अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंSet in the Pacific, 1942. A Japanese soldier and a British prisoner of war are stranded on a deserted island, hunted by a deadly creature. Two mortal enemies must come together to survive th... सभी पढ़ेंSet in the Pacific, 1942. A Japanese soldier and a British prisoner of war are stranded on a deserted island, hunted by a deadly creature. Two mortal enemies must come together to survive the unknown.Set in the Pacific, 1942. A Japanese soldier and a British prisoner of war are stranded on a deserted island, hunted by a deadly creature. Two mortal enemies must come together to survive the unknown.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Despite of never having heard about the 2024 movie "Orang Ikan" (aka "Monster Island"), of course I opted to watch it as I had the opportunity here in 2025. I am a big fan of all things horror after all.
The storyline certainly sounded interesting as served through the synopsis, however I have to say that the actual movie itself, well not so much. Sure, it was watchable, and there was potential, but ultimately it was a tedious and generic movie.
I was not familiar with a single actor on the cast list. The acting performances were not particularly outstanding or memorable, which was a shame, as the movie had a very small cast ensemble, and thus was depending on the acting performances to carry a certain weight of the movie.
The effects in the movie were okay, and I did like the creature design and the way that they made the aquatic creature look. It definitely helped keep the movie afloat, pardon the pun.
Ultimately then "Orang Ikan" is not a movie that I would recommend you to waste 84 minutes on watching.
My rating of writer and director Mike Wiluan's 2024 movie "Orang Ikan" lands on a generous four out of ten stars.
The storyline certainly sounded interesting as served through the synopsis, however I have to say that the actual movie itself, well not so much. Sure, it was watchable, and there was potential, but ultimately it was a tedious and generic movie.
I was not familiar with a single actor on the cast list. The acting performances were not particularly outstanding or memorable, which was a shame, as the movie had a very small cast ensemble, and thus was depending on the acting performances to carry a certain weight of the movie.
The effects in the movie were okay, and I did like the creature design and the way that they made the aquatic creature look. It definitely helped keep the movie afloat, pardon the pun.
Ultimately then "Orang Ikan" is not a movie that I would recommend you to waste 84 minutes on watching.
My rating of writer and director Mike Wiluan's 2024 movie "Orang Ikan" lands on a generous four out of ten stars.
I recently watched the Japanese film 🇯🇵 Monster Island (2024) on Shudder. The storyline follows a group of war criminals whose boat explodes, leaving them stranded on a remote island in the Pacific Ocean. But they're not alone-something deadly hunts them, picking them off one by one. Where is this creature from, and can anyone survive it?
The film is written and directed by Mike Wiluan (Buffalo Boys) and stars Dean Fujioka (Fullmetal Alchemist), Callum Woodhouse (B&B), and Alan Maxson (V/H/S: Beyond).
There was a lot I enjoyed about this film. The practical effects were fantastic, and I especially loved the creature design-it had a strong Creature from the Black Lagoon vibe. The gore and kill scenes were impressive, but the CGI was hit or miss. Explosions, fire, and blood effects didn't quite land and pulled me out of the moment a bit. The story itself was very straightforward and lacked imagination, and by the final act, it started to lose steam.
In conclusion, Monster Island is a solid monster movie that mixes old-school creature feature charm with modern special effects. I'd give it a 6.5/10.
The film is written and directed by Mike Wiluan (Buffalo Boys) and stars Dean Fujioka (Fullmetal Alchemist), Callum Woodhouse (B&B), and Alan Maxson (V/H/S: Beyond).
There was a lot I enjoyed about this film. The practical effects were fantastic, and I especially loved the creature design-it had a strong Creature from the Black Lagoon vibe. The gore and kill scenes were impressive, but the CGI was hit or miss. Explosions, fire, and blood effects didn't quite land and pulled me out of the moment a bit. The story itself was very straightforward and lacked imagination, and by the final act, it started to lose steam.
In conclusion, Monster Island is a solid monster movie that mixes old-school creature feature charm with modern special effects. I'd give it a 6.5/10.
Great action, great suspense, great script, great practical FX, great creature design (although of course, based on the original), great story, great acting, great pacing, great location, great cinematography, great editing, great gore.
