अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA high-powered CEO puts her career and family on the line when she begins a torrid affair with her much-younger intern.A high-powered CEO puts her career and family on the line when she begins a torrid affair with her much-younger intern.A high-powered CEO puts her career and family on the line when she begins a torrid affair with her much-younger intern.
- पुरस्कार
- 9 जीत और कुल 25 नामांकन
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Babygirl' has received mixed reactions, with critics praising Nicole Kidman's performance and the film's exploration of complex themes. Audience reactions are divided, with some appreciating the provocative narrative and strong performances, while others find it messy and unrealistic. Cinematography and direction are highlighted as strengths, but the story and character development are criticized for being underdeveloped and predictable. Overall, 'Babygirl' is seen as thought-provoking with strong performances, though it may not appeal to all viewers.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
What really carries this film are the two excellent central performances from Nicole Kidman and Harris Dickinson. Without them, this film would be entirely forgettable, particularly because this film doesn't really break new ground in its genre and the plot is thin. Sophie Wilde and Antonio Banderas are also good in their supporting roles. Kidman is great in portraying a woman who wants to sink into her desires, but is constantly conflicted in doing so.
The score, soundtrack, atmosphere, the costumes Kidman wears, and cinematography all really elevate this film. The film feels very cold and aloof, which is in keeping with our protagonist. As alluded to earlier, the film's biggest issue is that the story is tenuous and not really anything new. It's surprisingly tame for what it is. It almost felt like the film was self-conscious and scared to really go there and be prurient. But perhaps that was intentional, to mirror Romy's reluctance to go there herself. While there is some nudity, it never really feels sexy. Perhaps that was the director's intent though. While sex scenes in erotic thrillers tend to be sexy, passionate, salacious, almost fantastical, the sex scenes in this film feel very organic, and even awkward at times. Between Romy and Samuel there are awkward silences, confusions as to what to do next, insecurities about intimacy. The result is that you feel like a fly on the wall. However, as a viewer, that is both positive and negative. Positive because it feels realistic, perhaps relatable. But negative because much of the film is difficult to watch. What really would have elevated this film is fleshing out Romy's past and her dark desires.
A nitpick I had with the film is regarding Samuel's tattoos. It felt like he was a walking bad-boy stereotype; the tats felt a bit too on-the-nose and obvious. Dickinson's presence alone was sufficient enough to signal to the audience his dark, dominant interiority. Dovetailing off of that point: while it was refreshing to see a power dynamic in a film wherein the younger of the two parties has the power, as it's typically portrayed as being the inverse, the abrupt jump from new intern to a forbidden affair with his boss was jarring and implausible, if we are to believe this film takes place in reality. But the director's conceit here very well may be a heightened version of reality, a fantasy.
That being said, the film is worth checking out, if only for the great acting.
The score, soundtrack, atmosphere, the costumes Kidman wears, and cinematography all really elevate this film. The film feels very cold and aloof, which is in keeping with our protagonist. As alluded to earlier, the film's biggest issue is that the story is tenuous and not really anything new. It's surprisingly tame for what it is. It almost felt like the film was self-conscious and scared to really go there and be prurient. But perhaps that was intentional, to mirror Romy's reluctance to go there herself. While there is some nudity, it never really feels sexy. Perhaps that was the director's intent though. While sex scenes in erotic thrillers tend to be sexy, passionate, salacious, almost fantastical, the sex scenes in this film feel very organic, and even awkward at times. Between Romy and Samuel there are awkward silences, confusions as to what to do next, insecurities about intimacy. The result is that you feel like a fly on the wall. However, as a viewer, that is both positive and negative. Positive because it feels realistic, perhaps relatable. But negative because much of the film is difficult to watch. What really would have elevated this film is fleshing out Romy's past and her dark desires.
A nitpick I had with the film is regarding Samuel's tattoos. It felt like he was a walking bad-boy stereotype; the tats felt a bit too on-the-nose and obvious. Dickinson's presence alone was sufficient enough to signal to the audience his dark, dominant interiority. Dovetailing off of that point: while it was refreshing to see a power dynamic in a film wherein the younger of the two parties has the power, as it's typically portrayed as being the inverse, the abrupt jump from new intern to a forbidden affair with his boss was jarring and implausible, if we are to believe this film takes place in reality. But the director's conceit here very well may be a heightened version of reality, a fantasy.
That being said, the film is worth checking out, if only for the great acting.
It's a drama about sexual fantasy and control set in December in modern New York City. The family in question is 50-ish high-powered executive Romy Mathis (Nicole Kidman), her Broadway play director husband, Jacob (Antonio Banderas), and their two teenage daughters, Isabel (Esther McGregor) and Nora (Vaughan Reilly). Romy is highly successful and innovative at her job but sexually unsatisfied in her marriage.
Romy meets Samuel (Harris Dickinson), a 25-ish intern at her company, who she is attracted to because of his assertive behavior. His behavior and her fantasies collide in a relationship with predictable problems, including Samuel also dating Romy's assistant, Esme (Sophie Wilde). After things get out of control, there is climactic conflict and resolution.
"Babygirl" is a virtuoso Nicole Kidman performance. That's the best that I can say for the film. Harris Dickinson is adequate as a manipulative jerk, as is Antonio Banderas as a preoccupied husband. Esther McGregor has a nice little subplot in the film. "Babygirl" is no feminist movie, and there are no attractive characters. The film's ending is superficial and ludicrous. The cinematography is creative at points, and the sex scenes are not graphic. However, any "truth" in "Babygirl" is lost in the unrealistic ending.
Romy meets Samuel (Harris Dickinson), a 25-ish intern at her company, who she is attracted to because of his assertive behavior. His behavior and her fantasies collide in a relationship with predictable problems, including Samuel also dating Romy's assistant, Esme (Sophie Wilde). After things get out of control, there is climactic conflict and resolution.
