Phoenix
- 2023
- 2 घं 12 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
6.0/10
1.1 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
कहानी तब आगे बढ़ती है जब नायक जॉन और उसका परिवार अपने जीवन के पुनर्निर्माण की आशा के साथ एक दूर द्वीप के गांव में स्थानांतरित हो जाते हैं। लेकिन नियति ने उनके लिए कुछ और ही योजना बना रखी है।कहानी तब आगे बढ़ती है जब नायक जॉन और उसका परिवार अपने जीवन के पुनर्निर्माण की आशा के साथ एक दूर द्वीप के गांव में स्थानांतरित हो जाते हैं। लेकिन नियति ने उनके लिए कुछ और ही योजना बना रखी है।कहानी तब आगे बढ़ती है जब नायक जॉन और उसका परिवार अपने जीवन के पुनर्निर्माण की आशा के साथ एक दूर द्वीप के गांव में स्थानांतरित हो जाते हैं। लेकिन नियति ने उनके लिए कुछ और ही योजना बना रखी है।
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I think the bar is set so low for horror in Malayalam cinema that anything mildly intriguing can cause a few ripples among our largely unexposed audiences. The case in point is Phoenix, which can easily be bifurcated into a horror drama in the first half and a romantic tragedy in the second.
Between the two, the more engaging elements are in the first, and while the second promises an old-school romance, the dramatic dialogues often took me out of the setup. (This was the case in Aashiq Abu's reimagining of Neelavelicham too.) Of course, I understand the director's intention to portray the slowness of the '70s, and this works in parts. The integration of the cholera epidemic into the plot also offers a different backdrop, as opposed to the usual "killing off" of a central character to evoke grief.
From a writing standpoint, I think Midhun Manuel picked bits and pieces from various works (like the Insidious films and Gabriel Garcia Marquez's classic novel Love in the Time of Cholera), probably his personal favorites, and gave it his own spin. Sam CS' music works in parts, but there were too many songs in the second half, further hampering the flow. As a debut director, I feel Vishnu Bharathan is promising, and given a more fast-paced screenplay, he can truly shine. Some shot choices are solid, especially one that uses the split diopter lens. The visual effects are not bad.
Coming to the performances, Baby Aavni's "possessed" act was quite good. Aju Varghese adds one more feather to his cap in a role that initially requires him to be a chauvinist, and later an inquisitive (and somewhat scared) man of the house. Abhirami Bose looks good and even exudes the '70s girl aura, but the lipsync was off in places. Chandunadh's performance occasionally borders on the theatrical, but there's been visible progress over the years. Anoop Menon and the rest are adequate.
P. S. Where's that creepy scene of the priest (Rony David Raj) at the seaside cemetery that was in the trailer? In fact, that scene was what made me want to watch the film in the first place.
Between the two, the more engaging elements are in the first, and while the second promises an old-school romance, the dramatic dialogues often took me out of the setup. (This was the case in Aashiq Abu's reimagining of Neelavelicham too.) Of course, I understand the director's intention to portray the slowness of the '70s, and this works in parts. The integration of the cholera epidemic into the plot also offers a different backdrop, as opposed to the usual "killing off" of a central character to evoke grief.
From a writing standpoint, I think Midhun Manuel picked bits and pieces from various works (like the Insidious films and Gabriel Garcia Marquez's classic novel Love in the Time of Cholera), probably his personal favorites, and gave it his own spin. Sam CS' music works in parts, but there were too many songs in the second half, further hampering the flow. As a debut director, I feel Vishnu Bharathan is promising, and given a more fast-paced screenplay, he can truly shine. Some shot choices are solid, especially one that uses the split diopter lens. The visual effects are not bad.
Coming to the performances, Baby Aavni's "possessed" act was quite good. Aju Varghese adds one more feather to his cap in a role that initially requires him to be a chauvinist, and later an inquisitive (and somewhat scared) man of the house. Abhirami Bose looks good and even exudes the '70s girl aura, but the lipsync was off in places. Chandunadh's performance occasionally borders on the theatrical, but there's been visible progress over the years. Anoop Menon and the rest are adequate.
P. S. Where's that creepy scene of the priest (Rony David Raj) at the seaside cemetery that was in the trailer? In fact, that scene was what made me want to watch the film in the first place.
I lost so much and was really devastated, I had to seek help until I was directed to Mrs. Sharon O'Neil and her Recovery company and Foundatioan that helped me to recover all the money I had lost. It was really worth it. I will be happy to share my experience with anybody, you can also connect with him for help and assistance for a successful and secured investment without any loss of funds. Mail Her, sharonrecoveringexperts @ gm ail . C om
WhatsApp; + 44 7438 687236
Are you able to recover your lost investment funds had to seek help i was directed Sharon O'Neil VIA , sharonrecoveringexperts. @gmaail. Com.
Dumb movie. Lacks creativity. Bad script and super bad acting. Even in the 70s Malayalam cinema has produced far better movies than this. Director need to go back to school and learn the craft. This movie is mediocre at best. Fails badly as romantic movie and failed miserably as a horror movie. Don't waste your time on this. This is a juvenile attempt at movie making. Can't believe such an amateur and stupid script made it to production. Better luck next time to the crew. Please don't torture viewers by making mediocre movies. There are a lot of other career options. This is the worst movie that I've ever seen.
Not sure what horror element was there in the movie. The movie echoed mediocre acting and editing. The sound was another aspect which lacked the finesse a horror genre needed. The director was not sure on how to hold its character ls. Camera was also really really amateur. It just could nor build up the essence. The chemistry between Freddy and Rose also echoed mediocrity. Screenplay was one which needed expert hand especially when you deal with horror movies. The team needs a lot to learn before they attempt a tested genre like this. Not sure what was the inspiration to churn out such a mediocrity.
A huge let down. This could have been treated better.
A huge let down. This could have been treated better.
Usually Malayalam movie have a unique style and story but this one is blsub par below normal c rated old horror story and it's slow and dragging , you can tell the whole story in 10 mins , very disappointing
Avoid this and save 2 hours of your time..
There is no horror, boring romance, dull sub par acting , not at all interesting.
Any cheap Hollywood haunting house horror movies will be thousand times better than this so called hooro movie.
Usually Malayalam movie have a unique style and story but this one is blsub par below normal c rated old horror story and it's slow and dragging , you can tell the whole story in 10 mins , very disappointing Avoid this and save 2 hours of your time.. There is no horror, boring romance, dull sub par acting , not at all interesting.
Any cheap Hollywood haunting house horror movies will be thousand times better than this so called hooro movie.
Usually Malayalam movie have a unique style and story but this one is blsub par below normal c rated old horror story and it's slow and dragging , you can tell the whole story in 10 mins , very disappointing Avoid this and save 2 hours of your time.. There is no horror, boring romance, dull sub par acting , not at all interesting.
Any cheap Hollywood haunting house horror movies will be thousand times better than this so called hooro movie.
Any cheap Hollywood haunting house horror movies will be thousand times better than this so called hooro movie.
Usually Malayalam movie have a unique style and story but this one is blsub par below normal c rated old horror story and it's slow and dragging , you can tell the whole story in 10 mins , very disappointing Avoid this and save 2 hours of your time.. There is no horror, boring romance, dull sub par acting , not at all interesting.
Any cheap Hollywood haunting house horror movies will be thousand times better than this so called hooro movie.
Usually Malayalam movie have a unique style and story but this one is blsub par below normal c rated old horror story and it's slow and dragging , you can tell the whole story in 10 mins , very disappointing Avoid this and save 2 hours of your time.. There is no horror, boring romance, dull sub par acting , not at all interesting.
Any cheap Hollywood haunting house horror movies will be thousand times better than this so called hooro movie.
क्या आपको पता है
- साउंडट्रैकEnnile Punchiri
Vinayak Sasikumar
Kapil Kapilan, K.S Chithra
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $13,625
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 12 मिनट
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें