हर हर महादेव

Many scenes are twisted in the name of cinematic liberty. Director should focus more on detailing of the history rather than unnecessary heroic dialogues and heroism of the characters.🙏🏻👎🏻 Dubbing mistake.. main lead can't speak proper Marathi.

All the things from look to characterisation is bad and worst part is it has released in multiple languages.

People who aren't aware of our history might think this is the correct version which it isn't.

Many scenes made up and shot by their convenience.

Lot of important characters aren't even mentioned in the scenes All in all this is a bad bad version of our history they have shown and people should ban such films.

I am unlucky to watch this movies on phone i missed this masterpiece on threathre . But still able to give gossebumbs . This is nota stroy of an ordinariy king and his friends this is the stroy of indian most courageable person. Someof scence is unforgotable and some secnece i dont like threr is some mistakes in movies but if we ignore itwe can watch this mastetrpiece charater selection is ok but 80 percentage but shard sir nailed the role he palyed vfxis better but not so much but i think sure marathi industri will progess it background score is good some scence devlop by director but they justofy it . Overall good to watch.

History is shown in wrong way.. one should not make and release such movies without verifying historical facts. What message we are trying to give future generations?? .

I strongly disagree on many scenes in it.

History is not present in factual way.. there are many controversial scenes. If you look at media reports on what chatrapati sambhaji maharaj and chatrapati udyan raje bhonsale said on movie you'll come to know.. because of wrongly portraying characters and scenes without verifying from historical experts and chatrapati family group members they have strongly opposed to it.

And even if we read historical books written by very big experts you'll also come to know on the controversial scenes and and action drama shown in it.

All good but Shivaji casting not suited to the actor. Remaining castings are appropriate and their acting. Some newbie acting are lame. Locations are proper. Shivaji actor must do some body work and grace. His look is not suited to Shivaji. He should not be cast as Shivaji even though he is acclaimed actor. Sharad kelkar is the most suited to the character in entire movie. Movie length, as usual in Indian movies, is the problem. He did the excellent lead role. I wish he'll get more and more better movies in future. Subhod may be good actor but he have limitations to suit some characters such as Shivaji.

Extremely inaccurate movie in terms of History.

All 300 were completely filled with blood. They killed about 6000 . Even Chatrapati Shivaji Raje had to face 2000 before reaching the fort to sound the cannon.

Even with a lower budget Pawan Khind was so good.

This director should learn a bit of spirituality, to understand Dnandev Tukaram and how Raje was spiritual to get the sword Bhavani from Devi Bhavani. He is like God not because of his speech, but his selfless actions and his vision. The dialogues make both Baji Prabhu and Raje seem like a biggot. He was a like Chandra Gupta with Chanakya.

The unnecessary (paanchat) dialogues everywhere, shows him very ordinary. Even Baji Prabhu seems ordinary because of the direction even though what they did was extraordinary.