"Babygirl" is a virtuoso Nicole Kidman performance. That's the best that I can say for the film. Harris Dickinson is adequate as a manipulative jerk, as is Antonio Banderas as a preoccupied husband. Esther McGregor has a nice little subplot in the film. "Babygirl" is no feminist movie, and there are no attractive characters. The film's ending is superficial and ludicrous. The cinematography is creative at points, and the sex scenes are not graphic. However, any "truth" in "Babygirl" is lost in the unrealistic ending.
I can handle steamy scenes when they serve a purpose. But Babygirl isn't erotic. It's clinical. Like the director thought, "What if we filmed Nicole Kidman's pores having an existential crisis?" Close-up after close-up of heavy breathing, trembling lips, and... other activities..
The plot? Something about power dynamics and forbidden desire. Couldn't tell you much, because the camera was too busy playing dermatologist on Kidman's cheekbones to bother with pesky things like dialogue or character development. At one point, I swear the lens was so far up her personal space that I could see her thoughts.
Kidman commits, because she's a legend. But this isn't Eyes Wide Shut artistry-it's Fifty Shades of Yawn with a Criterion Collection filter. The movie mistakes uncomfortable for deep, and lingering for meaningful. By the 17th prolonged sigh into the abyss of a candlelit close-up, I was sighing too-out of sheer exhaustion.
Skip unless you're really into ASMR for people who think "slow cinema" means "let's watch paint dry... but make it horny.
The plot? Something about power dynamics and forbidden desire. Couldn't tell you much, because the camera was too busy playing dermatologist on Kidman's cheekbones to bother with pesky things like dialogue or character development. At one point, I swear the lens was so far up her personal space that I could see her thoughts.
Kidman commits, because she's a legend. But this isn't Eyes Wide Shut artistry-it's Fifty Shades of Yawn with a Criterion Collection filter. The movie mistakes uncomfortable for deep, and lingering for meaningful. By the 17th prolonged sigh into the abyss of a candlelit close-up, I was sighing too-out of sheer exhaustion.
Skip unless you're really into ASMR for people who think "slow cinema" means "let's watch paint dry... but make it horny.
Nicole Kidman is giving a performance in "Babygirl" that no doubt many people will be calling "brave," mostly because it suggests that women over the age of 50 (gasp!) like to have sex and maybe even like to get kinky once in a while.
She does give a good performance, and it's the movie's biggest selling point. It's a shame that by the time the film is over her performance has been diluted by a muddled screenplay that doesn't know what it wants to say about gender dynamics or the sexual power play between men and women. Maybe confusion is the point, because Kidman's character doesn't completely know what she wants. She enjoys her place as a powerful female leader in the professional world, but she also enjoys relinquishing that power in the bedroom and giving into submissive fantasies. But only up to a point -- submissiveness for women can quickly veer into uncomfortable territory if taken too far by the man they're with. Scary can be fun, but after a certain line is crossed, scary is just scary.
I applaud a film that's honest about female sexuality, but I wish the topic had been given a better movie than this.
Grade: B.
She does give a good performance, and it's the movie's biggest selling point. It's a shame that by the time the film is over her performance has been diluted by a muddled screenplay that doesn't know what it wants to say about gender dynamics or the sexual power play between men and women. Maybe confusion is the point, because Kidman's character doesn't completely know what she wants. She enjoys her place as a powerful female leader in the professional world, but she also enjoys relinquishing that power in the bedroom and giving into submissive fantasies. But only up to a point -- submissiveness for women can quickly veer into uncomfortable territory if taken too far by the man they're with. Scary can be fun, but after a certain line is crossed, scary is just scary.
I applaud a film that's honest about female sexuality, but I wish the topic had been given a better movie than this.
Grade: B.
This is not the movie I was hoping for. It felt awkward at times, with cringe worthy scenes. As much as I enjoyed Nicole Kidman, Harris Dickinson was not enjoyable for me on screen. I felt like it could have been sexier, and more kink satisfying. I literally laughed at some scenes when I should have enjoyed them. A theme I'm into, but this wasn't it for me. Antonio Banderas was a perfect fit for the part! You felt for the husband, and i bought his pain. I really wish this would have been better, but as it is, I don't think I'd care to ever watch it again.
Saw in theaters at AMC with Nicole on 12-27-2024.
Saw in theaters at AMC with Nicole on 12-27-2024.
Nicole Kidman Has Been Craving a Film Like 'Babygirl'
Nicole Kidman Has Been Craving a Film Like 'Babygirl'
Go behind the scenes of Babygirl with stars Nicole Kidman, Harris Dickinson, and writer-director Halina Reijn in this exclusive interview.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाINXS's "Never Tear Us Apart" is used during one of the erotic scenes, but distributor A24 struggled to get the rights for it. Director Halina Reijn loved the scene with the song and tried many other songs, but nothing worked. After a few sleepless nights, she complained about the situation to Nicole Kidman, who told Reijn to give her a couple of days. Kidman then managed to secure the rights.
- गूफ़Samuel has a cross tattoo on the left side of his chest in the first intimate hotel encounter with Romy, but it's not there at all when he dances for her in another hotel room scene later in the movie.
- साउंडट्रैकMommy's Dollhouse
Composed by Cristobal Tapia de Veer & Kim Neundorf
Orchestrated by William Marsey
Soprano: Nichole Dechaine
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Babygirl: Deseo pohibido
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- न्यूयॉर्क शहर, न्यूयॉर्क, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(street scenes)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $2,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $2,81,96,732
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $44,90,145
- 29 दिस॰ 2024
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $6,45,72,596
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 54 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.00 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें