अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंThe narrative unfolds in the 14th Century amidst the days of the Holy Roman Empire where Europe's nations fiercely vie for supremacy and the ambitious Austrians, desiring more land, encroach... सभी पढ़ेंThe narrative unfolds in the 14th Century amidst the days of the Holy Roman Empire where Europe's nations fiercely vie for supremacy and the ambitious Austrians, desiring more land, encroach upon Switzerland, a serene and pastoral nation.The narrative unfolds in the 14th Century amidst the days of the Holy Roman Empire where Europe's nations fiercely vie for supremacy and the ambitious Austrians, desiring more land, encroach upon Switzerland, a serene and pastoral nation.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
सारांश
Reviewers say 'William Tell' is lauded for its strong performances, stunning cinematography, and historical authenticity. The narrative of rebellion against tyranny resonates, though dialogue and pacing receive mixed feedback. Some find the script theatrical, and the middle section drags. Historical accuracy and character portrayals are debated. Despite these issues, the film's epic scope and emotional depth make it a compelling historical drama.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
So... I came for arrows and rebellion.
I stayed for moody stares and dramatic cloak-swishing. And I left wondering: was this a freedom fighter or a medieval therapist with anger issues?
Claes Bang plays William Tell like he's auditioning to be the next Batman - dark, brooding, and emotionally constipated. The man shoots maybe one arrow, but delivers about 947 intense silences. Respect.
Ben Kingsley shows up and casually steals every scene with the smug energy of someone who knows this isn't going to win any awards - and doesn't care. Icon.
Highlights: Gorgeous Swiss mountains.
Enough slow-motion stares to power a shampoo commercial.
Historical drama that thinks it's Shakespeare but sometimes feels more like a LARP gone rogue.
Lowlights: Pacing so slow, I checked my pulse. Twice.
A hero with all the charisma of a wet log.
Dialogue so dramatic, it circles back to being hilarious.
Bottom line: It's not a bad movie. It's just very committed to being serious... even when it really shouldn't be. Like wearing full armor to a garden party.
Watch it with wine. Or snacks. Or while folding laundry. You won't miss much if you blink - or nap.
I stayed for moody stares and dramatic cloak-swishing. And I left wondering: was this a freedom fighter or a medieval therapist with anger issues?
Claes Bang plays William Tell like he's auditioning to be the next Batman - dark, brooding, and emotionally constipated. The man shoots maybe one arrow, but delivers about 947 intense silences. Respect.
Ben Kingsley shows up and casually steals every scene with the smug energy of someone who knows this isn't going to win any awards - and doesn't care. Icon.
Highlights: Gorgeous Swiss mountains.
Enough slow-motion stares to power a shampoo commercial.
Historical drama that thinks it's Shakespeare but sometimes feels more like a LARP gone rogue.
Lowlights: Pacing so slow, I checked my pulse. Twice.
A hero with all the charisma of a wet log.
Dialogue so dramatic, it circles back to being hilarious.
Bottom line: It's not a bad movie. It's just very committed to being serious... even when it really shouldn't be. Like wearing full armor to a garden party.
Watch it with wine. Or snacks. Or while folding laundry. You won't miss much if you blink - or nap.
An adaptation of Friedrich Schiller's 1804 play of "Wilhelm Tell" and story of the Swiss struggle for independence. Where an act of oppression, followed by unnecessary wrongdoing sparks a response that sets off a chain of events that lead to rebellion. Wilhelm Tell, master of the crossbow, involved in a conflict he would have rather not be a part of..
Visually, the film delivers beautiful landscape shots and a believable period piece, with a nicely-colored and dynamic cinematography and an excellent production! Not to mention a rather large cast of actors that present the material with strong performances.
I've read questioning of the "dialogue", but as a foreigner, I found it was easy to follow at all times and no line particularly annoying or useless.
But.. despite this strong execution, the script lacks surprises, intrigue and excitement. Making the predictable plot an expected retelling of this known story.
Don't get me wrong, it is quite solid and engaging enough.. but for 2-hour film that feels a tad long, I expected something more. It's not what I wanted it to be, but I would recommend it still to those interested and those not familiar with the famous character.
Visually, the film delivers beautiful landscape shots and a believable period piece, with a nicely-colored and dynamic cinematography and an excellent production! Not to mention a rather large cast of actors that present the material with strong performances.
I've read questioning of the "dialogue", but as a foreigner, I found it was easy to follow at all times and no line particularly annoying or useless.
But.. despite this strong execution, the script lacks surprises, intrigue and excitement. Making the predictable plot an expected retelling of this known story.
Don't get me wrong, it is quite solid and engaging enough.. but for 2-hour film that feels a tad long, I expected something more. It's not what I wanted it to be, but I would recommend it still to those interested and those not familiar with the famous character.
Had to turn it off after so many sea voyages which appeared to be made out as a if they were on the North Sea. Between Switzerland and Austria? Awful. While this was dreadful and mind numbing even as a bit of background noise it became too much to cope with. Not sure why reviews have to be so long so again I'll just say don't bother. Walk your dog for the 5th time today go to the toilet, even if you don't need to. You can read the ingredients on the shampoo bottle, It'll be more entertaining even if you know them word for word. Then move onto the shower gell. Enough words almost now. It's awful cheers.
I watched the world premiere of William Tell at the Toronto International Film Festival (2024).
The presenter of the festival had said before the movie, "they don't make movies like this anymore". I assumed that was a positive thing.
Unfortunately, it really wasn't. The biggest issue of the movie was the language used.
This is a 14th-century period piece that involved the Swiss and Austrians. But for whatever reason the dialogue was written in something that sounded like a high-schooler's approximation of Victorian English.
According to the director, he wrote the dialogue to have language unique to the film. Maybe to assist in some sense of believability within this world. Instead the film was often hard to follow. Character motivations were lost in the flowery, disjointed language.
That being said - the cast did their absolute best with the film. Golshifteh Farahani, Connor Swindells, Rafe Spall, and Ellie Bamber were standouts.
Don't go to see the film for Ben Kingsley - he was barely in it and his performance felt completely phoned in.
If you're okay with 2-hours of mindlessness as you watch beautiful scenery and cool fight scenes - I think there is enough to enjoy.
The movie set up a sequel. I do hope it can be made, and some changes to how dialogue and character interactions are done will be made.
The presenter of the festival had said before the movie, "they don't make movies like this anymore". I assumed that was a positive thing.
Unfortunately, it really wasn't. The biggest issue of the movie was the language used.
This is a 14th-century period piece that involved the Swiss and Austrians. But for whatever reason the dialogue was written in something that sounded like a high-schooler's approximation of Victorian English.
According to the director, he wrote the dialogue to have language unique to the film. Maybe to assist in some sense of believability within this world. Instead the film was often hard to follow. Character motivations were lost in the flowery, disjointed language.
That being said - the cast did their absolute best with the film. Golshifteh Farahani, Connor Swindells, Rafe Spall, and Ellie Bamber were standouts.
Don't go to see the film for Ben Kingsley - he was barely in it and his performance felt completely phoned in.
If you're okay with 2-hours of mindlessness as you watch beautiful scenery and cool fight scenes - I think there is enough to enjoy.
The movie set up a sequel. I do hope it can be made, and some changes to how dialogue and character interactions are done will be made.
To all the naysayers sharpening their quills, let's get real: William Tell isn't trying to be Braveheart 2.0 (and thank goodness-no one needs another freedom speech in blue face paint). Instead, this film carves out its own niche with a crossbow and a wink.
Sure, some critics are acting like Tell missed the apple and shot their popcorn instead. But let's give credit where it's due: Claes Bang brings more charisma to the Swiss Alps than Mel Gibson brought to the Scottish Highlands. The villains are deliciously over-the-top-Ben Kingsley could probably glare a mountain goat into submission-and the scenery is so gorgeous you'll want to book a flight to Switzerland (or at least Google it).
Is it perfect? No. But neither is Braveheart (historical accuracy, anyone?). If you're looking for a fun, action-packed legend with a dash of heart and a lot less kilt, William Tell hits the mark. So loosen up, critics-sometimes a movie is just a good time, not a history lesson or a revolution.
Let me know if you want more zingers or specific references!
Sure, some critics are acting like Tell missed the apple and shot their popcorn instead. But let's give credit where it's due: Claes Bang brings more charisma to the Swiss Alps than Mel Gibson brought to the Scottish Highlands. The villains are deliciously over-the-top-Ben Kingsley could probably glare a mountain goat into submission-and the scenery is so gorgeous you'll want to book a flight to Switzerland (or at least Google it).
Is it perfect? No. But neither is Braveheart (historical accuracy, anyone?). If you're looking for a fun, action-packed legend with a dash of heart and a lot less kilt, William Tell hits the mark. So loosen up, critics-sometimes a movie is just a good time, not a history lesson or a revolution.
Let me know if you want more zingers or specific references!
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाDespite being a national hero in Switzerland, there is no concrete historical evidence that William Tell ever existed.
The earliest written account of the story appears in a 15th-century chronicle called the "White Book of Sarnen", more than a century after the events are supposed to have taken place.
Furthermore, the act of the hero shooting an apple from his son's head stems from the saga of Toko, who was a servant of the Danish King Harald Bluetooth, who died in 985. Likewise, Toko's story was written down more than two hundred years later, in the epic tale "Gesta Danorum".
Many historians view William Tell as a purely legendary figure, though his story was deeply embedded in Swiss national identity by the time of its writing.
- गूफ़The various castles are shown in their modern forms. Specifically, they have a large number of windows. These were all cut several centuries after the period in which the story is set, when castles were no longer required to be fortresses.
- कनेक्शनVersion of Guillaume Tell et le clown (1898)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is William Tell?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Guillermo Tell
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $43,088
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $26,554
- 6 अप्रैल 2025
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $6,80,624
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 14 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें