अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंThe greatest love story of all time, set as an original pop musical. Based on the real story that inspired William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet".The greatest love story of all time, set as an original pop musical. Based on the real story that inspired William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet".The greatest love story of all time, set as an original pop musical. Based on the real story that inspired William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet".
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
Max C. Parker
- Benvolio
- (as Max Parker)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
There are some positives to this film:
Costume design
Scenery/staging
Some of the cast - Derek Jacobi is a National Treasure, so we must assume that he was on holiday when his agent signed him up for this and you have to wonder how badly the Ruperts (Everett and Graves) needed the money but Jeremy Isaacs can have no excuse - he seems to be in everything these days.
But so much that is wrong (or downright bad) that it's difficult to know where to begin... The continuous intrusive music score - it's bad enough that it's there and I can't find words to stress the lie of "the greatest music of our time" (IMDb quote) but it's worse because cinemas turn the volume up so much. It is constant and drowns out much of the awful ...
Dialogue - trying desperately to hint back to Shakespeare and failing at every turn. There's even a moment when one of the cast says "oh wait" before delivering half a line from The Bard. And then there are the ...
Accents. OK so 14th century Verona would be a bit of a melting pot of cultures but Jeremy Isaacs' fake Yorkshire accent is just distracting even given everyone changing to American accents when they sing.
But the scrapings from the bottom of the barrel must be the total lack of chemistry between Juliet and Romeo. So little chemistry that no amount of their bad acting can make even a glimmer of a spark. It's actually a relief when they "die" (though being unconscious can't stop them singing)
At 2hrs 2mins of life that you will never get back, this is definitely one to miss but there's a closing threat of "to be continued..."
But so much that is wrong (or downright bad) that it's difficult to know where to begin... The continuous intrusive music score - it's bad enough that it's there and I can't find words to stress the lie of "the greatest music of our time" (IMDb quote) but it's worse because cinemas turn the volume up so much. It is constant and drowns out much of the awful ...
Dialogue - trying desperately to hint back to Shakespeare and failing at every turn. There's even a moment when one of the cast says "oh wait" before delivering half a line from The Bard. And then there are the ...
Accents. OK so 14th century Verona would be a bit of a melting pot of cultures but Jeremy Isaacs' fake Yorkshire accent is just distracting even given everyone changing to American accents when they sing.
But the scrapings from the bottom of the barrel must be the total lack of chemistry between Juliet and Romeo. So little chemistry that no amount of their bad acting can make even a glimmer of a spark. It's actually a relief when they "die" (though being unconscious can't stop them singing)
At 2hrs 2mins of life that you will never get back, this is definitely one to miss but there's a closing threat of "to be continued..."
You'll either love or hate this movie, based on the reviews it's getting. It's only loosely based on Shakespeare's play so throw that expectation out. On the positive side, the production value is good and it has Derek Jacoby in a major role, a good sign. But you know it's sus when the writer, director, and producer are the same person (a Bogart) and another Bogart is an additional producer as well as responsible for writing all the songs, of which there were way too many and they sounded all the same. At one point one of the main characters was unconscious and I was thinking "well at least she won't sing now" but I was sadly disappointed. If you like a lot of pop songs mixed in with the plot, you might go for this. Personally I enjoyed a silent car ride home after the movie. Tip: Ask for a subtitle machine at the theater because otherwise you might not be able to catch all the dialogue.
While I initially anticipated Shakespearean verse, this film's use of modern English enhances its accessibility. Unlike many adaptations, the narrative also deviates from the original source material. The tension escalates palpably when Juliet, newly wed to Romeo, learns of her impending marriage to Paris the very next day. Although the plot's progression may feel somewhat abrupt, it effectively underscores the doomed romance of the young lovers. Furthermore, the fighting scenes between MERCUTIO and Tybalt were remarkably intense and dramatic. Ultimately, the film concludes with a surprising yet logical twist that offers the audience a greater sense of closure.
There are so, so many reasons this movie was a failure that to enumerate them would be an exercise in exhaustion. I think the most annoying part was also the most ridiculous: everyone talked in different accents, and sang in others. For example, Romeo and Juliet both use something like RP or a southern English accent, but Romeo's father uses a distinct Northern English brogue. Juliet's parents sound the same as her, for whatever reason. Other characters' accents are undeniably American, though we are supposed to believe they're all (or mostly) native residents of the same city. To confuse matters further, everyone sings in an American accent!
As for the rest, the music was poorly written and just as poorly produced, the script (all modern English) was practically phoned in, and the cinematography was amateurish. The worst offense, however, was a complete disregard for key character moments and interactions that lovers of Shakespeare cherish from the original play. Phrases and lines from the source text are haphazardly re-contextualized-and delivered so carelessly-that they lose their original power, poetry, and philosophical punch. After close to an hour of watching this joke of a production, I decided to revoke the rest of the time I had originally entrusted to the film (during the apothecary's song, if that matters). Maybe that undercuts the validity of my review, but I don't care. Enduring the rest of that awful movie isn't worth bolstering the arguments of an online review that hardly anyone will read.
In fairness, I liked the imagery of the musical scene where the main characters have parted ways from the church but are still together "in their hearts," or whatever, but ONLY on an aesthetic level, because everything else about that scene is creatively tragic.
As for the rest, the music was poorly written and just as poorly produced, the script (all modern English) was practically phoned in, and the cinematography was amateurish. The worst offense, however, was a complete disregard for key character moments and interactions that lovers of Shakespeare cherish from the original play. Phrases and lines from the source text are haphazardly re-contextualized-and delivered so carelessly-that they lose their original power, poetry, and philosophical punch. After close to an hour of watching this joke of a production, I decided to revoke the rest of the time I had originally entrusted to the film (during the apothecary's song, if that matters). Maybe that undercuts the validity of my review, but I don't care. Enduring the rest of that awful movie isn't worth bolstering the arguments of an online review that hardly anyone will read.
In fairness, I liked the imagery of the musical scene where the main characters have parted ways from the church but are still together "in their hearts," or whatever, but ONLY on an aesthetic level, because everything else about that scene is creatively tragic.
Was surprised how well they did with the music that they advertised as modern.
Jamie Ward as Romero and Clara Rugaard as Juliet give a very good performance as the title characters, with great show of emotions through their acting that added tot heir characters.
Seeing Rebel Wilson in a non-comedic role was something to get used to, but, she did a very good job with the Lady Capulet character
This is the classic story, very good acting and songs. The songs did the story justice and I am already looking to get a copy of the soundtrack.
The continual telling of Romeo and Juliet in different versions with different settings never gets old and this version continues that line of success with a twist I will not tell as it is something you will need to see.
If you enjoy Romeo and Juliet, I would highly reccomend this movie to you.
Jamie Ward as Romero and Clara Rugaard as Juliet give a very good performance as the title characters, with great show of emotions through their acting that added tot heir characters.
Seeing Rebel Wilson in a non-comedic role was something to get used to, but, she did a very good job with the Lady Capulet character
This is the classic story, very good acting and songs. The songs did the story justice and I am already looking to get a copy of the soundtrack.
The continual telling of Romeo and Juliet in different versions with different settings never gets old and this version continues that line of success with a twist I will not tell as it is something you will need to see.
If you enjoy Romeo and Juliet, I would highly reccomend this movie to you.
क्या आपको पता है
- साउंडट्रैकStranger
Performed by Clara Rugaard and Jamie Ward
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Juliet & Romeo?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Джульетта и Ромео
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $4,56,623
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $2,89,489
- 11 मई 2025
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $4,65,008
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 2 मिनट
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें