उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं

Very predictable. I knew how it would end before the title card.

OK, jokes aside, this movie was super flat. It left everything very 2 dimensional. Nothing felt really explored.

I remember these incidents, and honestly, I feel I could have written a better movie, with more insight into the events based solely off of my recollection of the news from the event when it happened.

It didn't really answer anything, and felt like it didn't even know what to ask. It was honestly boring, slow, and uninspired.

I didn't go into it with high expectations, but DID know there was a rich bit of storytelling to be had here. Instead, it was barely paint by numbers regurgitation of the story.

Such a poorly made film. The writing and directing in particular are truly bad. Turns out the writer and director are the same clueless man. A Mr Ott. I hope Mr Ott has a day job. Perhaps it is true that morons like McVeigh have no friends, no personality and no prospects. Mindless cowards who find purpose in hate. Yet a movie about a dull witted, friendless, stupid man does not have to be the same. This film is really boring. We gain not one ounce of insight into McVeigh. He is on the phone to somebody. A lot. We never know who. The photography is as bad as the writing. Dull shots framed in dullness. It is hard to say about the actors. They were doing what they were paid to do, which is mostly nothing. It could have been a contender, to try and give the viewers some insight into this mindless and soulless act of murder and destruction, but that did not happen. If you are looking for even the tiniest shred of insight, it is not here. I watched this turkey so you don't have to. Give it a hard pass. You will have missed absolutely nothing. I only gave it a 3 because it is, in a small and sad way, at least an effort at understanding stupid, aimless and lost men like McVeigh. But F for effort.

"McVeigh" (2024) attempts to chronicle the descent of Timothy McVeigh into domestic terrorism, but ultimately fails to provide a compelling or insightful portrayal of its subject. Directed by Mike Ott, the film had the potential to explore the psychological and ideological motivations behind one of the most infamous crimes in American history. Instead, it delivers a hollow, underdeveloped narrative that neither informs nor engages.

One of the film's biggest flaws is its lack of character development. McVeigh's disillusionment with the U. S. government-particularly his anger towards the federal response at Waco-is a crucial aspect of his radicalization, yet the movie barely touches on it. Without a deeper look into his beliefs and frustrations, McVeigh comes across as a one-dimensional figure, reducing the film's impact. The supporting characters are similarly neglected, existing only to move the plot forward rather than adding any real depth or nuance.

As a thriller, McVeigh is disappointingly flat. There's little tension, and the pacing drags, making it a struggle to stay engaged. The lack of emotional weight or psychological insight leaves the film feeling empty, as though it merely goes through the motions without saying anything meaningful. Even Alfie Allen's performance as McVeigh feels restrained, likely due to the script's failure to provide any real substance for him to work with.

Overall, McVeigh squanders its potential. Instead of offering a gripping or thought-provoking look at its subject, it settles for a superficial retelling that neither informs nor captivates. A film tackling such a disturbing and complex event should leave an impact-this one doesn't.

This movie was marketed as a "psychological thriller", yet there was nothing "psychological" or "thrilling" about it.

The film did very little to explain McVeigh and Nichols' backstory, and show us who they were and what they believed. Instead, it stumbles along from scene to scene, almost like they made things up as they went along. And then it just ends.

Overall I found the movie unengaging, uninformative, and boring. It was a half-assed hollow shell of what it should have been. Makes you think they were trying to be "first" instead of "best"

I did think that Anthony Carrigan's performance of Andreas Strassmeir was very good. Too bad the writers couldn't do a better job of telling the whole story, though.

I found this movie McVeigh boring,it was similar to the recent September 5 movie where we don't get to know any of the characters in the story in this case the innocent people ,what they were doing before this guy decided to kill and change everyone's life affected by McVeigh's actions forever. One reviewer said there was no judgement, and sometimes that is a good thing ,but not in this case especially in the heated political times we live in with all the hate in our country right now in 2025,it would have been nice to get a deeper understanding why he did this, of course we know the story, it was about Waco, In the film, it's there but it's vague, shown a few times on TV news footage ,the story should have been told as if none of us know the details from the actual event, and perhaps sending out a warning doing bad things even when you think you're making some good political statement, has consequences...innocent people died including children for McVeigh's political statement. The movie did show, this guy had a black heart ,no emotions,just a waste of a human life,it did show how he got the supplies to make his bomb, but that's where the movie stops, in fact the movie basically ends McVeigh driving off in his rent a moving truck, and then we see some real TV footage of McVeighs domestic terror act....but again the story would have been better if it was a re-enactment of the event as if i knew nothing of the event, where did he park the truck, how did he set it off,etc.what did he do after the event, did he go home and have a beer? His arrest and perhaps even his execution...for me it was just a boring movie, the guy was emotionless ,heartless which i am sure probably in real life he was but that left for a boring movie.

Was really hoping this was cut from the same script-pages as Tony Stone's exceptional "Ted K" (2021), but make no mistake, this is the Lifetime Channel Presents or Edward James Olmos (á la AMERICAN ME) version of the Oklahoma City Bombing and its principal architect. Totally controversy-free, favoring theatrics and creator's liberties (w source material) with the goal of producing conventional, feature-length bio-pic. DNF.

Found out the guy who directed this is seemingly a DailyWire MAGA type which checks out because it's hard to see what actually drew this guy to this story given how little he has to say about it. Weirdly Brett Gelman probably the most compelling presence here which is crazy because he's an unbearable POS (unanimously).

This movie seems to weave a lot of fake into it's story-line... I can not find where McVeigh visited some Richard Snell in prison at all. That seems to be fabricated just like Tim's girlfriend "Cindy" in the story. Far as I can find, he didn't have a girlfriend (past High School days) and claimed to not know how to talk to them. Who was the Fredrick person ?

The dialog/script in the movie is wonky, like any gun person (especially a decorated top shooter in the army) would ever call a handgun magazine a "clip". Only Hollywood does that, certainly not a gun enthusiast that travels in gun circles and cherishes the 2nd Amendment.

How about the scene where the movie protrays Tim as upset over an encounter with a black fellow, and plots to shoot him... I can't find that in any fashion, the film seems to make up stuff as it goes along...

What we do know is Tim was a person that kept to himself for the most part and was laconic with others. This is portrayed excellently in the film and that he bombed a Federal building... that is about all this flick got right... We don't get to see him at Waco being part of the upset folks.

This movie is as much fiction as it is non-fiction, thus why I rate is so low... If you wanted to paint a picture, at least use crayons from the correct box to paint that picture.

Seen this and was stoked. With a good cast but man it was slow as molasses. And I understand slow burns and what not but the writing was just atrocious. That may be too much or too harsh because I've seen way worse but it just seemed that the writing was minimal to say the least. Long drawn out scenes trying to build tension but it just didn't work. Felt bad for the actors a few times because they are all good. Bummer. Six out of ten still because I watched it all.....barely.

Tracey Letts always is good and was able to lead his role, even though it was from a seat the majority of the time. Tough not too see ole Game of Thrones in Alfie.

McVeigh, directed by Mike Ott, is an atmospheric triumph that plunges viewers into the sinister and unsettling world of one of America's most infamous figures, Timothy McVeigh.

It is a cinematic experience that excels in every aspect of atmospheric storytelling. Its gloomy tone is perfectly matched by innovative camerawork that draws the audience into the dark recesses of its protagonist's mind. Coupled with naturalistic acting that breathes life into its characters, the film stands as a great example in creating an immersive and unforgettable narrative. McVeigh is a testament to the power of film to explore the darkest corners of the human psyche, leaving an indelible mark on all who dare to enter its shadowy world.

Appropriately bleak & cold true-tale "McVeigh" chronicles the months prior to domestic terrorist Timothy McVeigh (Alfie Allen) killing 167 folk (inc 19 children) in the cowardly 1995 truck-bombing of an Oklahoma Federal Govt building. Co-writer (with first-timer Alex Gioulakis) / director Mike Ott evokes decent foreboding as McVeigh & accomplice Terry Nichols (Brett Gelman) build their bomb with no apparent direct support or direction from the wider neo-nazi community represented by Tracy Letts & Anthony Carrigan - tho Ott does ambiguously hint at that possibility. Well performed & well made, it still leaves the feeling that this awful story has more layers to it that are yet to be told.

If a movie could actually be beyond boring, this would be it. Timothy McVeigh had to be more interesting than he is portrayed here because in this movie he barely exists. Alfie Allen was an extremely poor choice to play McVeigh because while he is given nothing at all to do on screen, he is too old to play McVeigh and looks nothing like him. The film is just a montage of trailers, dated wood paneling , seedy bars and diners. We learn nothing about McVeigh or anyone else. The entire movie is the lead up to the bombing but virtually nothing happens. For some reason a romance is thrown in that I don't think happened and Allen as McVeigh just seems to wander from place to place looking miserable, disturbed and suspicious. The movie is so poorly made I had no idea who the characters were suppose to be in real life. There is very little dialogue, and it seems as if they decided recreating a time period was enough. An awful film with zero redeeming qualities.

Standing around and being quiet for an hour and a half doesn't make a good movie. These people had no idea what genre of movie they were making. They needed to explain these peoples thought process why they did what they did and give details of how they did it not drawn out, silences, trying to make suspense out of a true life story that people already know it's not a horror movie.

I can only wonder what this script must've look like drawn out silence... Drawn out silence... What should we do here? Let's have some people just stare at each other to try to build suspense... Most people were worried they would get details wrong. They didn't get details wrong. They got the plot to the movie wrong.

Deep. Carefully slow. Studied.

It's not the topic. Do we really need to hear this story, now? Yes. Not the facts. It's the story and how you tell it.

Amazing how they draw you in, making no assumptions or judgments, and you are on the edge of your seat, watching, waiting. No villains, no heroes, no sides.

Alfie Allen is amazing. Stoic but paddling like mad underneath. Watch the reflections, the rear view mirrors, the TV.

Pay attention to what is unsaid, the unseen. Who is he calling from the payphone? Why focus on Terry in the scene with Faust? Who gets into the truck with McVeigh?

I left with more questions than answers but fascinated enough to want to know more. A great watch.

Aside from the movie being drab and monotonous and extremely boring, there was nothing psychological or thrilling about this abysmal narrative of the most horrific act of domestic terrorism on US soil.

I'd say 90 percent of the movie was ficticious. McVeigh never visited or corresponded with white supremacist Snell. There was no Cindy character in his life. In fact he was a constant failure in finding a girlfriend in his life.

There is no indication of a Fredric character being real.

They needed to do a much better job than they did with this movie. To me McVeigh was depicted as a sad and lonely man. In fact I think the creator of this movie either purposefully or inadvertently cast a sympathetic shadow over McVeigh.

Absolutely an appalling job with this piece of junk.

They couldn't even bother making a dedication to all the victims of this horrible act of terror!