Rubberneck

This is a good movie. I don't understand its mediocre rating. Karpovsky is excellent and not afraid to make himself unlikeable. That takes guts, especially since he plays a voice of reason in Girls. I hope he gets more roles, because he's good. The female lead is also willing to play a non-evil, but equally unlikeable, character. Good acting all around. And the subject matter is a lot more important than what we are invited to watch in standard Hollywood fare. This movie is really worth watching.

A low budget attempt at psychological thriller using all the tropes. I wanted to like this movie, the main character was almost creepy and believable.

Generally well constructed. It's underrated at 5.4. It's a 6.7, 6.8 movie.

Being the script writer/director and leading male actor in a flim-flam of a movie featuring the world's ugliest leading man and women too pretty to even give this Goober the time of day.

So all credibility and believability for this hot mess goes straight out the window, and especially when you have such a pitiful specimen of a male. This clown has nothing going for him that would have lead to a hook-up in the first place. Sooooo, that's a big fat No with this milquetoast male attracting any of these women who are clearly out of his league.

And the good thing is that I saw this without having to ruin my evening by watching this crude.

This movie is really pathetic. The characters are all non-likeable and shallow. The script was written by someone who has never worked in an office environment. The movie never even got interesting until there was only 25 minutes left. The first 50 minutes were excruciatingly slow and dull. It isn't even very original. The first version of this movie was made in about 1930! This is such a dull, non-entertaining, and poorly written and directed. In good faith I cannot recommend this movie to anyone. I would avoid it at all costs. If you have ever watched an old "whodunit" movie, you have already seen this one.