एक युवा नवविवाहिता अपने पति की पारिवारिक संपत्ति पर जाती है, जहां उसे उसके पति की पहली पत्नी रेबेका की छाया से जूझना पड़ता है जिसकी विरासत उसकी मृत्यु के बाद भी लंबे समय तक घर में अपना असर द... सभी पढ़ेंएक युवा नवविवाहिता अपने पति की पारिवारिक संपत्ति पर जाती है, जहां उसे उसके पति की पहली पत्नी रेबेका की छाया से जूझना पड़ता है जिसकी विरासत उसकी मृत्यु के बाद भी लंबे समय तक घर में अपना असर दिखाती है.एक युवा नवविवाहिता अपने पति की पारिवारिक संपत्ति पर जाती है, जहां उसे उसके पति की पहली पत्नी रेबेका की छाया से जूझना पड़ता है जिसकी विरासत उसकी मृत्यु के बाद भी लंबे समय तक घर में अपना असर दिखाती है.
- 1 BAFTA अवार्ड के लिए नामांकित
- 1 जीत और कुल 3 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The first half was good, but the second half is when everything started to fall apart for me.
Without revealing too much, in the second half, especially towards the end (like the last half hour), the dialogue turned awkward & inconsistent. The events including significant revelations were RUSHED so much that there was no build up to them nor enough time to let them sink in before moving on to the next scene. The reactions to some news or events within the plot were dull & lacked sincerity and passion.
The editing for those scenes didn't help either. It just kept jumping too fast to the next scene or cut to a different frame in a different location in the middle of a revealing conversation. That's when they lost me. The emotional connection I wanted to feel for the characters kept being interrupted.
Though I still kept an open mind and was hoping I'll be pleasantly surprised that I'll love this movie by the end of it, but unfortunately, it just kept going the same kind of direction till the movie was over.
I've been looking forward to this, and even with my expectations being reasonable and not too high, I still didn't get what I wanted.
And just to be clear, I'm not comparing this to Hitchcock's version. In fact, I've never even seen it. So this is solely based on the execution of the story in this specific movie. It simply didn't do it for me.
First off the film looks great especially the scenes in France and the story is good but that is the source materials fault not anyone involved with this film.
I thought it was pretty bland apart from the points above. The characters were just so blah. I literally cared more about Clarice the maid than the lead characters. She seemed nice which is at least an adjective, I can't really think of any adjectives to describe Mr and Mrs de Winters. So that tells you something.
I was really looking forward to the costumes too but for the most part I was let down. They stuck Mrs de Winter in like dumpy hats and cardigans that you could go and pick up from H & M. I don't understand this choice. In the Hitchcock film they give her interesting dresses and stylish tops. I was so confused.
I also don't believe the reviews that say this captures old Hollywood. I didn't feel it, it 100% felt like a 2020 film. If you want a old Hollywood movie just go and watch one.
I would honestly skip it, it was pretty confused. The first chunk of the movie felt like full romance but then it shifts into like a boring drama then it's all like Frankensteined together with horror tropes like "jump scares". It had no point of view.
I did raise an eyebrow when I heard that Armie Hammer had been cast as Maxim, but I felt he did a decent job, it gives me hope for his upcoming part in Death on the Nile.
The standout for me was Kristin Scott Thomas, she was a fearsome Mrs Danvers, very impressive.
The film itself, very stylish, and had some good moments. If I'm totally honest, I was a tad disappointed, I think the pacing was a bit off, it perhaps felt a bit rushed at the ending.
A few reviewers calling for no remakes, and yes the 1940 adaptation is the ultimate, but come on, many of us love seeing a retelling. However, if you haven't seen the adaptation with Olivier and Fontaine, I urge you to, it captures the atmosphere beautifully.
Overall, it's a good watch, maybe it's the sinister atmosphere that's perhaps lacking. 6/10.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाJust as in the book and the previous movie adaptation, Rebecca (1940) by Alfred Hitchcock, the new Mrs De Winter is never given either a first name or maiden name, whilst the late Mrs De Winter is constantly referred to by hers.
- गूफ़(at around 1h 35 mins) Jack Favell blackmails Maxim with a note allegedly containing an invitation from Rebecca to meet up on the night of her death. However, the note is undated, so there is nothing that links it to the events of that particular day.
- भाव
[first lines]
Mrs. de Winter: [narrating] Last night I dreamt I went to Manderley again. I dreamt that where our drive once lay, a dark and tortured jungle grew. Nature had come into her own and yet the house still stood. Manderley. Secretive and silent as it had always been. Risen from the dead. Like all dreamers, I was allowed to pass through my memory. Spanning the years like a bridge. Back to that summer in Monte Carlo when I knew nothing and had no prospects.
- साउंडट्रैकHungarian Dance No. 6
Written by Johannes Brahms
Arranged by Joseph Joachim
Performed by Henri Marteau
Courtesy of Deutsche Grammophone GmbH
Under licence from Universal Music Operations Ltd
टॉप पसंद
- How long is Rebecca?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Rebeca
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $1,80,00,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 3 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1