4 समीक्षाएं
- nogodnomasters
- 29 जुल॰ 2020
- परमालिंक
If you enjoy listening to men using the F word like 200 times, this movie is for you. It's pitifully cast, bad diologue, bad writing, bad acting, bad directing. At one point, in 2 minutes, the bald guy racks a round 4 separate times with his shotgun, for dramatic effect, even though he never fired a shot. Another fires a. 44 numerous times with no kick at all. In reality, those shots would all but deafen you, but it's a soft sound in this crap movie. Just awful.
- jagoffjones
- 14 अग॰ 2025
- परमालिंक
So this movie does have a lot of flaws. The acting is stiff and so is the dialogue. But I do give it credit that it has a lot of zombies in it. Real zombies too, not fast running fake zombies. Has a lot of cheap gore, like fake intestines being eaten. Could have used better gun effects and headshots, but that cost money and like I said it looks like this movie cost about 20 bucks to make. They did a good job having a lot of zombies on the screen at the same time. Also it had pretty constant action. I have seen much worse zombie movies. This does not deserve the 3 rating it has.
- jamescreelman-51649
- 9 सित॰ 2021
- परमालिंक
A bit above average zombie entry from what I've seen lately pass as a zombie movie with a bit of throwback to the 80's zombie / slasher / horror movies in general.
Are there some flaws in this movie, yes, does it warrant the low 3.2 rating at the time of this writing, no, I really don't think so. Some of the dialogue, acting and audio, even special effects could have been better, but the film is pretty competent overall.
Has some definite 80's horror elements. Those pesky carefree kids camping out in the middle of nowhere without a care in the world. A gratuitous skinny-dipping nude scene, plus some other nudity, and various gore and even a number of gut-munching scenes that are for the most part well done.
The movie is shot on digital equipment most likely, so far and above a lot of shot on video travesties of the past.
The other interesting thing is that it has no title or opening credits of any kind, they kind of want you to dive right into the movie and stay there until the end, which is briefer at 75min.
It doesn't explain why there is a zombie outbreak in the woods and town like so many others and even classic zombie entries.
The focus of the movie is more so the living surviving and you won't be able to guess that well who for sure is going to make it.
It is kind of a doom related movie where it ends and some more zombie fighting is probably needed, but those that are left at least have a good start and idea how to make it to somewhere even safer if they're going to......
Are there some flaws in this movie, yes, does it warrant the low 3.2 rating at the time of this writing, no, I really don't think so. Some of the dialogue, acting and audio, even special effects could have been better, but the film is pretty competent overall.
Has some definite 80's horror elements. Those pesky carefree kids camping out in the middle of nowhere without a care in the world. A gratuitous skinny-dipping nude scene, plus some other nudity, and various gore and even a number of gut-munching scenes that are for the most part well done.
The movie is shot on digital equipment most likely, so far and above a lot of shot on video travesties of the past.
The other interesting thing is that it has no title or opening credits of any kind, they kind of want you to dive right into the movie and stay there until the end, which is briefer at 75min.
It doesn't explain why there is a zombie outbreak in the woods and town like so many others and even classic zombie entries.
The focus of the movie is more so the living surviving and you won't be able to guess that well who for sure is going to make it.
It is kind of a doom related movie where it ends and some more zombie fighting is probably needed, but those that are left at least have a good start and idea how to make it to somewhere even safer if they're going to......
- radioactivesound
- 23 जुल॰ 2022
- परमालिंक