Corbin Nash

The movie was not good, the writing was poor. honestly this movie was not half as good as the worst lostboys movie, i think the worst one got a 4.6. like i said honest. its not the worst movie i've ever seen, but its like miles from being decent. feldman is poor, his trans-whatever vampire is just nonsense. what is wrong with him. how the producers ever got mcdowell and hauer to make cameos in this movie is beyond me. must have a slow decade.

Ohh my this was really bad. And not in a good way, but in the "I feel really sorry for these guys" cringe worthy kind of way.

I am not sure if it supposed to be a pilot for a possible tv show or what the deal was but as a standalone movie this does not work at all.

Maybe if they had a decent editor there might have been some sort of coherence to the story, but as it stands its a mess. Guess its supposed to be an origin story? The byline here at IMDB that describes the movie is the ending. Getting there is confusing and NOT AT ALL scary in the very least bit.

The main antagonist, Cory Feldman, as a cross dressing bloodthirsty john was probably supposed to be scary (?) but comes across as a sad sack of you know what. Its a spoof on Buffalo Bill from silence of the lambs, but where he came across as disturbed in a disconcerting manner, Feldman's Bill just feels sad. You simply cant help feeling sorry for him and his mediocre personage. Is this really the best they could do for a bad guy?

Ohhh yes there is another guy in the shadows somewhere but I guess they saved him for the series.

To summarize, its not scary. Its incoherent and its all been done and seen before, the main protagonist is as forgettable as they come and the main antagonist is sad and embarrassing.

I really wanted to like this.. But its just not worth seeing. The poster is OK though.

There is nothing good to say about this movie. This movie is about as good as Feldman's music. Take my word & don't waste your time or you'll never get it back.

Awful does not start to tell you the let down. Where in the universe do these reviewers giving 9 and 10 come from? One even wrote "best movie of the year". You got to be kidding me!

I admit, the ploy is always the same: early on upon movie release, all these people show up with lots and lots of standard / non sensical praises extolling the worse movies. Technically, this trick is as old as online reviews: it fortunately should not fool anybody. Well, except me this time... I saw the IMDB average 6.something rating, thought why not? and went for it.

Well, that was a mistake: this movie was like a bad dream with nothing to redeem it. A bad movie with all the ingredients: the misfits vampires, the violent weirdos, a meh! vague story, a bout of MMA, lots of blood, a tiny touch of gothic atmosphere and above all, Ladies and Gentlemen, real baaaad acting. If you have 1:35 hour to waste, here is the occasion.

Not even Corey and his band of merry 'Angels' creating multiple accounts to increase the overall score, can prevent this one sinking to the depths of Razzie award territory.

There is absolutely no originality in this movie what-so-ever, so i can't understand why the 10 star reviews are rating it as some kind of original 'cult classic' ?? *sarcasm*

Cinematography and art design is good, but it's totally wasted in a complete mish mash blade knockoff / buffalo bill wannabe story and script. Seriously, I kid you not, the final scene is an EXACT rip off from Blade.

It's hard to judge the acting, because the script is so cringe worthy! eg 'I'm gonna kill em all' - 'This is a city of sinners' *BLEURGH* The only decent stand out performance for me was the latino girl. At the other end of the spectrum was Feldman, it was as if the director said ' Ok Corey, I want you to offend every transvestite in America, show me what you got '

.... NEXT