Grand Tour
- 2024
- 2 घं 9 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
6.5/10
2.3 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंEdward, civil servant, flees fiancée Molly on their wedding day in Rangoon, 1917. His travels replace panic with melancholy. Molly, set on marriage, amused by his escape, trails him across A... सभी पढ़ेंEdward, civil servant, flees fiancée Molly on their wedding day in Rangoon, 1917. His travels replace panic with melancholy. Molly, set on marriage, amused by his escape, trails him across Asia.Edward, civil servant, flees fiancée Molly on their wedding day in Rangoon, 1917. His travels replace panic with melancholy. Molly, set on marriage, amused by his escape, trails him across Asia.
- पुरस्कार
- 10 जीत और कुल 25 नामांकन
Rembrandt Beerens
- Príncipe Tailandês
- (as Rembrant Beerens)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Miguel Gomes Grand Tour is a visually mesmerizing film that feels like a love letter to Asia, celebrating its rich cultural heritage and landscapes. Every shot is carefully composed, with meticulous attention to framing and timing, creating a sense of immersion that invites the viewer into the world of the film. The use of real locations adds depth and authenticity, making the setting feel like an integral part of the story rather than just a backdrop.
The first chapter follows Edward as he flees from his fiancée, Molly, and embarks on a directionless journey. This section feels disconnected and almost lost, much like Edward himself. It's as the film is reflecting his emotional state aimlessly wandering without a clear path, allowing chance encounters to dictate his course.
In contrast, the second chapter, which follows Molly's determined pursuit of Edward, has a more defined sense of purpose. As she chases him across Asia, the narrative feels tighter, with more focus and direction. Molly's clear objective helps guide the audience through her journey, making it easier to connect with her.
The dialogue, primarily in Portuguese, was a refreshing highlight, and I found myself wishing for even more of it. It's rare for me to see a film where Portuguese takes center stage, and it adds another layer of uniqueness to the film.
In the end, Grand Tour is a beautiful, contemplative work, filled with stunning visuals, soundtrack and a clear sense of care in every frame. It's clear to see why Gomes was awarded Best Director at Cannes his passion for both the story and the setting is palpable in every moment.
The first chapter follows Edward as he flees from his fiancée, Molly, and embarks on a directionless journey. This section feels disconnected and almost lost, much like Edward himself. It's as the film is reflecting his emotional state aimlessly wandering without a clear path, allowing chance encounters to dictate his course.
In contrast, the second chapter, which follows Molly's determined pursuit of Edward, has a more defined sense of purpose. As she chases him across Asia, the narrative feels tighter, with more focus and direction. Molly's clear objective helps guide the audience through her journey, making it easier to connect with her.
The dialogue, primarily in Portuguese, was a refreshing highlight, and I found myself wishing for even more of it. It's rare for me to see a film where Portuguese takes center stage, and it adds another layer of uniqueness to the film.
In the end, Grand Tour is a beautiful, contemplative work, filled with stunning visuals, soundtrack and a clear sense of care in every frame. It's clear to see why Gomes was awarded Best Director at Cannes his passion for both the story and the setting is palpable in every moment.
A poem movie, reflexive about human condition, the human trivia that humans try to make as a huge and it's nothing. We humans make things important when nothing is important than our souls, the comfort for the spirit. The movie invites us to reflect about what is important to us. The different journeys through Grand Tour show the importance for us to keep faithful to ourselves. Why do we need the wealth positions? Why do we need to keep doing what is unpleasure? Does it worth while to die for what we believe? Maybe yes or maybe it doesn't matter the end but the moment only by itself and what we get at each time; future is only a ghost which decorates our minds towards the momentum.
And I don't mean the story alright? The artistic choices are downright baffling in a way that made me continuously ask myself "why". Why go through all this trouble to tell this story? Why this story? Why the odd language solutions? Why the anachronism? Is this about colonialism? I ought to be about colonialism because these people are terrible right?
