IMDb रेटिंग
6.2/10
8.6 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
चार्ल्स डिकेंस की पंथ क्रिसमस कहानी का एक अलौकिक, समय-यात्रा, संगीत रूपांतरण<>चार्ल्स डिकेंस की पंथ क्रिसमस कहानी का एक अलौकिक, समय-यात्रा, संगीत रूपांतरण<>चार्ल्स डिकेंस की पंथ क्रिसमस कहानी का एक अलौकिक, समय-यात्रा, संगीत रूपांतरण<>
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 2 कुल नामांकन
Luke Evans
- Scrooge
- (वॉइस)
Olivia Colman
- Past
- (वॉइस)
Johnny Flynn
- Bob Cratchit
- (वॉइस)
- …
Fra Fee
- Harry Huffman
- (वॉइस)
Giles Terera
- Tom Jenkins
- (वॉइस)
James Cosmo
- Mr Fezziwig
- (वॉइस)
Oliver Jenkins
- Tiny Tim
- (वॉइस)
Rupert Turnbull
- Tiny Tim
- (वॉइस)
Zaris-Angel Hator
- Beryl
- (वॉइस)
Jemima Newman
- Jen Scrooge
- (वॉइस)
- (as Jemima Lucy Newman)
Homer Todiwala
- Tamal
- (वॉइस)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The animation and cinematography in this movie is very good. The way they frame the pictures and what they include and exclude top notch.
Is the story the same...... essentially. But it leaves a lot to be desired since the essential cues created by Charles Dickens are all but completely void. This is like reading "The Message" bible - a paraphrase - rather than the word for word text itself. A pity because Dicken's original wording is immaculate. There's a reason that his book sold so well and touched so many, because they way he wrote it only added to the story and made it moreso.
The songs? Okay. Nice.
The length? Shouldn't really be a factor when telling a good story, but... fine.
The animators made everyone look like a Ken or Barbie Doll - painting a picture that is devoid of reality. But it was made for kids. A sort of introduction to "A Christmas Carol" for children who are not yet old enough to think.
There was backstory added (which I won't divulge) that was NOT part of the original, that DID add to the story and lend a little push to the original story. This story is warmer than the original story's. A "feel-good" kiddie version.
All in all, I like it. Not sure if it will be added to collection thought. Have let my Wife, the "Boss", give her opinion first.
It was NOT an "excellent" movie, but it sure blew away the Jim Carrey version (that was pure rubbish)!!!
Is the story the same...... essentially. But it leaves a lot to be desired since the essential cues created by Charles Dickens are all but completely void. This is like reading "The Message" bible - a paraphrase - rather than the word for word text itself. A pity because Dicken's original wording is immaculate. There's a reason that his book sold so well and touched so many, because they way he wrote it only added to the story and made it moreso.
The songs? Okay. Nice.
The length? Shouldn't really be a factor when telling a good story, but... fine.
The animators made everyone look like a Ken or Barbie Doll - painting a picture that is devoid of reality. But it was made for kids. A sort of introduction to "A Christmas Carol" for children who are not yet old enough to think.
There was backstory added (which I won't divulge) that was NOT part of the original, that DID add to the story and lend a little push to the original story. This story is warmer than the original story's. A "feel-good" kiddie version.
All in all, I like it. Not sure if it will be added to collection thought. Have let my Wife, the "Boss", give her opinion first.
It was NOT an "excellent" movie, but it sure blew away the Jim Carrey version (that was pure rubbish)!!!
There have been over 100 versions of this story on film and TV in the last 100 years or so.
This one, while competently made, adds nothing to the canon.
It is technically well enough done and has some fine glitz and glitter, but the plot is truncated to the point of abandonment; the character development isn't; the songs, with some exceptions are lifeless and listless.
How can I say this: even Tiny Tim comes off as a two-minute afterthought.
It's not that the story can't abide restaging. The best may still be the 1951 Alistair Sim, but the 1992 Muppet version was fresh and winning, and eve last month's Spirited gave us some pizzaz and some energy.
Scrooge: A Christmas Carol 2022, while not bad, per se, was as unnecessary a project as I can remember.
This one, while competently made, adds nothing to the canon.
It is technically well enough done and has some fine glitz and glitter, but the plot is truncated to the point of abandonment; the character development isn't; the songs, with some exceptions are lifeless and listless.
How can I say this: even Tiny Tim comes off as a two-minute afterthought.
It's not that the story can't abide restaging. The best may still be the 1951 Alistair Sim, but the 1992 Muppet version was fresh and winning, and eve last month's Spirited gave us some pizzaz and some energy.
Scrooge: A Christmas Carol 2022, while not bad, per se, was as unnecessary a project as I can remember.
Yet another film transposition of one of the most beautiful and iconic Christmas stories of all time and I can say by heart that this is the ugliest and least faithful of all, even if the film itself is not bad but when compared to all the others done so far this is the worst done. The main problems of the film are two, one is the dog that has absolutely nothing to do with it and is just annoying for most of the film and the other is the fact that the film is too childish, denaturing the more adult part of the original work in favor of an audience of small children, thus taking away a lot from the original teaching of history to make it more likeable.
Did we need another A Christmas Carol film? No, probably not.
Was this worth it? Just for Luke Evans vocals alone I'd 100% say yes. Some of the songs were spectacular.
The animation was great, with exciting new imaginations of scenes. I think it was a successful modernisation of an over saturated film and will definitely get younger kids enjoying it, but maybe not enough to stand out alone if it wasn't a musical. There wasn't enough emphasis on some of the other characters stories, so you don't build much of an emotional connection with them. Some of the accents were pretty bad, and parts of the original script and wording is lost, which is important to its essence.
Despite that, it's enjoyable, and after all it's a children's film. I will be going back to replay Luke Evan's singing solos on repeat.
Was this worth it? Just for Luke Evans vocals alone I'd 100% say yes. Some of the songs were spectacular.
The animation was great, with exciting new imaginations of scenes. I think it was a successful modernisation of an over saturated film and will definitely get younger kids enjoying it, but maybe not enough to stand out alone if it wasn't a musical. There wasn't enough emphasis on some of the other characters stories, so you don't build much of an emotional connection with them. Some of the accents were pretty bad, and parts of the original script and wording is lost, which is important to its essence.
Despite that, it's enjoyable, and after all it's a children's film. I will be going back to replay Luke Evan's singing solos on repeat.
Homage to Roald Neame version of Scrooge, it is , for CGI more, a seductive animation inspired by the classic novel. And, sure imaginative at whole, reminding the good tastes of the fascinations specific to childhood.
I like Prudence , against the strange idea about a Scrooge as owner of a pet, I admire the scene about connection , in past, between Robert Cratchit and Ebenezer, like the inspired option for Jonathan Pryce for ghost of Jacob Marley, remembering the old beautiful work of Alec Guinness in the original version.
It is unfair to critic it . First, because it is a new demonstration of hard work with a not significant budget and about large possibilities offered by technology today. Second, because i am too old for critics. My favorit options are in the past . And this correct , imaginative, seductive Scrooge, like a noble hommage to work for 1970 Scrooge, has the beautiful virtue to remind, in fair manner,the splendid art of leslie bricusse.
I like Prudence , against the strange idea about a Scrooge as owner of a pet, I admire the scene about connection , in past, between Robert Cratchit and Ebenezer, like the inspired option for Jonathan Pryce for ghost of Jacob Marley, remembering the old beautiful work of Alec Guinness in the original version.
It is unfair to critic it . First, because it is a new demonstration of hard work with a not significant budget and about large possibilities offered by technology today. Second, because i am too old for critics. My favorit options are in the past . And this correct , imaginative, seductive Scrooge, like a noble hommage to work for 1970 Scrooge, has the beautiful virtue to remind, in fair manner,the splendid art of leslie bricusse.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThis is an animated version of Scrooge (1970) released in 1970 with Albert Finney as Scrooge. Six songs from the original version were redone and used in the animated version, as well, "Christmas Children", "I Like Life", "Happiness", "The Beautiful Day", "Thank You Very Much", and "I'll Begin Again". However, "Christmas Children", which usually plays at the start of the story, is only heard during the end credits. The soundtrack release places the songs in the correct order.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Remembering the True Batman (2022)
- साउंडट्रैकI Love Christmas
Performed by Fra Fee
Music & lyrics by Leslie Bricusse
Published by Stage & Screen LTD, 2021
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Scrooge: A Christmas Carol?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Scrooge: Cuento de Navidad
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 36 मि(96 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें