Baby Cat

First you need to find and watch the absolutely worst movie Ed Wood Jr. Ever made. Then imagine a movie three hundred times worse than that and you will have Baby Cat.

It's absolute junk disguised as a movie. It's so bad that about a quarter of it is filmed in front of a green screen with images added to pretend to be the out doors, or other stuff. And people in their basement on youtube do a better job.

The direction is the pits. Some scenes are actually edited to zoom in on the action AFTER they were filmed. It's disorienting and unprofessional.

To be fair, the cat is hot, even if she does the worst cat impersonation on the planet Earth. But hot isnt enough to get over the horrible production "values," the lack of professional direction, the poor script and the lack of acting on a level above 3rd grade.

People who are giving this 10's or even 8's either didnt see the movie, or worked on it. There is no way anyone can give this a good score. It's dismal filmmaking at it's worst.

If you can look past the worst green screen work I've ever seen, the acting, script, nonsensical dialog , and non-story...you may enjoy this "movie" . There's a hot actress as the "cat" and that's about the only redeeming factor. If its meant to be a softcore porno, it's def not that...its more like a mishmash of scenes that make little to bo sense.

All the bad editing and sfx are soo distracting and if it was done slightly better it would make up for this.

Clearly a production with no real experience or eye for filmmaking...I would avoid this unless your having a "bad movie night" then it may be just right!

First I have to give credit to Natalie Cotter (Dana) and Fawn Winters (Cat). They gave their all in their roles in perhaps one of the worst movies ever made. Dana moves to LA, and works writing reports for an oil company. As an example of how bad the script it, she is stated as making reports of where to dig for oil. Oil is drilled! The office is a total joke. There is a back story of drugs, using stereotypes of mob activity. It is thrown in at random. When she opens her door, there is clearly green screen to show a balcony, except the scene jumps all over the place, and the hues change. The color hues also change in various scenes, and at least one green screen isn't even properly placed for being background. There are even place cards for scenes that are part of the movie. Some of the inserted scenes defy any logic. There is a difference between low budget and shear incompetence. This is the latter. There are movies that are so bad they are good. This one is simply bad. The two actors gave their all in their roles, so I will recognize that, and give it two stars. They aren't responsible for the incompetence.

This film will make you question your sanity.

Dana (played to perfection by Natalie Cotter) moves into her new apartment and adopts the neighborhood cat.

Except it's not an actual cat but a scantily clad young woman dressed as a cat.

Meanwhile, her job is a joke, she's broke and her love life is . . . Well, okay, her job is only a joke because her boss holds meetings with invisible employees and her co-worker doesn't try to explain it.

And then she falls in love with the cat. And it's hot sapphic passion at first but falls into the trap of ordinary couples--is there more to this relationship outside of sex? Does Lori, the cat , want to get married or have kids? The telegrams she mysteriously is able to send before having such a conversation tells very little about her feelings. But it does explain the goings on in the neighborhood.

Trust me.

There's also a drug war going on that Dana sees on the news and apparently some mysterious being is responsible for taking out the notorious drug cartels. I won't spoil that connection, but it did make me clamor for a big budget remake starring Amy Schumer and Anna Kendrick with stunt choreography by the John Wick team.

But Hollywood needs to keep their hands off this one. It's the low budget weirdness, down to the moving chroma key background that really makes this story work.

And props to a groundbreaking performance by Socks Whitmore as a transitioning non-binary person, played perfectly straight, no pun intended. Lisa London also shines as the mom.

This is the kind of film that Cinema Epoch had been known for in its inception from Mad Cowgirl to Blue Dream. Hope they keep it up!

That would be a better name. Because the final cut of this movie is so bad.

• They (probably the editor) zoomed very noticable in on de material in some shots. That's just not done. Because you lose your quality. As is seen in this movie. The zooming was done so bad, you'd think the editor accidently fell asleep on the keyboard en never noticed what he just did.

• Than the keying. Are there even application that don't have an instand key-effect in the effecten bin. (Drop on clip and select color.)

In one instance they open a door and there is something going in the shot wich could have easely been prevented by a simple mask.

• The most amateurish is the fact that the editor left a flash frame. Around the 17th minute.

• And never use a moving background when you a going to key a shot over that (moving) shot.

So why did I watch the whole thing and why the two stars?

The two main girls. They were great. In their own way.