Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy

'Bridget Jones: Mad About The Boy (2025)' is very different to its predecessors, much more sombre and more contemplative. Rather than struggling with beauty standards and societal pressures, Bridget struggles with grief and coming to terms with a world which no longer has Mr. Darcy in it. Set four years after his untimely demise, the film puts enough distance between his death and its events that it isn't constantly consumed by sadness, focusing more on the reality of what happens just after the period of time usually covered by stories concerning tragedy. This allows the affair to totally avoid being dour, and it isn't even all that downbeat. It naturally fluctuates between making you laugh and making you cry, its general sadness counterbalanced by momentary happiness and the understanding that life has to go on and that there's nothing wrong with that. The central drama isn't so much 'boy' (Leo Woodall) vs 'man' (Chiwetel Ejiofor) insofar as a love triangle is concerned (the men share only a single scene), but instead one of Bridget learning to accept the absence of her husband and to live her life again. There are romantic elements of course, but this is the least 'rom-com' in the traditional sense of all the Bridget movies. It also might just be the best. Renée Zellweger is really solid as the lead character, easily slipping back into the role that arguably defines her career, and it's a treat to see characters (including Hugh Grant's Daniel Cleaver, who is pretty much unchanged by the year-long period in which he was declared dead but was actually stranded on an island somewhere, and Emma Thompson's frank-as-always Dr. Rawlings) and locations and even character setups from its predecessors. It's pretty funny and it's pretty moving. In fact, it's pretty much everything it needs to be. It does feel a little long, and certain elements in its third act feel rather rushed. Plus, Bridget doesn't have the strongest chemistry with one of the men (I won't spoil which) and some aspects of the picture feel more obligatory than natural. Still, it's a really solid sequel that examines relatable and important themes in an effective way. It totally justifies its existence.

There was a time when Bridget Jones's Baby felt like the perfect send-off for our favorite clumsy, charming, and endlessly relatable heroine. So when Mad About the Boy was announced, there was a mix of excitement and hesitation. Did we really need another Bridget Jones movie? Was this going to undo the closure we had? But as soon as the film starts, you realize-there's still more to tell. And more importantly, there's still more to feel.

This final chapter of Bridget's journey is a bittersweet one. It deals with grief, loss, and moving forward in life even when it feels impossible. The film beautifully captures the struggle of giving yourself a second chance, of learning how to heal while still carrying love for the past. If you've followed Bridget since the very first film, you'll feel every bit of her emotions. She's still the Bridget we love, but she's more mature now, wiser, a little less clumsy, a little more self-assured. Life has shaped her, as it does to all of us. And that's what makes her story so heartbreakingly real-she's growing, changing, adapting, but at her core, she's still Bridget.

And honestly, this couldn't have worked without Renée Zellweger. There is no Bridget Jones without her. She slips back into the role like she never left, embodying every awkward entrance, every grand gesture, and even the tiniest mannerisms-the nervous smiles, the way she tilts her head when receiving bad news-it's all still so Bridget. Zellweger's performance is nothing short of stunning. She is Bridget Jones, and no other rom-com character can ever quite match what she brings to this franchise.

The film also introduces new love interests-Roxster (Leo Woodall) and Mr. Wallaker (Chiwetel Ejiofor). They bring fresh dynamics to Bridget's life, but they don't quite match the charm and chemistry that Mark Darcy or Daniel Cleaver once had. Roxster is fun but a little two-dimensional, existing more to push Bridget's journey forward rather than being a compelling character himself. Mr. Wallaker, on the other hand, is serious-maybe a little too serious. Unlike Mark Darcy, who had a dry wit that balanced Bridget's chaos, Wallaker feels a bit plain. It's hard to imagine him truly being the one for Bridget.

But Mad About the Boy isn't just about romance. It's about life. It's about parenting-the struggles of balancing kids, work, and personal happiness. It's about friendships-because Bridget wouldn't be Bridget without her loyal, slightly chaotic circle of friends. The film reminds us how much friends shape our lives, offering love, support, and, of course, comic relief. And speaking of comedy, the humor here is just right-not too over-the-top, not forced, just classic Bridget Jones wit.

That said, while the film gives us a solid and heartfelt ending to Bridget's story, the final scene feels a little... abrupt. It's good, but it's not as satisfying as it could have been. After everything Bridget has been through, she deserved a stronger, more definitive farewell.

Verdict Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy is like Avengers: Endgame for our aunts and moms. It's a long-lost reunion that feels earned, deserved, and deeply emotional. Best sequel since Bridget Jones's Baby, this is the perfect film to watch with a cup of hot chocolate, wrapped in a blanket, feeling all the feelings. Bridget Jones, thank you for everything.

Renée Zellweger was just past 30 for the first Bridget Jones movie, now she will turn 56 later this year, 2025. Today is Valentines Day and it seemed fitting that my wife and I decided to watch this movie, released just yesterday, streaming on Peacock.

It has a very slow start, we both looked at each other after about one-half hour and said, "Are you enjoying this?" We weren't and both hoped it would soon get good. All the characters were annoying and inappropriate, even the kids. In one scene the little girl is running around the house and banging on a pot for the longest. In social gatherings all the lady friends are intrusive and most of the interactions are silly. Fortunately, by tolerating all that it did pick up during its second half.

As this story starts Bridget's husband died in an unfortunate accident four years earlier, leaving her with a young son and an even younger daughter. She was still trying to cope and had not been back to her job as a TV show producer. All her friends wanted to know when she would find a man. One even started her a dating ap.

Later, as the story winds down, good things start to happen for Bridget and the kids. The son is worried that he might forget his dad and his science teacher helps by reassuring him that his dad is everywhere, his energy is, because energy can neither be created or destroyed, it just changes its form.

I would watch the second half again, but NOT the first half, neither interesting nor entertaining. And I did just that, a few weeks later. I started at the middle and the second half is an excellent one-hour movie.

Later I got the DVD from my public library and re-watched the original Bridget Jones movie. The closing credits of this movie contains a number of still shots from that original.

I didn't think I would love this movie as much as I did. I laughed, I cried and the nostalgic factor was chefs kiss! I love that it dealt with real life issues like grief, single motherhood and feeling like you are always failing at life. I also enjoyed the nostalgic factor. I feel like for not being in theaters, this was a wonderful movie with a beautiful soundtrack and amazing actors! Although this movie dealt with serious topics, there was also some very cute comedic relief sprinkled in. You won't regret the watch if you loved the Bridget Jones Diaries movies. I would absolutely recommend it!

The original Bridget Jones was a refreshing, likeable , classy and breezy comedy with an impeccable (accent) by Renee Zellweger, ably supported by Hugh Grant and Colin Firth. I have watched it many times over the years and certainty felt this should have remained a stand alone film. However, the money beckoned and I didn't bother with the previous two films and having heard it's light and fun we watched the fourth instalment.

It turns out to be a lame and lazy concoction rehash of the first film with posh North London types, a bland and soulless sub plot involving a biology student that goes nowhere, Bridget and her irritating kids stuck up a tree and a unfunny scene of a dog in a pond saved by aforementioned bland man. They even rehash scenes from the first film during the end credits.

Hugh Grant injects some humour and he is fast becoming an effective middle aged actor (the patchy Heretic, the villain in the sublime Paddington 2) .

Sadly Ms Zellwegers' face , like Nic Kidman, is such a distraction that it takes one out the film. Part of the beauty of the fist B. J was her naturalness in looks, now she looks strained and comical; even creepy.

Enough now Working Title!