On a lighter note, this is a terrible terrible movie. Please don't torture your eyes and waste your time watching it. Go outside for an hour instead and thank God your alive...

I am typically a fan of found footage movies, especially if they are well done. This one was not.

I was very excited to watch Hangar 10, as I enjoy a good UFO/alien movie. What a disappointment!

I spent most of this movie wondering what the hell was going on. The reason why they were in the woods and their reasoning for doing things was not made very clear. The accents were thick which did not help matters at all.

Overall, the movie was slow and boring, and two of the actors spent half the movie yelling "Gus!!!" which got pretty old.

Unfortunately, all Hangar 10 did for me was waste two hours of my life that I can never get back.

This movie had some things going for it. I think the actors are strong. The special effects, especially at the end, are really good. Also, I like alien found footage movies. They are a little more unique than the supernatural found footage.

The problem is the writing. The dialogue is simplistic. As a result, it is hard to figure out what is going on for most of the second and third acts. This movie has a major problem with character motivation as well. The question of why the characters are there, why they are filming, and why they don't give up just haunt the viewer throughout.

Ufo incident they say ... well another title of the movie. Rendlesham or something. I didn't even research if this is based even losely/remotely on an actual event. Then again, since we now have been told that there have been some unidentified flying objects ... I mean who am I to discredit this, right? Still does not make this movie any good.

Nor the idea of going Found Footage. It is not just too late when it comes to the even itself (why would anyone go there now), but also the "genre" this pics to die on ... and dying it does (no pun inteneded). Not probing to find puns ... they're just there ...

Prepare yourself for about an hour and a half of awful camera-work that is all over the place and just downright annoying. And prepare yourself for an hour and a half of virtually nothing happening aside from three people pretending to be lost in the Woods and then finding an old abandoned hangar.

There are no words that will do justice to the extent of which I loathe this genre of movies; the mockumentary and found footage genre. If you have seen one of them then you have essentially seen all.

I will say that the lights in the sky, as shown in "Hangar 10", was quite good and interesting, and that was actually the best part of the entire movie.

With just three people on the cast list, there was a tremendous performance pressure resting on their shoulders. I will say that the actors and actress did manage to do good enough jobs with the limitations of their limited script.

Once the movie actually manages to shamble to an ending, you just sit there left behind with a foul taste in your mouth, robbed of 83 minutes of living and you just go mmm-hmmmm.

"Hangar 10" is not worth wasting your time or money on. I did it so you don't have to. If you enjoy Sci-Fi or UFO/extraterrestrial lore, stay well clear of this movie.