IMDb रेटिंग
6.5/10
6.9 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
हार्लेम का एक स्मार्ट, सत्रह वर्षीय फिल्म स्टूडेंट पर जब एक हत्या का आरोप लगता है तब उसकी दुनिया पलट जाती है. अब आगे की उसकी यात्रा को एक जटिल कानूनी लड़ाई के माध्यम से दर्शाया गया है.हार्लेम का एक स्मार्ट, सत्रह वर्षीय फिल्म स्टूडेंट पर जब एक हत्या का आरोप लगता है तब उसकी दुनिया पलट जाती है. अब आगे की उसकी यात्रा को एक जटिल कानूनी लड़ाई के माध्यम से दर्शाया गया है.हार्लेम का एक स्मार्ट, सत्रह वर्षीय फिल्म स्टूडेंट पर जब एक हत्या का आरोप लगता है तब उसकी दुनिया पलट जाती है. अब आगे की उसकी यात्रा को एक जटिल कानूनी लड़ाई के माध्यम से दर्शाया गया है.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
A$AP Rocky
- James King
- (as Rakim Mayers)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Production: Good script. Okay editing. Some of the scenes were a little jarring to the narrative. Good casting. Sets look realistic. 6/10.
On screen: Good to decent acting. Most of the actors are believable, but sometimes their actions seemed unnatural. Good cinematography. The artsy esthetic works for this film. 7/10.
Content/Impact: The telling of this story is necessary to combat the racism that black people, especially young black men, face today. The humanity that is shown throughout the film of black youth and how racism can write their own narrative is profound. Not only did it illustrate this through the main character Steve Harmon but the fact that it was shown through one of the "antagonists" William King shows us the complexity of black people meaning that black people are people too just like everyone else breaking the stereotype that black people are a monolith. 10/10.
Overall: Solid book to film adaptation needed in the world we live in today. 7.6/10.
On screen: Good to decent acting. Most of the actors are believable, but sometimes their actions seemed unnatural. Good cinematography. The artsy esthetic works for this film. 7/10.
Content/Impact: The telling of this story is necessary to combat the racism that black people, especially young black men, face today. The humanity that is shown throughout the film of black youth and how racism can write their own narrative is profound. Not only did it illustrate this through the main character Steve Harmon but the fact that it was shown through one of the "antagonists" William King shows us the complexity of black people meaning that black people are people too just like everyone else breaking the stereotype that black people are a monolith. 10/10.
Overall: Solid book to film adaptation needed in the world we live in today. 7.6/10.
3 out of 5 stars.
Strong plot about a guy who gets accused of robbing and murdering a store clerk. Great performances. But dull and tedious direction that gets boring after a while.
Strong plot about a guy who gets accused of robbing and murdering a store clerk. Great performances. But dull and tedious direction that gets boring after a while.
If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog :)
I've written this a thousand times, but I'll repeat it once again: I absolutely love one-location movies. I don't know exactly if most of Monster is actually developed inside the courtroom, but it genuinely feels like it. In fact, I believe every scene outside this place is told through extended flashbacks with narration from Steve Harmon about what happened before and on the day of the crime. Since the protagonist is a film student, his voice-over contains descriptions often seen in screenplays, which it's pleasant at first, but then gets overdone.
The trial is definitely the most captivating part of the story. Anthony Mandler and his team of writers demonstrate perfectly some real-life aspects of how the law works. From the well-known emotional disconnect of (some) lawyers with their clients to the prejudiced treatment of people of color, the courtroom sequences keep the movie interesting until its somewhat predictable, unsurprising conclusion. However, despite the exceptional performances from everyone involved, especially Kelvin Harrison Jr., the case itself wraps up with unanswered questions and some messages lost in the transmission.
