जय गणेश

It is a classic example of being misled by a movie title. With a name like this, you would expect a mythological or devotional movie, whereas it is an investigative thriller.

This movie is about a brilliant but handicapped cartoonist and ethical hacker who works as a designer in a media firm. He helps the police find a kidnapper using his talents.

The title of the movie comes from the superhero cartoon series he develops, named Jai Ganesh. The story may not be unique, but it keeps you engaged throughout its entire runtime. The thriller elements are well-packaged, keeping your eyes glued to the screen to find out what the next revelation will be. The way he connects the dots to find the kidnapper or the kid is well-written.

It is an Unni Mukundan show, and he performs really well, demonstrating that given good characters, he can pull off any role. The other actors lend support to the main character and have done a decent job.

The music is a big letdown, with not a single number working in its favor. Even the background score is underwhelming. The police are depicted as mere puppets, knowing nothing about solving the case and relying entirely on this outsider, which is far-fetched. But it doesn't really hamper your viewing as you can take that with a pinch of salt.

If the movie had a title more true to its story and genre, it could have worked wonders. I really enjoyed it as it is a good thriller and can be watched with your entire family. #pranureviews #JaiGanesh #JaiGaneshReview.

**Jai Ganesh** is a film that had a promising premise, but unfortunately, the execution fell short in several areas. One of the most notable shortcomings in this movie is the acting by Unni Mukundan, who plays a pivotal role.

### **Performance Analysis:**

**1. Lack of Emotional Depth:** Unni Mukundan's portrayal of the lead character lacked the necessary emotional depth. Throughout the film, crucial scenes that demanded a strong, emotive performance felt flat and uninspiring. This was particularly evident in scenes where his character faced personal turmoil and this inability to convey genuine emotion detracted from the overall impact of the film.

**2. Inconsistent Delivery:** Consistency is key to a compelling performance, and unfortunately, Unni's acting was rather uneven. At times, his delivery came off as overly theatrical, bordering on melodramatic, while in other instances, it was overly subdued. This inconsistency made it difficult for viewers to connect with his character or fully invest in the storyline.

**3. Limited Range:** The role demanded a versatile actor capable of showcasing a range of emotions, from joy and love to anger and despair. However, Unni's limited range was evident as he struggled to transition between different emotional states convincingly. This limitation was especially glaring in scenes that required quick emotional shifts, where his performance felt forced and unnatural.

**4. Dialogue Delivery:** A critical aspect of any actor's performance is the delivery of dialogue, and this is another area where Unni Mukundan faltered. His dialogue delivery often came across as wooden and lacked the necessary conviction. Key lines that were meant to be impactful fell flat due to his inability to breathe life into the words.

**5. Physical Expressions:** Acting is as much about physical expressions as it is about verbal delivery. Unni's facial expressions and body language often did not align with the emotions his character was supposed to be experiencing. Whether it was a look of concern, joy, or anger, his expressions felt disconnected from the narrative, making it hard for audiences to empathize with his character.

While "Jai Ganesh" had potential, Unni Mukundan's performance was a significant weak link. His portrayal lacked the depth, consistency, and authenticity needed to bring the character to life. As a result, what could have been a powerful and engaging story felt rather hollow and underwhelming. Moving forward, it would benefit Unni to focus on honing his craft, perhaps by taking on roles that push him to explore a wider emotional range and to connect more deeply with his characters.

I would rate it 10/10 for its gripping storyline, acting and overall message it intends to convey. The film deserves a lot more appreciation than it has received.

While many may feel its a Hindu propaganda film due the title, it serves a strong message to all sections of the community. The film spreads awareness about the challenges faced by the disabled community , their resilience and importance to the overall society.

Unni mukundan was outstanding in his portrayal of the lead and was well supported by fellow star cast. The background score and screenplay was equally engrossing serving total entertainment for the entire length of the movie.

This is what all movies should aspire to be, and yes, I can say that for many other great movies but I believe this is one of, if not the best example of art in movie form as it presents a good story, great action and phenomenal acting from actor unnimukuntan.

A well written and executed movie. Great performance by Unni and the whole team. It was very engaging and our whole family loved it! A must watch in theatres.

There are some groups degrading this movie because unnimukuntan against terrorist,he is believed in hanuman and he is a true nationalist.

This is another gem from malayalam film industry.

The film Jai Ganesh, is a cinematic work belonging to the thriller drama genres and was directed by Ranjith Shankar.

The narrative is focused on Ganesh, a young disabled man. The subject is wheelchair-bound due to paralysis of both lower limbs. He is combatting his disabilities. He is employed in a online news channel as a designer. It is evident that he possesses a high level of expertise in the domain of cyber hacking. He provided assistance to a renowned legal advocate in a case pertaining to the manufacture and distribution of counterfeit pharmaceuticals. This assistance involved the procurement of crucial evidence, a task which was executed without the need to disclose his identity. He is also an enthusiast of cartoons, a pastime which he has cultivated over time. He developed a superhero cartoon series under the title of 'Jai Ganesh'. A publishing company has expressed interest in the cartoon series, and has indicated its intention to publish it. The cartoon series is distributed via an application that boasts a plethora of features. It has been observed that the phenomenon is gradually gaining traction among the younger population. In pursuit of a novel narrative, he encountered information pertaining to a series of robberies. Consequently, he submitted this intelligence to the police. The individual responsible was apprehended by law enforcement authorities. Subsequently, it became apparent to Ganesh that the police had erroneously apprehended an innocent individual, and that the actual perpetrator was still at large. The individual in question has exhibited signs of psychological distress in relation to this matter. The subject has only one friend, a nine-year-old child named Ayan. He is the son of the Member of the Legislative Assembly, Prashant Puthran. On the night of his birthday party, Ayan was abducted by an unknown individual. It is noteworthy that Ganesh is the sole witness to the abduction. The establishment of a special team by the police force signalled the commencement of an investigation. It was only with the assistance of the Ganesh police that the perpetrator was almost identified. The individual in question has been identified as Mohan Selvaraj. He has challenged both the police and the Member of the Legislative Assembly in a public forum. It is evident that the deceased's daughter succumbed to the effects of contaminated air, a factor that has been identified as a contributing cause of death. The residence of the family under discussion is situated in close proximity to the Skandapuram plastic manufacturing facility. It has been alleged that corruption took place within the plant, with the MLA being implicated in the incident. It is evident that Mohan Selvaraj is seeking retribution against the MLA by orchestrating the kidnapping of his son. Mohan committed suicide before reaching the police. Further information pertaining to the child is pending. Subsequently, Ganesh initiated an investigation with the help of police cyber team into the web activities and IP address of the perpetrator. He has identified several locations. However, it is evident that positive results cannot be achieved in the absence of a foundation. Evidence suggests that the connections of certain tea shops, sound box shops, food delivery services and IT parks are evident in the IP address. Mohan has already scheduled a Zoom live session to take place in the room where the child is being held. Ganesh initiated an investigation, adopting an individual approach. It was determined that the information contained within the IP address was not from Kakkanad, but rather from Kaloor. Following a considerable amount of effort, the child was located in a soundproof room of a company located in the Info Park in Kaloor.

The narrative was adequate. The text is riddled with inconsistencies and lacks coherence in certain sections. The direction provided was satisfactory. Furthermore, the performances delivered by the cast were of a sub standard. The cinematography and musical scores are of a high standard. The work is not considered to be of a particularly high standard, but it is regarded as being of some interest and is therefore worthy of a one time watching.