I try to relax and enjoy the cinematic experience but experience what? The photo is good, the costumes are nice, the parts from modern day east Asia could have worked in a documentary. It's soup and meatloaf and dessert mixed as one dish. I would have liked it more if it was just abstract. Now I'm just annoyed, provoked and thinking whether I'm thinking too much or not thinking enough. At least the story will lead somewhere, right? Whelp, never mind.
I try to relax and enjoy the cinematic experience but experience what? The photo is good, the costumes are nice, the parts from modern day east Asia could have worked in a documentary. It's soup and meatloaf and dessert mixed as one dish. I would have liked it more if it was just abstract. Now I'm just annoyed, provoked and thinking whether I'm thinking too much or not thinking enough. At least the story will lead somewhere, right? Whelp, never mind.
This evening I have been to the cinema and seen Miguel Gomes' "Grand Tour 2024"
"SHOW DON'T TELL!" - IS a well known rule of storytelling, yet still this film chooses to use a narrator telling important parts of the story without playing them out!
Curious? Considering seeing it?
Don't! Unless you appreciate: the WEIRD, ABSTRACT and uncomprehensible?
7 (Seven) people in the audience walked out of the movie theatre during the film!
ONE next to me FELL ASLEEP and I would have let him sleep - IF it wasn't for him SNORING LOUDLY!
A QUOTE IN the film is: - "the Orient is uncomprehensible for white men!"
BUT ALAS I believe that some from the audiences comments after are correct: - "Pretentious crap"! And "frustrating ending"!
I - "soldiered through", because I am driven by curiosity and a desire to comprehend!
BUT it is an illogical mess: the: "English or American" characters speak Portuguese and some Asians spoke French! Yet they have conversations in respective languages!
It's supposed to be happening 1918, but suddenly we're in present time, cellphones modern cities and scooters!
Generally - DON'T!
"SHOW DON'T TELL!" - IS a well known rule of storytelling, yet still this film chooses to use a narrator telling important parts of the story without playing them out!
Curious? Considering seeing it?
Don't! Unless you appreciate: the WEIRD, ABSTRACT and uncomprehensible?
7 (Seven) people in the audience walked out of the movie theatre during the film!
ONE next to me FELL ASLEEP and I would have let him sleep - IF it wasn't for him SNORING LOUDLY!
A QUOTE IN the film is: - "the Orient is uncomprehensible for white men!"
BUT ALAS I believe that some from the audiences comments after are correct: - "Pretentious crap"! And "frustrating ending"!
I - "soldiered through", because I am driven by curiosity and a desire to comprehend!
BUT it is an illogical mess: the: "English or American" characters speak Portuguese and some Asians spoke French! Yet they have conversations in respective languages!
It's supposed to be happening 1918, but suddenly we're in present time, cellphones modern cities and scooters!
Generally - DON'T!
Never have I ever been so annoyed at the cinema, but stayed for the whole thing out of respect for other viewers.
This movie has no plot, no relatable characters, no compelling story. The comedic reliefs are utterly unfunny (really, why does anyone laughs at women cursing at men anymore? Peak boomer humor). It does not evoke any feelings other than a deep feeling of irritation and wasted time. It's really oddly paced and quite frankly, boring.
Some shots are pretty (if you've never been to Asia) and I have to appreciate the use of traditional asian music.
However, it's not enough to make up for how badly it is structured and how really pointless this movie is. One of the worst films I've ever seen (and I'm usually quite generous with my ratings).
This movie has no plot, no relatable characters, no compelling story. The comedic reliefs are utterly unfunny (really, why does anyone laughs at women cursing at men anymore? Peak boomer humor). It does not evoke any feelings other than a deep feeling of irritation and wasted time. It's really oddly paced and quite frankly, boring.
Some shots are pretty (if you've never been to Asia) and I have to appreciate the use of traditional asian music.
However, it's not enough to make up for how badly it is structured and how really pointless this movie is. One of the worst films I've ever seen (and I'm usually quite generous with my ratings).
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाPeriod scenes were shot in studio. Present day scenes were shot live on location, without script.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Büyük Yolculuk
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $53,804
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $9,176
- 30 मार्च 2025
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $8,96,063
- चलने की अवधि
- 2 घं 9 मि(129 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.66 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें