IMDb रेटिंग
4.7/10
2.1 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA veteran postman finds his beliefs challenged after he enters a TV talent show competition.A veteran postman finds his beliefs challenged after he enters a TV talent show competition.A veteran postman finds his beliefs challenged after he enters a TV talent show competition.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
Jim Broadbent
- CEO
- (वॉइस)
Rupert Grint
- Josh
- (वॉइस)
David Tennant
- Wilf
- (वॉइस)
Ronan Keating
- Postman Pat
- (गाने की आवाज)
T.J. Ramini
- Ben Taylor
- (वॉइस)
Brian George
- Ajay Bains
- (वॉइस)
Jo Wyatt
- Meera Bains
- (वॉइस)
Enn Reitel
- PC Arthur Selby
- (वॉइस)
- …
Jane Carr
- Mrs. Goggins
- (वॉइस)
- …
Dan Hildebrand
- Ted Glenn
- (वॉइस)
Jacob Witkin
- George Lancaster
- (वॉइस)
- …
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This was a very good film with Humor for children and adults, however whilst my Son enjoyed the film there were some tears as some of the scenes were I feel quite frightening for the Target audience and would say a Parental Guidance Certificate would be more appropriate than a U. Given that my son has never been particularly sensitive I was somewhat surprised
That said it had a half decent story line and I have come away with a new found love for Jess the cat!
David Tennant's character was particularly amusing to me and It was good to see that the parents and guardians have been greatly considered.
That said it had a half decent story line and I have come away with a new found love for Jess the cat!
David Tennant's character was particularly amusing to me and It was good to see that the parents and guardians have been greatly considered.
As a parent who can enjoy children's animations, this was a disappointment to say the least. I think the writers completely missed an opportunity to make a kids film that could've been endearing, funny, and true to the original TV series. The characters voices were not right, and I think this was mainly because bringing in big name actors to voice was more important than delivering a product- sorry film - to its fans.
The story started quite promising, (a huge smile on my children's face during the opening credits) but very quickly diverted in a direction that just didn't tie in with the whole film. The introduction of a mainstream 'talent' show was unnecessary and didn't work,(in my opinion) and was just far removed from what a child watching would expect - not all children watch British talent shows - and if this was introduced only to make fun of Simon Cowell, then thats just poor writing. All the characters had tiny quirky moments, but it was sporadic throughout, and lost in amongst the poor storyline. Characters such as Ted Glen didn't get much air time, when he could've added a funny slapstick element to it all.
Very disappointed by the this, a completely lost opportunity....
The story started quite promising, (a huge smile on my children's face during the opening credits) but very quickly diverted in a direction that just didn't tie in with the whole film. The introduction of a mainstream 'talent' show was unnecessary and didn't work,(in my opinion) and was just far removed from what a child watching would expect - not all children watch British talent shows - and if this was introduced only to make fun of Simon Cowell, then thats just poor writing. All the characters had tiny quirky moments, but it was sporadic throughout, and lost in amongst the poor storyline. Characters such as Ted Glen didn't get much air time, when he could've added a funny slapstick element to it all.
Very disappointed by the this, a completely lost opportunity....
Just been to see this with my 2 year old. Didn't have any real expectations, I was just hoping my little girl would enjoy the film. However I was very much surprised. Firstly the negative stuff: The animation wasn't very good. The CGI looked a little cheap. Also It would have been good if they could have used the same voices for the main characters. Saying that these things things spoil the film. The makers of the film have really thought of the adults who will be seeing this film with their little ones. Simon Cowbell is a good example. A miserable headhunter, hosting a talent show. He even wore clothes very much similar to a certain person with a similar name. The plot wasn't anything new, but as it's for very little children that can be forgiven. My two year old was laughing and clapping to the film.
However their are a few scenes that might scare some children.
Above all a great young children's film that parents will enjoy watching too.
However their are a few scenes that might scare some children.
Above all a great young children's film that parents will enjoy watching too.
I saw this movie with my 4 year old, his first real movie experience, and a disappointing one. At home he loves the postman pat short movies so he was excited to go and see this one. Now he is an always happy kind of guy and sat through the movie. But the excitement was quickly gone I noticed.
Simply too much references to adult-world kind of things like ... got talent, work problems, etc etc that are outside his world. It simply lasted too long.
At the end he was more interested in the different flavors popcorn then the movie. Too bad, missed opportunity
Simply too much references to adult-world kind of things like ... got talent, work problems, etc etc that are outside his world. It simply lasted too long.
At the end he was more interested in the different flavors popcorn then the movie. Too bad, missed opportunity
I'll admit, for the first half-hour, I really didn't see what was so bad about this film. The first little while felt like an episode of the series and even the talent show story line at least made sense as Pat was doing it for his wife and not for himself, and Pat's always been selfless so that was great. I was already a little sceptical when they revealed the whole Robot Pat thing, but when it escalated into a bigger plot, this was where the movie almost lost me. I was able to accept the existence of cellphones and a PS Vita, of all things, in the world of Postman Pat, but the evil robot thing really shouldn't be connected to this.
And before you say anything, yes, I know movies connected to cartoon shows usually try to differentiate themselves from their source material. And honestly, I think the talent show plot was good enough. You could have had the fame and attention get to Pat's head only for him to learn a lesson in the end and that would have been fine. As if that's not enough, we also get a terminator reference and, yeah, is this really Postman Pat?
However, in spite of all of this, I found this strangely enjoyable, but more as its own stand-alone sort of thing. Like Tom and Jerry the movie, I don't really like this as something connected to its respective series but rather its own entity. Every time the movie did something to make me groan, like when the villain revealed his evil plan before it was too late for Pat to stop him and, probably the most painful of all, Jess not being able to tell the difference between his beloved owner and a robot, it managed to pull me back with either a decent joke or something equally entertaining.
All-in-all, I can see why a lot of Pat fans don't like this movie. After the first half-hour, it starts to lose a lot of its charm in favour for something I'd accept in any other animated film, but I still found it strangely entertaining. I can't recommend it, really, but it's a guilty pleasure for me.
And before you say anything, yes, I know movies connected to cartoon shows usually try to differentiate themselves from their source material. And honestly, I think the talent show plot was good enough. You could have had the fame and attention get to Pat's head only for him to learn a lesson in the end and that would have been fine. As if that's not enough, we also get a terminator reference and, yeah, is this really Postman Pat?
However, in spite of all of this, I found this strangely enjoyable, but more as its own stand-alone sort of thing. Like Tom and Jerry the movie, I don't really like this as something connected to its respective series but rather its own entity. Every time the movie did something to make me groan, like when the villain revealed his evil plan before it was too late for Pat to stop him and, probably the most painful of all, Jess not being able to tell the difference between his beloved owner and a robot, it managed to pull me back with either a decent joke or something equally entertaining.
All-in-all, I can see why a lot of Pat fans don't like this movie. After the first half-hour, it starts to lose a lot of its charm in favour for something I'd accept in any other animated film, but I still found it strangely entertaining. I can't recommend it, really, but it's a guilty pleasure for me.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAs robot pat malfunctions he sings "Daisy Daisy" this is a tribute to HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey, as he was unplugged, HAL 9000 sang "Daisy Bell" .
The original reason is that in 1961, the IBM 7094, one of the the earliest and largest mainframe machines developed by IBM, became the first computer to sing, and the tune it warbled was "Daisy Bell."
- भाव
Not Robot B3: Delivery! Delivery, old woman! Delivery!
- साउंडट्रैकPlease Mr Postman
Written by Robert Bateman (uncredited), Brian Holland (uncredited), Georgia Dobbins (uncredited), William Garrett (uncredited) and Freddie Gorman (uncredited)
Performed by The Saturdays
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Postman Pat: The Movie?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $1,519
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $1,254
- 29 जून 2014
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $71,02,455
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 28 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें