[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
IMDbPro

Listening

  • 2014
  • Not Rated
  • 1 घं 38 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
5.6/10
3.3 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
Thomas Stroppel in Listening (2014)
Trailer for Listening
trailer प्ले करें1:48
2 वीडियो
4 फ़ोटो
Sci-Fiड्रामाथ्रिलर

अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA team of genius-but-broke grad students invent mind-reading technology that destroys their lives and threatens the future of free will itself.A team of genius-but-broke grad students invent mind-reading technology that destroys their lives and threatens the future of free will itself.A team of genius-but-broke grad students invent mind-reading technology that destroys their lives and threatens the future of free will itself.

  • निर्देशक
    • Khalil Sullins
  • लेखक
    • Khalil Sullins
  • स्टार
    • Thomas Stroppel
    • Artie Ahr
    • Amber Marie Bollinger
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    5.6/10
    3.3 हज़ार
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • Khalil Sullins
    • लेखक
      • Khalil Sullins
    • स्टार
      • Thomas Stroppel
      • Artie Ahr
      • Amber Marie Bollinger
    • 35यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 15आलोचक समीक्षाएं
    • 35मेटास्कोर
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
    • पुरस्कार
      • 2 जीत और कुल 4 नामांकन

    वीडियो2

    Listening
    Trailer 1:48
    Listening
    Listening (Official Trailer)
    Trailer 1:47
    Listening (Official Trailer)
    Listening (Official Trailer)
    Trailer 1:47
    Listening (Official Trailer)

    फ़ोटो3

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार41

    बदलाव करें
    Thomas Stroppel
    Thomas Stroppel
    • David Thorogood
    Artie Ahr
    • Ryan Cates
    Amber Marie Bollinger
    • Jordan
    Christine Haeberman
    Christine Haeberman
    • Melanie
    Steve Hanks
    Steve Hanks
    • Matthews
    Arn Chorn-Pond
    • Head Monk
    John Alexenko
    John Alexenko
    • Detective
    Araceli Almaguer
    • Scientist
    Dave Bean
    Dave Bean
    • Listener
    Sarah Beguiristain
    • Waitress
    Pamela Cedar
    • Sharon
    Kalim Chandler
    • Young Scientist
    Timothy Lee Conley
    Timothy Lee Conley
    • Frank
    Jonathan Cousens
    Jonathan Cousens
    • Listener
    • (as Jonathan Adam Cousens)
    J.R. Craig
    • Police Officer
    Gene Dixon
    • Detective
    Buddy Daniels Friedman
    Buddy Daniels Friedman
    • Suspicious Man
    • (as Buddy Friedman)
    Josh Graham
    • David's Listener
    • निर्देशक
      • Khalil Sullins
    • लेखक
      • Khalil Sullins
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं35

    5.63.3K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    6subxerogravity

    Great premise, but very lackluster in the delivery

    The movie reminds me a lot of Primer, but Listening tries to take it up one more level. While the concept in Primer seems mostly talk, this movie movies around with you a lot more.

    A group of broke college students sacrifice everything for their experiment to harness the power of the mind. In a lot of ways the story works like the social network. Two kids who come up with a great idea, and everything is cool until they figure out they changed the world, and in that moment they change (Although the movie attempts to put morals behind the change) The philosophy of the movie is pretty cool, but at times feels like it's going all over the place which makes the movie seem longer than it really is. I actually love very low budget Hard Sci-Fi films like this one that fully draw the fiction from actual fact, but there are moments where the movie bites off more than it can chew, Ironically, not with the Science part, but with the social commentary about young genius who create something they loose control of.

    I did love the story and the characters in the story, no matter what, everyone was likable and you want to root for them throughout, but I would wait to stream this online one a day when you have nothing better to do.
    5peterp-450-298716

    Cyberpunk at its best, with a few flaws in it. An interesting topic that will encourage some debates.

    "You're trying to read the contents of an entire library by walking through the aisles. You gotta open the books to know what's really going on inside."

    What if someone else could read your mind? Does that thought scare you off ? Or can you see some perspectives and opportunities in this technology? And how long would it take before a government would order their secret service to focus on it and obtain the required technology ? Before you know it, you're in the middle of a "Big Brother" situation. You're not only monitored visually, but also your personal thoughts are intercepted. Or worse, a certain dictatorial mindset is being penetrated into your consciousness. Every power-hungry nutcase starts drooling after seeing this method. That's the basic idea of "Listening". A technological innovation with far-reaching effects mixed with a personal crisis.

    Ultimately, my general feeling about "Listening" is of a disappointed nature. The film had so much potential and opportunities, but because of some faint situations and a fairly implausible denouement, it's reduced to a laudable attempt. Let there be no doubt, the original idea is far from bad. A revolutionary development in the neurological sector, realistically portrayed with an abundance of technical equipment and commented upon in a complicated jargon. Although the latter tends to sound like outright gibberish sometimes. Could this technology be achieved in reality, this clearly would lead to the bankruptcy of the mobile telephony industry.

    Most of the scenes take place in a messy garage. However, these are the most compelling fragments in this film. Also they used a remarkable wide range of colors. The various chapters are filmed in a different flashy color. This requires some adjustment and it started me worrying about the color scheme of my television. Every time a blue, red or yellow fragment appeared, I checked my settings. But in the end this gave the film its own personal touch. The disadvantage of a low-budget film is of course the low budget (how surprising) what leads to a limited use of stunning visual effects. This becomes abundantly clear with the stereoscopic images during a telepathic connection.

    The only things remaining are the characters and the philosophy behind the story. The core idea behind the story is crucial in order to make a low-budget movie successful. If it doesn't look impressive, the story must be intriguing enough to make it interesting. As I said earlier, the idea was interesting enough and had plenty of material to provoke discussions. I can imagine that this will be debated widely.

    Unfortunately, the whole is a bit weakened by the poor worked-out personal problems that David (Thomas Stroppel) and Ryan (Artie Ahr) are facing. There are also a few illogical things and there are some unfortunate developments. I thought it was a bit cheap that the first used telepathic thoughts were of an erotic nature. An attempt to substantiate the theory that a man is thinking about that, most of the time ? And the fact that an ancient Buddhist meditation method is able to withstand this high-tech magic, was a bit too easy. And safety precautions during the grand finale were a joke. But besides these tiny flaws, this was a not so unkind cyberpunk movie.

    More reviews here : http://bit.ly/1KIdQMT
    8timnchrist

    Lived up to its award-winning status.

    This director's debut film exceeded my expectations. LISTENING is a suspense-filled sci-fi film that's fast-paced, entertaining and did live up to its award-winning status! It never had down-time and kept entertaining right up till the end. The story-line had multiple levels with lots of twists, turns and intrigue. The moral implications of the movie's subject matter technology (mind reading) makes for a very interesting premise too. The acting was great and several hit it out of the ball park. You'll find yourself routing for the actors as their struggle unfolds, and the actress who turns out to be the home-wrecker is an attractive addition to the cast. One of the main actors (David) did a good job, but had a couple of scenes that I wished were redone to make him more believable, but I'm splitting hairs, he did a great job over-all. The cinematography was very good, interesting and intriguing. The use of lens flares at times made you feel like you were seeing the film through ones own eyes, live! Very well done! I expect more great things from this young director, and look forward to his future efforts. I would recommend this film to anyone who likes a good suspense-filled flick, and very thought-provoking in its delivery. See the movie, you'll be happy you did!
    7ericnottelling

    better than the rating suggests but not top tier

    Not a bad premise for a movie, and it's production value is pretty good. However it's not highly rated for a reason. Where this movie falls part is not so much in the concept per say, but in the expression of it. The script writing is not B rated, but it surely isn't driving the story. There are parts where you wonder, if it had better acting would the script have come off better. As it stands there are some parts where it seems amateurish both in the writing and the acting. There are some movies where bad actors can be uplifted by a good script (matrix) and rarely good actors can pump up a bad script (think Ray Harryhausen or any martial arts movie). This film is neither and they both seem to sink each other equally. As the writing degrades so goes the acting, as none of the actors were good enough to hold it up. Yet in the instances where the script is good the bad acting isn't so apparent. What makes the movie watchable is the concept. The concept of what they are trying to discuss and it's moral implications draw your interest. It helps set a frame work that at least makes the movie watchable. It would be interesting to know the total budget of this movie. It surely isn't block buster...but it also does not appear on the low end like a Primer. Although I think the movie would have been better suited to have more of a primer set up, disusing things cryptically and leaving in some mystery till you get into the movie. IF you like sci fi movies it's a decent sci fi watch on a boring night with nothing else to do. However, I wouldn't go dropping $7 on a ticket for it.
    8emberstonepierce

    A real 'Diamond in the Rough'.

    This is an excellent film which tackles some very interesting moral questions in an understandable and entertaining way. It's rare to see such a strong narrative which holds your interest for the entire film. With surprisingly good production values and some great casting choices, this really is a 'Diamond in the Rough'. There are plenty of twists and turns in the plot, which deals with basic human freedoms and ethics - even though it can seem a little slow at the start. If you stick with this movie and give it a chance, you'll find yourself drawn into a world of secrets, espionage and brain-computer interfacing. If you enjoy films that pose interesting moral dilemmas and aren't just full of action, stunts and CGI effects, this title is one of the best I've seen in quite a while and I'd recommend it highly.

    इस तरह के और

    The Discovery
    6.2
    The Discovery
    Lonesome Dove Church
    5.3
    Lonesome Dove Church
    His Last Wife
    3.2
    His Last Wife
    Limbo
    4.9
    Limbo
    Pipeline
    2.7
    Pipeline
    Road to Red
    3.6
    Road to Red
    Meltdown
    3.8
    Meltdown
    Lifechanger
    5.4
    Lifechanger
    Night Mistress
    3.3
    Night Mistress
    The Murder of Fred Hampton
    7.6
    The Murder of Fred Hampton
    Let's Scare Julie
    3.3
    Let's Scare Julie
    Loophole
    6.0
    Loophole

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      Parts of the Buddhist monk scenes were shot on location at Ankor Watt Temple in Cambodia.
    • गूफ़
      While sitting on the porch, Jordan's legs go from crossed to uncrossed and then back again.
    • साउंडट्रैक
      Get That Money
      Written by Peter Smith

      Performed by Peter Pastel and The Break Neck Crew

      Courtesy of Break Yo' Self Records

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 11 सितंबर 2015 (यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
      • कंबोडिया
    • आधिकारिक साइट
      • Official site
    • भाषा
      • अंग्रेज़ी
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • Brainstorm
    • फ़िल्माने की जगहें
      • Cambodia(on location)
    • उत्पादन कंपनी
      • Listen Film
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      1 घंटा 38 मिनट
    • रंग
      • Color
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 2.35 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.