Já, Olga Hepnarová

The movie plunges us into a world of nihilism, where the darkness of the human psyche reigns supreme. It is a portrait of a young woman who is disillusioned with society and driven to commit a heinous crime. The movie explores the depths of human despair and the impact of social isolation on the individual psyche.

Director Tomas Weinreb and Petr Kazda don't shy away from the darkness that engulfs Olga's world. They craft a bleak and unrelenting atmosphere, one that is suffused with a sense of futility and despair. The cinematography is austere and bleak, reflecting the emotional landscape of the protagonist.

The movie presents a provocative challenge to the viewer's values and beliefs. It forces us to confront the darker aspects of the human condition and consider the ways in which society fails to address the needs of its most vulnerable members. It is a stark reminder that the human psyche is a fragile and complex thing, one that can be pushed to the brink of madness under the right conditions.

In movie, Weinreb and Kazda have created a chilling portrait of a young woman who is pushed to the edge by a society that refuses to accept her. It is a powerful reminder of the need for compassion, empathy, and understanding in a world that can be so cold and unforgiving.

To fully appreciate this film one probably should have a minimum knowledge about psychiatry and of schizophrenia in general.

The main character in this film, Olga Hepnarova, is IMO one of the best depictions of a schizophrenic person I've ever seen in a movie. In this regard, the movie makers did an extraordinary good job. The atmosphere of the film is dark, yet the individual scenes are often banal and the dialogues short and often flat and trivial. This however is not of disadvantage to the movie as one would expect. It actually helps to unfold to the viewer the deep, but chaotic and hate-focused thoughts that go inside the mind of Hepnarova. The scenes where she contemplates the traumatizing experiences of her life are deep and sad, showing that she is a very complex and deeply thinking person, but at the same time they succeed to NOT depict her as a martyr, which she clearly fails to be. She despises society and is fond to do it a favor (by killing herself) only in her best life-time when she's deeply in love (with her lesbian lover). Hepnarova is evil, but in the movie it looks more like real-world-evil with its full complexity and context, not the common flat movie-evil known from pop-culture. This also adds to the uniqueness of the movie and probably makes many viewers to sympathize with her. Not to mention the great acting by Michalina Olszanska.

I would appreciate more family scenes in the film. I think it would be beneficial for a better understanding of Hepnarova's mind. In particular the roots of her hatred towards her family. But in conclusion I have to take my hat off to the movie makers, they exactly knew what they wanted to deliver and they delivered it. A sad depiction of a sick mind driven to the edge (partially by the society and partially by herself) until the bitter end.

In Prague, Czechoslovakia in 1973, Olga Hepnarová drove her truck through a crowd of elderly people waiting on the sidewalk. Olga's actions were deliberate and planned….and she ended up killing 8 innocent people in the process. Now, over four decades later, filmmakers Petr Kazda and Tomás Weinreb have brought her story to the big screen—perhaps in light of several similar acts committed throughout the world by jihadists. But viewers of the film need to be a very specific and patient lot, as the movie clearly is not one intended for the average viewer.

The film begins the teenage Olga attempting suicide and as a result being incarcerated in a rather awful mental hospital. While the film didn't make this clear, she apparently was in and out of mental institutions during much of her life. The film then picks up with Olga as a young adult, working and having various sexual relationships. The publicity material for the film describes her as a lesbian and the film also takes that approach, though I read up on her and apparently she was bisexual. I am not sure why they chose to portray her as a lesbian but viewers will see quite a bit of Olga and several of her lovers. Regardless, this is not a film for the prudish.

It is odd that Olga is shown as being so sexual since she also had a very strong hatred for the human race and felt she was the world's 'whipping boy'. The film uses the German word 'prügelknabe'—which I had to look up on the internet and I am mentioning this in case you see the film and find yourself confused by the term. But regardless, Olga hated people and had a very strong persecution complex. And, as a result, she apparently felt completely justified to murder the people at the bus stop.

Now it's obvious that Olga was not in her right mind. She was flat emotionally and intensely angry deep within her. Most would consider her insane. However, she knew what she was doing and simply did not care and admitted this freely in court. So what was the court to do with her?

This is a very well crafted film. The filmmakers used black & white footage which I think was a good move since the story took place in the late 60s and early 70s. Michalina Olszanska also did a superb job portraying the title character as it would not be easy playing someone with so little emotion nor with much connection to others. But this brings up a problem…if the main character is this emotionally constricted and the film is told from her point of view, is it an easy film to watch? This is obviously no for most people. You have to have an interest in the subject matter and you have to be very patient, as the film is slow and almost completely bereft of energy. Olga is severely depressed…and it is draining, at times, watching her. I was able to stick with this because of my own background as a therapist, though I sure could have done without the vomiting scene early in the film. I have no idea why in recent years filmmakers have decided to show close-ups of folks throwing up…and I think this is perhaps taking realism a bit too far. Overall, for the right viewers, "I, Olga" is well worth seeing but for most it's just too much of a downer.

Tackling a very difficult subject in a rigid social environment like communist Czechoslovakia in the 70's, this film has done it great!

The female lead -the very young Polish actress Michalina Olszanska is doing the impossible while portraying an extremely complex character that no-one would otherwise understand or empathize.

The cinematic recreation of the atmosphere of Prague in the early 70's is so true, that this this black & white film looks like it was really shot in the Seventies. Only the stable digital image suggests else.

I do recommend this movie to all sensitive viewers who wish to look deeper in to the human and social issues.

Rating this movie is not an easy task for me. It has its strengths, but also aspects that I could not digest. First, the black-and-white picture is fine and takes you back to the 1970s. But a movie without opening credits and absolutely no music was somewhat shocking. Actually, most of the movie consists of short, mutually unconnected scenes, where people don't talk, and are just sitting or standing.

Although this "art style" captures the gloomy inner world of Olga, I can not ignore that it is disrespectful to the audience who may have problems to understand, what is actually happening on the screen. The original version reportedly lasted 2 1/2 hours and the editor's digital scissors reduced it on the border of comprehensibility. And I say this as a man who had studied the entire history of Hepnarova and I was able to successfully predict what will follow in the next few minutes. Undoubtedly, the movie will lose spectators due to these insensitive cuts. And that's a pity, because the second half - starting from the massacre through the trial up to the execution - is already filmed in the chilly spirit that I expected.

It is here, where Michalina Olszańska shows her superb performance, and with her, this whole spectacle stands and falls. The probe into Olga's depressing psyche is the true peak of the movie. The filmmakers also try to be authentic and virtually all presented scenes are based on real testimonies, Olga's letters and court documents. It is only in the lesbian scenes, where they apparently exaggerate. For example, Hepnarova was in love with her female colleague, but they have never had any intimate relationship. Even the openly lesbian contact at the disco party is odd in Czechoslovakia of the 1970s - to say the least. (Although it is again inspired by the fact, because Olga liked provoking and was sometimes wearing a jacket on a naked body.)

As a whole, this film biography of Olga Hepnarova is impressive and leaves feelings that will fly you off the handle for many hours. In fact, it is not unusual that during the final credits, spectators remain downright frozen to their seats. However, I am still sorry that the final result could have been even better. If I were in place of the directors, I would take the movie as Olga's retrospective narrative during interrogation. Her own words would cover the "dead spots" in the story and explain her inner feelings. Too late...