Kadak Singh
- 2023
- 2 घं 8 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
6.2/10
6 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
वित्तीय अपराध विभाग के एक अधिकारी एके श्रीवास्तव को प्रतिगामी भूलने की बीमारी है, जिसके बावजूद वह चिट फंड घोटाले के मामले को अलग-अलग दृष्टिकोणों को सुनकर सुलझाते हैं कि वह कौन थे और अस्पताल ... सभी पढ़ेंवित्तीय अपराध विभाग के एक अधिकारी एके श्रीवास्तव को प्रतिगामी भूलने की बीमारी है, जिसके बावजूद वह चिट फंड घोटाले के मामले को अलग-अलग दृष्टिकोणों को सुनकर सुलझाते हैं कि वह कौन थे और अस्पताल कैसे आए.वित्तीय अपराध विभाग के एक अधिकारी एके श्रीवास्तव को प्रतिगामी भूलने की बीमारी है, जिसके बावजूद वह चिट फंड घोटाले के मामले को अलग-अलग दृष्टिकोणों को सुनकर सुलझाते हैं कि वह कौन थे और अस्पताल कैसे आए.
- पुरस्कार
- 2 जीत और कुल 17 नामांकन
Jain Sanjiv
- Specialist journalists
- (as Sanjeev Kumar Jain)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The only reason I started watching the movie was because the lead actor is one of the few whose acting I respect.
The movie keeps you grasped till the end (not the Breaking Bad kind, but fairly) although the end was done all of the sudden. It felt like they went short of funds, or realised that its already reached two hours and needed to end :)
Pankaj Tripathi kept his promise and lead the movie decently, the script could definitely have been better. Thankfully it was not the Hero, Heroine, Romance, Villan kind (I usually don't watch the trailers of a movie).
Definitely one time watch, when you have time to kill.
The movie keeps you grasped till the end (not the Breaking Bad kind, but fairly) although the end was done all of the sudden. It felt like they went short of funds, or realised that its already reached two hours and needed to end :)
Pankaj Tripathi kept his promise and lead the movie decently, the script could definitely have been better. Thankfully it was not the Hero, Heroine, Romance, Villan kind (I usually don't watch the trailers of a movie).
Definitely one time watch, when you have time to kill.
In cinematic storytelling, the depiction of the main criminal isn't always straightforward. Directors use various techniques to create ambiguity, leaving viewers in suspense or confusion about the true identity of the antagonist. This deliberate ambiguity heightens suspense, engages the audience, and encourages them to pay closer attention to details throughout the movie.
One method used to obscure the main criminal's identity involves introducing multiple characters who seem equally suspicious or potentially guilty. These characters may possess conflicting motives or behave in ways that suggest their involvement in criminal activities, leaving viewers unsure about whom to consider as the main antagonist. Such storytelling techniques often keep viewers guessing until the movie's climax or final revelation.
Another strategy directors employ is the use of unreliable narrators or perspectives. Sometimes, the story unfolds through the eyes of a character with a subjective or biased viewpoint, clouding the audience's ability to discern the true antagonist. This narrative technique intentionally manipulates perceptions, leading viewers down different paths of suspicion and creating a sense of uncertainty about the main criminal's identity.
Additionally, some movies deliberately withhold crucial information until the very end. Clues, hints, or critical plot details necessary to identify the main antagonist might be strategically revealed only in the movie's closing scenes. This delayed disclosure challenges viewers to piece together information from earlier scenes retrospectively, reshaping their understanding of the characters and the unfolding events.
Furthermore, certain films explore the concept of moral ambiguity, blurring the lines between good and evil. In such narratives, multiple characters might exhibit shades of grey, making it difficult to categorize any one individual as the definitive main criminal. This deliberate blurring of moral boundaries adds complexity to the storytelling, forcing audiences to contemplate various perspectives and motivations.
Movies that intentionally leave the main criminal's identity ambiguous often aim to create an immersive and intellectually stimulating viewing experience. They prompt audiences to engage in active interpretation, discussion, and speculation, fostering a deeper connection to the storyline and its characters.
Ultimately, the deliberate ambiguity surrounding the main criminal's identity serves to challenge traditional storytelling conventions. It encourages viewers to embrace uncertainty, consider multiple possibilities, and actively participate in deciphering the intricacies of the plot. By leaving room for interpretation and debate, these films invite audiences to become more involved in the narrative, fostering a more immersive and thought-provoking cinematic experienc.
One method used to obscure the main criminal's identity involves introducing multiple characters who seem equally suspicious or potentially guilty. These characters may possess conflicting motives or behave in ways that suggest their involvement in criminal activities, leaving viewers unsure about whom to consider as the main antagonist. Such storytelling techniques often keep viewers guessing until the movie's climax or final revelation.
Another strategy directors employ is the use of unreliable narrators or perspectives. Sometimes, the story unfolds through the eyes of a character with a subjective or biased viewpoint, clouding the audience's ability to discern the true antagonist. This narrative technique intentionally manipulates perceptions, leading viewers down different paths of suspicion and creating a sense of uncertainty about the main criminal's identity.
Additionally, some movies deliberately withhold crucial information until the very end. Clues, hints, or critical plot details necessary to identify the main antagonist might be strategically revealed only in the movie's closing scenes. This delayed disclosure challenges viewers to piece together information from earlier scenes retrospectively, reshaping their understanding of the characters and the unfolding events.
Furthermore, certain films explore the concept of moral ambiguity, blurring the lines between good and evil. In such narratives, multiple characters might exhibit shades of grey, making it difficult to categorize any one individual as the definitive main criminal. This deliberate blurring of moral boundaries adds complexity to the storytelling, forcing audiences to contemplate various perspectives and motivations.
Movies that intentionally leave the main criminal's identity ambiguous often aim to create an immersive and intellectually stimulating viewing experience. They prompt audiences to engage in active interpretation, discussion, and speculation, fostering a deeper connection to the storyline and its characters.
Ultimately, the deliberate ambiguity surrounding the main criminal's identity serves to challenge traditional storytelling conventions. It encourages viewers to embrace uncertainty, consider multiple possibilities, and actively participate in deciphering the intricacies of the plot. By leaving room for interpretation and debate, these films invite audiences to become more involved in the narrative, fostering a more immersive and thought-provoking cinematic experienc.
Are you a cinephile like me who has, at some point or another, rewritten/reshot/recut a movie in your head right after watching it? If you are, you'd probably do the same after watching "Kadak Singh" too.
Even with an acclaimed director, an award-winning editor and a talented BGM composer working on this film, I fail to comprehend how a story with such potential could go so wrong on screen. We could've had a taut, darkly humorous thriller made up of a plethora of mysterious and intriguing characters (played by great actors) had the narrative and the editing allowed the same.
Disappointing. Frustrating.
Even with an acclaimed director, an award-winning editor and a talented BGM composer working on this film, I fail to comprehend how a story with such potential could go so wrong on screen. We could've had a taut, darkly humorous thriller made up of a plethora of mysterious and intriguing characters (played by great actors) had the narrative and the editing allowed the same.
Disappointing. Frustrating.
As usual amazing performance by Pankaj Tripathi. Jaya and Paresh were great too. Parvathy seemed a bit lost. She needs to do more research on her given character before accepting a role. Overall enjoyed watching this. Rating a solid 7.0.
Also rest of the cast was perfectly chosen for this. What a perfect vibe. The music was also great, with amazing lyrics, and great composition.. somewhat truly quoted "music is emotion" Through this song I hope we all feel it.. wish this song was a little longer .. Taba chake is just a unique gem.
I know this is not a big-budget movie, but utilized the available resources were well met.
Also rest of the cast was perfectly chosen for this. What a perfect vibe. The music was also great, with amazing lyrics, and great composition.. somewhat truly quoted "music is emotion" Through this song I hope we all feel it.. wish this song was a little longer .. Taba chake is just a unique gem.
I know this is not a big-budget movie, but utilized the available resources were well met.
Spoiler Alert: The film is based on chit fund scam and Pankaj Tripathi tries to solve it but looses his memory and then tries to recollect it by listening to various stories from everyone's perspective. Story and screenplay both are very weak. Sometimes you would be confused whether you are in present or in the past story of someone. How he solves in end is also not very convincing and abrupt. The scam could have been told in some more detail. Other actors have good role like Sanjana and Bengali actress but overall movie revolves around and is borne by AK Srivastava. Just a time pass watch nothing so great about this movie.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Kadak Singh?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 8 मिनट
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें