Hangar 10

Prepare yourself for about an hour and a half of awful camera-work that is all over the place and just downright annoying. And prepare yourself for an hour and a half of virtually nothing happening aside from three people pretending to be lost in the Woods and then finding an old abandoned hangar.

There are no words that will do justice to the extent of which I loathe this genre of movies; the mockumentary and found footage genre. If you have seen one of them then you have essentially seen all.

I will say that the lights in the sky, as shown in "Hangar 10", was quite good and interesting, and that was actually the best part of the entire movie.

With just three people on the cast list, there was a tremendous performance pressure resting on their shoulders. I will say that the actors and actress did manage to do good enough jobs with the limitations of their limited script.

Once the movie actually manages to shamble to an ending, you just sit there left behind with a foul taste in your mouth, robbed of 83 minutes of living and you just go mmm-hmmmm.

"Hangar 10" is not worth wasting your time or money on. I did it so you don't have to. If you enjoy Sci-Fi or UFO/extraterrestrial lore, stay well clear of this movie.

This movie had some things going for it. I think the actors are strong. The special effects, especially at the end, are really good. Also, I like alien found footage movies. They are a little more unique than the supernatural found footage.

The problem is the writing. The dialogue is simplistic. As a result, it is hard to figure out what is going on for most of the second and third acts. This movie has a major problem with character motivation as well. The question of why the characters are there, why they are filming, and why they don't give up just haunt the viewer throughout.

I had read somewhere Hangar 10 had something to do with Severance (the excellent Brit comedy/horror) therefore I was expecting the same director, or writer perhaps, I think I was wrong. First off the acting isn't too bad and the story line is not entirely off point. Too much time most certainly is spent in the woods however and a meandering atmosphere soon sets in. It's obvious the found footage style is here to stay however a real drawback in this movie was the extent of it and the implementation - I really had enough of it. To the point it detracted from the movie unfortunately, and this movie does gain momentum towards the end so that was quite a shame. You'd have to be a real hardcore Sci-Fi fan and not mind headache inducing camera work to enjoy, which is a shame as I think the ingredients were there for an enjoyable movie but did not make it for me. As a comparison Probability of girlfriend enjoying District 9- 100% Hangar 10- 0%.

This has to be the worst found footage film of all time. It's boring. It's slow. It's all over the place. Terrible camera work. Cheap Effects. Bad Acting.

This is an insult to the Rendlesham Forest Incident.

UFO stuff should be scary and have an atmosphere to them, this Hangar 10 garbage has none, not one sign of it.

I have to say again the camera work is terrible, its so shaky, they should not of let the clueless actors hold the camera. What you see on screen is the result of people that have no idea of how to handle a camera.

Don't bother with this so called film, it sucks and more so.

Mike.

There is an easy way to sum up this movie. Say you have a budget of $2,000US and you live near a field. All you need to do is buy a $50 camera at Walmart, ask your friends, "Hey want to be in a Movie and be Famous?" and Adobe CS5.

For the movie run around in the fields and record yourselves screaming for one hour. Then put the video on you laptop and edit.

WAALAA! Instant sensation! Make a commercial of the movie and only show the audience getting scared. Then make a scary cover for you DVD.

Let the sheep buy it! On a lighter note, this is a terrible terrible movie. Please don't torture your eyes and waste your time watching it. Go outside for an hour instead and thank God your alive...