ब्रुकलिन की एक युवा सेक्स वर्कर अनोरा एक कुलीन वर्ग के बेटे से मिलती है और अचानक उससे शादी कर लेती है. जब यह खबर रूस तक पहुँचती है, तो उसकी परीकथा खतरे में पड़ जाती है क्योंकि उसके माता-पिता... सभी पढ़ेंब्रुकलिन की एक युवा सेक्स वर्कर अनोरा एक कुलीन वर्ग के बेटे से मिलती है और अचानक उससे शादी कर लेती है. जब यह खबर रूस तक पहुँचती है, तो उसकी परीकथा खतरे में पड़ जाती है क्योंकि उसके माता-पिता शादी को रद्द करवाने के लिए न्यूयॉर्क की ओर निकल पड़ते हैं.ब्रुकलिन की एक युवा सेक्स वर्कर अनोरा एक कुलीन वर्ग के बेटे से मिलती है और अचानक उससे शादी कर लेती है. जब यह खबर रूस तक पहुँचती है, तो उसकी परीकथा खतरे में पड़ जाती है क्योंकि उसके माता-पिता शादी को रद्द करवाने के लिए न्यूयॉर्क की ओर निकल पड़ते हैं.
- 5 ऑस्कर जीते
- 152 जीत और कुल 269 नामांकन
Luna Sofía Miranda
- Lulu
- (as Luna Sofia Miranda)
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Anora' delves into class disparity and human relationships with a dark comedic approach, though pacing and predictability are common criticisms. Mikey Madison's portrayal of Anora is widely praised for authenticity and vulnerability. The film's examination of sex work garners attention, though some feel it lacks depth. 'Anora' is a mixed bag, offering strong performances and resonant themes, but hindered by pacing and character development issues.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I don't understand at all how this got 5 Oscar's this year. I'm watching for the first time as it has now hit streaming and I was left very confused. It was slow in the first half, picked up a little in the second and then the last half went back to being slow. A lot of scenes were super drawn out, there was no need for the film to be as long as it was. We got absolutely no back story on Anora at all which is what I was waiting for. Don't get me wrong, Mikey Madison isn't a bad actress but I was waiting for more. For the most part she just cursed, showed her body and screamed a lot. I didn't really see a performance worth best actress, even though her performance wasn't terrible. The script also wasn't that good, there were a lot of pieces that were overly repetitive and the characters were pretty much one dimensional. I guess the audience is left to use our imagination but I wish we were given more for the runtime.
The first 40 minutes can be quite misleading, likely catching viewers off guard if they enter with the expectation of a romantic narrative.
Once the first act concludes and the second act kicks in, there's a striking shift in both tone and style that I honestly did not see coming.
The comedy is genuinely entertaining, with moments that will have you laughing out loud. Despite serious circumstances, the absurdity of the situations elicits laughter and chuckles.
They have certainly nailed the dark comedy sides of the story.
However, I found the dramatic elements to be less impactful than I had anticipated, leaving me puzzled by the overwhelmingly positive feedback it has garnered from all around.
While Mikey Madison delivered an impressive performance, and fully deserves every praise coming along her way, her character needed more depth to properly flourish. It feels as if the writing intentionally held back on details, leaving the job of contemplation solely to the audience.
I wish that weren't the case.
Once the first act concludes and the second act kicks in, there's a striking shift in both tone and style that I honestly did not see coming.
The comedy is genuinely entertaining, with moments that will have you laughing out loud. Despite serious circumstances, the absurdity of the situations elicits laughter and chuckles.
They have certainly nailed the dark comedy sides of the story.
However, I found the dramatic elements to be less impactful than I had anticipated, leaving me puzzled by the overwhelmingly positive feedback it has garnered from all around.
While Mikey Madison delivered an impressive performance, and fully deserves every praise coming along her way, her character needed more depth to properly flourish. It feels as if the writing intentionally held back on details, leaving the job of contemplation solely to the audience.
I wish that weren't the case.
My expectations were high, solely based on the fact that it somehow, probably by error, won the majestic Palme d'Or. Every film that previously won the Palme d'Or has at worst been mediocre, but never a chronically awful waste of time movie. Mostly Palme d'Or winners are absolute classics. Who to blame? The 2024 Jury? Yes probably. Definitely. The acting kept sinking to new lows in every scene. Not one of the actors delivered a credible performance. The stereotyping was unfounded unresearched BS. I am not even disappointed for having wasted 2 hours of my life on this garbage, I'm just flabbergasted how this could have made the shortlist to Cannes film festival, or any other festival for that matter. I will keep a mental note of all cast and writers, director etc associated with this garbage production to make sure I don't waste my time having to sit through such appalling productions again.
I wanted to see this film for a long time due to high rating on Metacritic, also won Palm D'or, so was very excited to watch it and finally when it won the Oscar, I bought the film on Amazon prime and watched it
To say the least, I was a utterly disappointed. Yes movie had some sequences which were good, but nowhere is the movie Oscar worthy. It should not even be nominated in the best films category. I don't know what has happened to Hollywood that the level of movies that win Oscars has degraded so much over the years. Winning the Oscar for best film was a life goal and this movie winning it really undermines the value of an Oscar.
The script, the narrative is okay, nothing new, some surprises here and there, and that's about it.
The performances I would say are good. The lead actress has done a great job. Maybe she deserved an Oscar nomination, but not win the other side characters, except for one or two are interesting. Rest are not making any sense or any depth of your thinking about them a lot.
Cinematography is good. There is a lot of frames are well placed and lot of imagery. I would say photography is good, but again when the narrative is not strong enough to hold everything falls apart.
I've not seen the other movies which have been nominated. Maybe they are even worse than this, but of course, this does not live up to expectations and Hollywood needs to up their game. Otherwise, I need to stop watching any new movies.
The script, the narrative is okay, nothing new, some surprises here and there, and that's about it.
The performances I would say are good. The lead actress has done a great job. Maybe she deserved an Oscar nomination, but not win the other side characters, except for one or two are interesting. Rest are not making any sense or any depth of your thinking about them a lot.
Cinematography is good. There is a lot of frames are well placed and lot of imagery. I would say photography is good, but again when the narrative is not strong enough to hold everything falls apart.
I've not seen the other movies which have been nominated. Maybe they are even worse than this, but of course, this does not live up to expectations and Hollywood needs to up their game. Otherwise, I need to stop watching any new movies.
It flies by with a certain brilliance and salty humor during the first 3 quarters of an hour of the film, after that, you get bored stiff for almost an hour due to the lack of a captivating scenario, then we end up with a rather unpleasant melodrama.
Too much length, really: the director seems to have been sooooo satisfied with his actors that he didn't cut several interminable and very boring periods of tracking between the different protagonists. This is really the film's biggest weak point: the director gets drunk on his own virtuosity and ends up telling nothing exciting. Too bad.
Yet it is this film that won the Palme d'Or at Cannes this year...
Too much length, really: the director seems to have been sooooo satisfied with his actors that he didn't cut several interminable and very boring periods of tracking between the different protagonists. This is really the film's biggest weak point: the director gets drunk on his own virtuosity and ends up telling nothing exciting. Too bad.
Yet it is this film that won the Palme d'Or at Cannes this year...
Catching Up With 'Anora' Star Mikey Madison
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe word Vanya uses to insult Igor and Garnick and Anora later picks up on, gopnik, is a word in former Soviet republics for a member of urban criminal subculture, or a young hoodlum.
- गूफ़When Ani and Ivan wake up after a crazy night of partying, they remark that they slept all day and that the current time is 5pm. However, the sky outside is still bright, even though it's December, and it gets dark in NY before 5pm that time of year,
- कनेक्शनFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Best Movies of 2024 (2024)
- साउंडट्रैकGreatest Day - Robin Schulz Rework
Performed by Take That, Robin Schulz, and Calum Scott
Written by Gary Barlow, Howard Donald, Jason Orange, and Mark Owen
Courtesy of Polydor Ltd. (UK) under license from Universal Music Enterprises
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Анора
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Mill Basin, ब्रुकलीन, न्यूयॉर्क शहर, न्यूयॉर्क, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(Vanya's mansion scenes.)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $60,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $2,04,74,295
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $5,50,503
- 20 अक्टू॰ 2024
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $5,72,11,062
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 19 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें