In Restless Dreams: The Music of Paul Simon

The outstanding songs of Simon included in this film are beyond entertaining... they express soulful themes. Director Alex Gibney made a wise choice in structuring this film. Thankfully, there are no talking heads which so many music docs depend on. The conversations mostly flow from Paul Simon, during studio sessions and various concerts.

The scene about Simon's brief marriage to Carrie Fisher focused more on photographs of them. I felt that all three of his wives got the short shrift. While it's clear that Simon adores his wife Edie, and they've shared a long, successful partnership, she could have been highlighted more.

The film makes several references to the struggles between Simon and Garfunkel, and why Paul decided to forge his own path. He makes a few biting comments which could be misconstrued, but maybe at this point Simon is not too concerned about what fans and critics might say.

As good as this film is, there was a missed opportunity in Part 2 regarding the brilliant musicians, vocalists, and dancers from South Africa, Jamaica, and Brazil. These gifted people were essential contributors in expanding Simon's repertoire. They are shown on old footage, but most are not acknowledged by name. The film could have remedied this by using screen text, to give them their due credit. Also wonderful are the vocalists from VOCES8, who recently worked with Simon.

The historical overview of Simon and Garfunkel and their breakup is excellent. Less excellent is Paul Simon in his homemade Texas studio putting together his latest solo album.

So lets's talk about the Simon and Garfunkel history, then, where we learn some very insightful things. Paul Simon is an excellent songwriter and his songwriting during the 1960's was beautiful, mesmerizing and groundbreaking. It spoke to the generation that grew up in the NYC metropolitan area and were impacted by the major events of the 1960's including assassinations and an extremely unpopular war. For the most part this generation was Liberal, open minded socially, politically, musically. Anti-war, anti-racism, pro-women's rights, pro-culture in general. These were Simon and Garfunkel's people and they are the one's who showed up for the Simon and Garfunkel reunion in Central Park in 1981 in an extremely emotional outpouring of love. A love of a by gone time of open mindedness and culture that Simon and Garfunkel represent.

Simon's songwriting spoke to this cultured generation but he had vital help - the beautiful, angelic voice of Art Garfunkel which transformed Simon's songs from very good to the stratosphere of angelic beauty. And why these albums are all classics.

Simon needed Garfunkel and they never should have split up. What they created together was not just good songs but something far more - great art!

Why the split? It wasn't either musician it was a comic turned movie maker, Mike Nichols, who pushed Garfunkel into acting. A horribly bad, selfish move by Nichols who knew full well it would break up the pair. An unconscionable act of sabotage that destroyed great art. I can't watch any of Nichols movies because of this.

Paul and Alex Gibney did a beautiful job...tastefully done, showcasing different eras of Paul's incredible career

It was awesome to see behind the scenes of Paul's process...I liked the chronological approach personally

A true portrait of a resilient, brilliant artist whose songs have moved us for years!

The only thing that could have enhanced the experience is an Art Garfunkel interview but obviously that would have been tough to pull off! I'm probably asking for too much!

I hope to see Paul live someday...hopefully his hearing improves and he can tour Seven Psalms. It would be a treat to see

Thank you Paul for your contributions to our culture

Ryan from chicago.

Great history of the first years of his and Garfunkel's lives and careers. Those albums and performances are in the pantheon of 60's musical creations. Way too much footage, though, of him noodling his new album. And isn't the guitar lick he channeled in a dream the same one from Anji 60 years ago?

But the episode ends with a completely unnecessary and cruel remark about his ex partner: After saying his five year friendship with him was his first great friendship with someone who got him, he then says Garfunkel is now someone he never wants to see again. At this point in their lives, was it really necessary to make such a cruel public rejection? I'm sure he had the clout to remove that even if it wasn't his choice to include it.

Let me begin by saying some thought Paul said at the end of episode 1 that Garfunkel was a person he never wanted to see again. But that's not what he said. He was talking about himself never wanting to "see" or be that person again. Himself, being that way..

I really enjoyed it. They were truly a unique duo and so talented. Still are, really. Unfortunately, and also ironically, Paul has lost most of his hearing but he's still writing songs. Reminds me of Johnny Cash at close to the end of his life, and his reflecting on his life through song.

It brought back a lot of memories of troubled, but good, times in a lot of ways.