पूरी दुनिया जब कैप्टन विलियम बी स्टैनाफ़ोर्थ को मंगल ग्रह के एकल मिशन पर काम करते देख रही है, तो उन्हें अपने मस्तिष्क और बाह्य अंतरिक्ष के गूढ़ स्थलों में तल्लीन होकर एक असफ़ल जहाज़ को मंगल ... सभी पढ़ेंपूरी दुनिया जब कैप्टन विलियम बी स्टैनाफ़ोर्थ को मंगल ग्रह के एकल मिशन पर काम करते देख रही है, तो उन्हें अपने मस्तिष्क और बाह्य अंतरिक्ष के गूढ़ स्थलों में तल्लीन होकर एक असफ़ल जहाज़ को मंगल ग्रह के तल पर सुरक्षित उतारने की प्रक्रिया का नेतृत्व करना होगा.पूरी दुनिया जब कैप्टन विलियम बी स्टैनाफ़ोर्थ को मंगल ग्रह के एकल मिशन पर काम करते देख रही है, तो उन्हें अपने मस्तिष्क और बाह्य अंतरिक्ष के गूढ़ स्थलों में तल्लीन होकर एक असफ़ल जहाज़ को मंगल ग्रह के तल पर सुरक्षित उतारने की प्रक्रिया का नेतृत्व करना होगा.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 जीत
- Featured in Civilian Astronaut Footage
- (as a different name)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The slow descend into madness, his monologues, it is good.
A good story isn't about a lot of action, a lot of events, it lies in the subtleties and how they come together.
Just a good movie. I guess, blade runner also had a bad reception when it was released. This movie is perhaps not meant for this generation of action spoiled viewers. I really hope this will get some appreciation along the line, so that we may see more of this quality. Real sci-fi fans will love this movie for what it is.
Alarm bells started to ring in my mind almost immediately. The personality of the guy was unstable to being cowboyish. The science didn't add up. The atmospheric dye effects had no connection to space or to the story. The water got contaminated by a battery short?! The astronaut's motivation to go to Mars was specifically because he liked the feeling of dying. I mean, come on!
But even with all this aside - and I am capable to putting aside the technical aspects - the film is actually saying nothing concrete. Should we abandon going to space because it is folly or is it that the writer has so little faith in NASA that he thinks all astronauts will be allowed to be depressed artists that write their journal with pencils and feel lonely in space? Is there a point to all the inner dialogues of the guy or is he just losing his mind in this really slow movie? We don't know.
Bottom line: I liked the production values of the film and the acting, but I couldn't get my head around what the writer/director was trying to say. It's time artsy folk understand that not only engineers are a completely different type of people from them, but that writing and directing your own movie is only rarely a good idea.
As other reviewers already stated: if you're looking for an action-packed sci-fi or anticipation movie, move along because this one is not for you. If you're looking for an uplifting, Hollywood-style feel good movie... move along. If you're after great landscapes of Mars and big spaceships roaming about, you should also probably look for other movies. Yet this movie has a lot going for it, as long as you realize what you're in for:
This is a story about a character who is willing to leave everything behind for the greater good, for science and for the slim chance of becoming the first human on Mars. The whole movie is basically a "huis clos", a closed stage in a cramped vessel, where you follow a single individual during his journey of 270 days in space, alone. He has to fight boredom, madness and growing technical issues he is partly responsible for due to his overconfidence and his belief that he can solve everything on his own. He also has to cope with the burden of the entire humanity back on Earth cheering for him and placing the highest expectations on his shoulders. Yet he's just a man. Hopes, successes, failures... They are all part of the journey, and the lead character confronts each in a very believable way.
Acting is spot on (bravo Mark Strong), and the reactions never feel alien or unrealistic. FX are good enough, but this movie doesn't rely on them heavily at all.
There is one very big leap of faith the audience is supposed to make: I find it highly dubious for various reasons that humanity would send a single person on such a long journey without backup: way too dangerous. Yet if you're willing to go with it, you'll find this movie to picture a very believable analysis of human nature when confronted to loneliness, various pressures and challenging situations.
All in all, this movie is more of a psychological approach of long journeys in isolation and adversity, rather than a sci-fi/anticipation movie on colonizing Mars.
I would definitely recommend this movie to those among you who like slow-paced, "psychological" movies such as (with some similarities): - Solaris (2002) - 2001 Space odyssey - Silent running - Das Boot (in some ways) - 127 hours (in some ways) - The survivalist (in some ways)
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाWorsley (Charles Baker) and Greenstreet (Anders Danielsen Lie) (the crew of the refuelling station) are both named after members of the crew of Ernest Shackleton's ill-fated Antarctic expedition of 1914-1917. They were the Captain and First Officer respectively, as they are in this film.
- गूफ़Throughout the film, when Captain William Stanaforth communicates with Earth by, there is no delay in receiving a reply. The farther from Earth he is the delay would increase to many minutes between sending a signal and receiving a reply.
- भाव
William D. Stanaforth: Our bodies are more space than matter. There's an unfathomable distance between each atom, each particle. What keeps us solid? Why don't we dissolve?
- कनेक्शनReferenced in It Takes Two: Sol Brothers (2021)
टॉप पसंद
- How long is Approaching the Unknown?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $10,232
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $6,476
- 5 जून 2016
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $10,232
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 30 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.78 : 1