This movie is so goddamn fun! From the opening frames, to the somewhat heartfelt final moments, it's such an enjoyable ride. The film makers here set out to do one thing - make a fun movie - and that's EXACTLY what they accomplished. A nearly perfect escapism film that will have you enthralled the entire run time.
Absolutely recommended! Won't disappoint.
This movie is so goddamn fun! From the opening frames, to the somewhat heartfelt final moments, it's such an enjoyable ride. The film makers here set out to do one thing - make a fun movie - and that's EXACTLY what they accomplished. A nearly perfect escapism film that will have you enthralled the entire run time.
Absolutely recommended! Won't disappoint.
From its promising opening sequence, this film teases the audience with the promise of a taut, character driven drama. Yet after the first twenty minutes, what should be an absorbing narrative begins to unravel under the weight of its own indecision.
1. Pacing That Misfires The first act moves with purpose introducing a compelling premise and intriguing protagonists. But once the story gears shift into its second act, the momentum grinds to a crawl. Instead of escalating tension or deepening character dynamics, the plot stalls in a series of extended, almost meditative sequences. Moments that could have been lean and impactful are stretched far beyond their narrative value, leaving viewers checking their watches rather than leaning forward in their seats.
2. Directorial Overreach in Framing Director's penchant for dramatic zooms and prolonged establishing shots feels less like a stylistic signature and more like cinematic self indulgence. Scenes that demand emotional intimacy or brisk plot advancement are instead punctuated by repetitive close ups of empty rooms, lingering aerial sweeps of nondescript landscapes, and promise unfulfilled "slow reveals" that rarely reveal anything of substance. Rather than heighten suspense, these choices dilute it, making the film resemble a nature documentary more than a tightly woven drama.
3. Lost in Translation of Story to Screen There's a palpable sense that the filmmakers lost sight of the core narrative somewhere deep into the middle. Key plot beats come and go without the weight they deserve; characters drift through scenes without meaningful interaction, leaving motivations hazy and emotional stakes low. When a story's pacing and visual language fail to serve its themes, the result is a disconnect that's hard to shake.
4. Conclusion: A Case for Tighter Editing While there are flashes of visual beauty and occasional snippets of solid acting, the overall experience is hampered by a sluggish rhythm and an overreliance on stylistic flourishes. With judicious editing trimming extraneous zooms, sharpening scene transitions, and refocusing on the narrative spine this film could have held much greater impact. As it stands, it offers a lesson in how even the most intriguing premise can falter when the director loses sight of pacing and purpose.
1. Pacing That Misfires The first act moves with purpose introducing a compelling premise and intriguing protagonists. But once the story gears shift into its second act, the momentum grinds to a crawl. Instead of escalating tension or deepening character dynamics, the plot stalls in a series of extended, almost meditative sequences. Moments that could have been lean and impactful are stretched far beyond their narrative value, leaving viewers checking their watches rather than leaning forward in their seats.
2. Directorial Overreach in Framing Director's penchant for dramatic zooms and prolonged establishing shots feels less like a stylistic signature and more like cinematic self indulgence. Scenes that demand emotional intimacy or brisk plot advancement are instead punctuated by repetitive close ups of empty rooms, lingering aerial sweeps of nondescript landscapes, and promise unfulfilled "slow reveals" that rarely reveal anything of substance. Rather than heighten suspense, these choices dilute it, making the film resemble a nature documentary more than a tightly woven drama.
3. Lost in Translation of Story to Screen There's a palpable sense that the filmmakers lost sight of the core narrative somewhere deep into the middle. Key plot beats come and go without the weight they deserve; characters drift through scenes without meaningful interaction, leaving motivations hazy and emotional stakes low. When a story's pacing and visual language fail to serve its themes, the result is a disconnect that's hard to shake.
4. Conclusion: A Case for Tighter Editing While there are flashes of visual beauty and occasional snippets of solid acting, the overall experience is hampered by a sluggish rhythm and an overreliance on stylistic flourishes. With judicious editing trimming extraneous zooms, sharpening scene transitions, and refocusing on the narrative spine this film could have held much greater impact. As it stands, it offers a lesson in how even the most intriguing premise can falter when the director loses sight of pacing and purpose.
Monster Island is a World War II-era creature feature that swings for the fences with a bold genre mashup: part survival thriller, part war drama, part folklore-fueled monster flick. Directed by Mike Wiluan (Buffalo Boys), and inspired by Malay mythology and classic films like Creature from the Black Lagoon, the movie feels like a love letter to mid-century horror wrapped in the rugged grit of a wartime survival tale.
The setup is promising. A Japanese soldier and a British POW are marooned on a remote island during WWII, forced to put aside their hatred and histories to survive. But it's not just each other, or the encroaching Japanese military they have to worry about. Something hungry stalks the jungle, able to camouflage itself like a chameleon, striking from the shadows with lethal precision. Think The Defiant Ones meets Predator, with a splash of Southeast Asian folklore.
It's a clever concept, and the film wears its influences proudly. The callbacks to The Defiant Ones aren't subtle, nor are the nods to classic monster movie tropes: the slow reveal of the creature in the dense jungle. When the film leans into its atmosphere, it works. There are stretches where you feel the tension between the two men just as much as the threat lurking in the trees.
Unfortunately, the execution doesn't always live up to the potential. The CGI creature design is interesting-drawing on mythical elements instead of going full Hollywood-but the visual effects themselves are... well, rough. The monster too often looks like it belongs in a Syfy original from the early 2000s, standing out awkwardly from the environment rather than blending in. That disconnect pulled me out of the experience, and while I try not to judge a film solely on its visual effects, they do matter in a creature feature... especially one built on stealth, camouflage, and primal terror.
Storywise, it's serviceable. The relationship between the two leads carries enough emotional weight to keep the film moving, and the pacing never drags. There are a few solid gore moments, but nothing that will shock seasoned horror fans. The ending, while not bad, lands right where you expect it to a little too safe for a film that tries to position itself as something unique.
For fans of offbeat monster movies or those with a soft spot for war-horror hybrids, Monster Island is a solid watch. It might not break new ground, but there's enough here-folklore inspiration, tension between enemies, turned-allies, and a cool creature concept to justify its runtime. For me personally, the movie didn't quite hit the right notes. I love a good creature feature, but I'm easily turned off by poor CGI and uneven tone. Still, there are many flavors of horror, and this one might just be the right bite for someone else.
The setup is promising. A Japanese soldier and a British POW are marooned on a remote island during WWII, forced to put aside their hatred and histories to survive. But it's not just each other, or the encroaching Japanese military they have to worry about. Something hungry stalks the jungle, able to camouflage itself like a chameleon, striking from the shadows with lethal precision. Think The Defiant Ones meets Predator, with a splash of Southeast Asian folklore.
It's a clever concept, and the film wears its influences proudly. The callbacks to The Defiant Ones aren't subtle, nor are the nods to classic monster movie tropes: the slow reveal of the creature in the dense jungle. When the film leans into its atmosphere, it works. There are stretches where you feel the tension between the two men just as much as the threat lurking in the trees.
Unfortunately, the execution doesn't always live up to the potential. The CGI creature design is interesting-drawing on mythical elements instead of going full Hollywood-but the visual effects themselves are... well, rough. The monster too often looks like it belongs in a Syfy original from the early 2000s, standing out awkwardly from the environment rather than blending in. That disconnect pulled me out of the experience, and while I try not to judge a film solely on its visual effects, they do matter in a creature feature... especially one built on stealth, camouflage, and primal terror.
Storywise, it's serviceable. The relationship between the two leads carries enough emotional weight to keep the film moving, and the pacing never drags. There are a few solid gore moments, but nothing that will shock seasoned horror fans. The ending, while not bad, lands right where you expect it to a little too safe for a film that tries to position itself as something unique.
For fans of offbeat monster movies or those with a soft spot for war-horror hybrids, Monster Island is a solid watch. It might not break new ground, but there's enough here-folklore inspiration, tension between enemies, turned-allies, and a cool creature concept to justify its runtime. For me personally, the movie didn't quite hit the right notes. I love a good creature feature, but I'm easily turned off by poor CGI and uneven tone. Still, there are many flavors of horror, and this one might just be the right bite for someone else.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Monster Island
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 23 मि(83 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39:1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें