Agent Recon

My son and I watched this because we are big Chuck Norris fans. We should have trusted the other reviews. Not only did the plot make almost no sense, it seemed to forgets on plot most of the time. You learn at the start that bad guys can only be killed with shots to the liver (so not a spoiler IMHO) yet most shots seem to be to the shoulder. Camera work really enjoyed lots of close ups over and over. They are in the desert, no it's forest mountains, I mean a cave, what? It just made no sense. Acting was average but hard to tell since lack of a plot tended to distract. Green screen was glaringly obvious, especially at the end.

When you write. Direct, and bill yourself above Chuck Norris, you know you're making a horrible movie that's soul purpose is to stroke your own ego.

I only watched this because I saw Chuck Norris and Marc Singer were in it, but there was no saving this disaster.

Chuck Norris and Marc Singer deserve better. I honestly feel sorry for both Chuck Norris and Marc Singer that they're in such a bad place that they now have to act in movies like this.

If you want to be an actor so badly that you have t write, direct, and star in your own movie, please do not get famous actors to be in your film. It hurts them and made you look bad as well.

Sometimes I like to watch movies that have a score of 3 or lower out of 10, just to see how terrible it is. How bad can it really be? I never believe a score can be that low and each and every time I go yeah that movie deserves it. I've seen a few movies like this now, and a lot of them have one thing in common that helps them all seem to be churned out by the same terrible movie factory. No it's not the bad acting , choppy editing, repetitive scores, even more bad acting and nonsensical writing. No, what they have in common is the protagonist, writer, producer and director are all the same person, instead of doing one thing well, or at the very least adequately, they do multiple jobs terribly. This may seem mean, but I don't think there is anyone else to blame, he took all the jobs. With only a handful of reviews it is possible that Derek Ting will read this, but really it doesn't matter because it won't discourage him from doing what he does. The idea that he can go around and tell people he's an actor, director, writer and producer irks me a little but what can you do? Irks me a little but what can you do.

2/10 because at least the camera was in focus and the audio was clear.

This is so so so so bad, and ive seen all of Chucks movies and all other action movies from 80's.(gen Z er) all 10 times better than this. This even feels like it was made in the 80s. Only giving 1 star for the movie but the 2 extra just for Chuck being active again after 12 years. I cant say what is worse, the actions/fights or the dialects?? No build up of the characters. The engineering in the scenes is also so so bad, and im an engineer.

Poor Chuck for having do deal with this. I think a college class could have made a better movie.

I stopped watching it after 25 minutes of realy realy trying to follow through it.....i tried.

I usually don't review films on here, but I had to voice my disgust. The acting is absolutely horrible. Chuck Norris is literally sitting still and talking like he is reading straight off a script for most of the movie. Then toward the end he stands in the middle of the open shooting a minigun he is holding, which is magically shooting endless bullets despite not having any ammo belt feeding it. Then he starts punching and kicking the bad guys just like any cranky 80-something year old man would. Almost the entire movie takes place in one compound out in the middle of nowhere. It is like some school kid wrote this script and directed this movie for a school assignment. I don't think the SyFy channel will even ever show this, which would say something.