While the viewers spend the entire runtime following Steve being a good son, brother, and friend, the other Black characters being accused don't receive the same treatment. At one point in the film, someone says "you must consider him innocent until evidence proves him guilty", but this only applies to the protagonist since everyone else is presumed to be guilty from the get-go without the audience ever seeing or hearing their point of view or knowing why they committed that crime. Furthermore, even though the viewers get to know the verdict, Steve's true impact on the murder remains questionable due to the last couple of flashbacks, which begs the question: "are we really supposed to root for him?"
Rating: C.
I've written this a thousand times, but I'll repeat it once again: I absolutely love one-location movies. I don't know exactly if most of Monster is actually developed inside the courtroom, but it genuinely feels like it. In fact, I believe every scene outside this place is told through extended flashbacks with narration from Steve Harmon about what happened before and on the day of the crime. Since the protagonist is a film student, his voice-over contains descriptions often seen in screenplays, which it's pleasant at first, but then gets overdone.
The trial is definitely the most captivating part of the story. Anthony Mandler and his team of writers demonstrate perfectly some real-life aspects of how the law works. From the well-known emotional disconnect of (some) lawyers with their clients to the prejudiced treatment of people of color, the courtroom sequences keep the movie interesting until its somewhat predictable, unsurprising conclusion. However, despite the exceptional performances from everyone involved, especially Kelvin Harrison Jr., the case itself wraps up with unanswered questions and some messages lost in the transmission.
While the viewers spend the entire runtime following Steve being a good son, brother, and friend, the other Black characters being accused don't receive the same treatment. At one point in the film, someone says "you must consider him innocent until evidence proves him guilty", but this only applies to the protagonist since everyone else is presumed to be guilty from the get-go without the audience ever seeing or hearing their point of view or knowing why they committed that crime. Furthermore, even though the viewers get to know the verdict, Steve's true impact on the murder remains questionable due to the last couple of flashbacks, which begs the question: "are we really supposed to root for him?"
Rating: C.
The film is okay, but the lead is superior to it. The cast in general is superb, but the writing is not. Others here have made excellent observations, so I won't spend time on that other than the annoyance of many questions never resolved. I felt this is a case for reasonable doubt all along, yet never addressed in the narrative. It's not a bad film, just not great. I do want to celebrate the lead actor, Kelvin Harrison: a striking and brilliantly talented young actor whose career I will be following closely.
It seems quite obvious where the movie leads at first. It does take a few turns and twists along the way. The main thing is how certain people are viewed though - based on the color of their skin as one example that is being explored here. You may feel that this is being a bit one dimensional, but as I already stated there is more to it than at first sight (no pun intended) and also unfortunately as cliche as it may sound, it is bitter reality ... still to this day.
Having said all that, the movie has some very actors in it ... and some very dramatic moments to say the least. Many times if a colored kid is being singled out and made responsible for a crime, they plead for a bargain ... which is anything but that, especially if they are innocent. This goes to the court ... which can turn out to be even worse than taking a plea deal ... what will happen here? Well I am not going to tell you, you have to watch if you want to know ... but be prepared for everything ...
Having said all that, the movie has some very actors in it ... and some very dramatic moments to say the least. Many times if a colored kid is being singled out and made responsible for a crime, they plead for a bargain ... which is anything but that, especially if they are innocent. This goes to the court ... which can turn out to be even worse than taking a plea deal ... what will happen here? Well I am not going to tell you, you have to watch if you want to know ... but be prepared for everything ...
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाMichael Imperioli was originally cast as Anthony Petrocelli, but due to scheduling conflicts, Paul Ben-Victor replaced him.
- कनेक्शनReferenced in Flix Forum: Monster (2025)
- साउंडट्रैकSe Que Quieres
Written by Nicholas Jonathan Smith, Donald 'D'jon' Johnson, Vito A. Colapietro II (as Vito Colapietro) and Neely Dinkins Jr. (as Neely Dinkins)
Performed by Nick Olate
Courtesy of Choppa Records/The Co-Stars Ent
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 38 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें