Snabba cash - Livet deluxe

What I will always remind from this film is the long take heist sequence and some scenes related to the preparation of the heist, the drills in the empty abandoned warehouse. Like a military operation. The heist, that's only what I liked, I loved, in this movie. That's the third or fourth time I see it and only for this reason. I forget the rest, as the two other EASY MONEY films. Last week, I reviewed THE QUIET ONES, proposing a very similar heist, in a security complex facility for armored trucks. This very movie here is rather a bit complex, too much for me. But it's not a crap, not at all. I just give my opinion and also my feeling.

I came across this trilogy simply by seeing a trailer. I thought that it would be a straight flick about the mob but it wasn't. It's a typical Swedish flick or trilogy by which I mean, it moves slow, it's full of subplots and you just ants to know how things will work out.

If you haven't seen the first two episodes then you can't pick in on this one and even as you may have seen the other you it still can be confusing.

This one has the best action and in the trilogy. even as it isn't a well known trilogy, it is still worth picking up.

Gore 1/5 Nudity 1/5 Effects 2/5 Story 2,5/5 Comedy 0/5

And so concludes a Scandinavian crime thriller along the lines of other triptychs like Department Q and Pusher. I like these films because, in spite of their faults, they are still intriguing. Snabba Cash is no exception. I thought the handsome Swedish guy was going to be the main character but it turned out to be the Serb's daughter and the Spaniard. Who knew? Recommended? Sure, why not. Could've been worse.

Overall, a solid ending to a well crafted gangster trilogy. Joel K. only has a handful of scenes, which is the primary weakness in an otherwise nicely done film. I do want to read the books on which these films are based. And that is a good sign from my perspective.

The original 'Easy Money' was an above-average thriller about an ordinary guy who gets involved with gangsters; the sequel basically re-hashed the same plot, but more cheesily. This third, hastily-bashed out film, is easily the worst of the lot, a thriller with an amateurishly complex plot and equally amateurishly simple acting, with a heavy reliance on flashbacks to retrospectively make sense of the story. The plot themes are only loosely connected to those of the earlier movies; the decision to turn killer Jorge into a romantic hero is a surprising one. Overall, this has a "straight to video" feel, and leaves the strong impression that the film-makers didn't know how to make a proper movie, couldn't afford it, or just couldn't be bothered. In any case, the discerning viewer doesn't need to watch the trilogy to its end.