John

I have to confess that I had been tempted to switch off at a couple of points early in the film. I really don't like opera or classical music accompanying a movie. It always strikes me as pretentious. And, as I'm going deaf, I had the subtitles on which irritated me when they flashed up saying "Operatic music playing" when it was actually Vivaldi's Four Seasons. Minor quibbles though as the action drew me in.

I was particularly struck by the camaraderie amongst the rent boys. And the supporting cast was convincing enough to make me wonder if they actually were streetwalkers. Peaches, despite her sharp edges was also a sympathetic character.

John was a bundle of contradictions, in turn kindly (to the congressman) and a thieving scumbag (with the poorer guy in the car). But no eighteen year old should have to carry his burdens, especially the final one.

This, despite some lighter moments, was a depressing film. Totally worth watching though.

There's not much here. The story centers around the male hustling trade in LaLa land. What might have been an excellent docudrama exploring the under represented lives of young men on the street completely misses the mark. First of all, the venue is all wrong. The producers and writers might have chosen a smaller town to focus their attention. Nobody cares about LA, it's way too stereotypical. Secondly, the writing is terrible. Then there's the acting which sinks this cinematic ship even further. John, around whom the picture revolves, has no personality whatsoever. We really don't learn too much about what motivated him to end up on the streets in the first place. He doesn't come across at all as a sympathetic character., the others even less so. This viewer wishes that the script had more socially relevant dialogue about the ups and downs of the life of a male sex worker. I also feel strongly that LA was the wrong selection for this yawn filled nonsense. Don't waste your time.

One of the film's minor shortcomings may be its pacing, as it occasionally feels slow in its exploration of character development. However, this deliberate pacing serves to emphasize the daily struggles and challenges faced by the LGBTQ sex workers, making the viewer feel more deeply connected to their stories.

In conclusion, "John" (2023) is a groundbreaking action movie that transcends the genre's boundaries. It successfully combines the thrill of action with a profound exploration of the LGBTQ sex workers' lives in Hollywood. Inspired by European cinematic movements, this film offers a thought-provoking and emotionally charged experience that is both powerful and poignant.

"John" (2023) is a groundbreaking action film that takes a unique and socially relevant approach to the genre. Instead of focusing on traditional action heroes, the film delves into the gritty lives of LGBTQ sex workers in the heart of Hollywood, LA. This daring choice, inspired by Italian neorealism and the French New Wave, provides a fresh and thought-provoking perspective on the action genre.

The film's strong suit lies in its character development, as it introduces us to a diverse cast of characters, each struggling to survive in a harsh and unforgiving world. John, the protagonist, brings an authentic and raw portrayal of someone fighting for acceptance and dignity. The action sequences, while intense and well-executed, are used as a backdrop to highlight the characters' resilience and the harsh reality they face daily.

Director's masterful use of the camera captures the essence of the streets of Hollywood, immersing the audience in the characters' world. The film's gritty visual style and hauntingly evocative soundtrack contribute to the movie's overall impact.

"John" is not just an action movie; it's a powerful social commentary that sheds light on the struggles of marginalized communities. While it might not cater to traditional action movie enthusiasts, it's an essential watch for those seeking thought-provoking cinema that challenges conventions and leaves a lasting impression.

John is a movie about a teenage prostitute living in L. A.

I understand the makers of the film wanted to show the gritty side of male prostitution and that some of the clients are emotionally fragile men.

However, the film makers were more focus on making it stylish and ignored the story.

The issues of the movie are: Unlikable main character (I have seen movies were the main character was a jerk but at least make him or her an interesting jerk) John, is flat one note character.

The acting is bad.

John begging his friend for food but can afford to live in an apartment!

Transgender phobia: I found it concerning the transgender friend talks about the reason why she transition is because her uncle molested her!

That is incorrect! People who are transgender have gender dysphoria that is not caused by physical abuse.

Too many scenes of John eating.

As I watch I thought about another movie that has similar theme, Sand Dollars(2014). It was a better produced, written and acted movie that didn't miss the mark.

I highly recommend Sand Dollars.