Covjek koji nije mogao sutjeti

The Man Who Could Not Remain Silent tries to tackle a powerful historical event but collapses under the weight of its own self-importance. The film's direction is painfully heavy-handed, with every frame screaming for attention instead of letting the story speak for itself. The dialogue is stilted and often feels like a lecture rather than natural human interaction, robbing the characters of depth and authenticity.

While the subject matter is undeniably significant, the film fails to convey the emotional weight it demands, relying on clichés and oversimplified moralizing. At just 13 minutes, it somehow manages to feel both rushed and overly drawn out, lacking the balance necessary to make its brief runtime impactful.

What should have been a poignant meditation on courage and complicity comes off as hollow and contrived. It's a missed opportunity that, despite its lofty intentions, leaves the audience feeling more exasperated than moved.

Intense story about war time and legitimation of abuse and reaction about rights of the other , ignoring the risks.

A train, an army presumed check , a young man without ID papers and the simple story of survive of other .

The atmosphere is the main trait and, for older viewers, the remind of episodes presented by media, at the first part of 1990 decade, from Yugoslavian space.

The portrait of Dragan, proposed by Goran Bogdan , is one of basic essential virtues of film. The interest of militaries is to identify Muslims - this explains the familiar question in Serbian culture, about the saint patron of family. But the heart is the sacrifice of captain for save the young man . And the brutality of military, like his lie .

In short, intense story for profound remind of a version of evil never dead.

As a Bosnian, A Man Who Couldn't Remain Silent struck me on a profoundly personal level. The film captures emotions so raw and real that they stay with you long after the credits roll. The cinematography is intimate yet powerful, with every frame carefully composed to reflect the weight of the story. The sound design, subtle but deeply immersive, adds another layer to the experience-every silence, every echo feels intentional and haunting.

What truly touched me was the authenticity of the emotions. The film doesn't just tell a story; it makes you feel it. The pain, the resilience, the unspoken words-it's all there, beautifully portrayed through nuanced performances and a gripping atmosphere. Unfortunately, the English translation loses many of the local anecdotes that give the film its depth and authenticity, which is a shame because these details are what make it so uniquely powerful.

I'm amazed at how a short film can leave such a lasting impression. In just a brief runtime, it delivers an emotional punch stronger than many full-length features. A must-watch for those who appreciate cinema that speaks from the heart.

Hearing that this short film won the Palme d'Or immediately piqued my interest. After watching the director's brief video introduction, my curiosity grew even more. The film is based on a true story that unfolded over 20 minutes, yet the movie itself runs for only 13 minutes. I believe they missed an opportunity by not matching the film's duration to the real event, which could have heightened the tension and allowed us to experience the emotions more deeply.

The topic of the film is extremely important and more relevant than ever, resonating with the current social and political climate. It's a powerful reminder of the real-world issues we face today, making it not just a piece of entertainment, but also a critical conversation starter. The cinematography is stunning, and the cast delivers exceptional performances. However, the sound mixing could have been better; there were moments where the sound had the potential to elevate the film to another level. Despite this, the film succeeds in leaving a lasting impact, both visually and emotionally.

Road to the Oscars 2025: This is nominated for one Oscar best short film.

This one I didn´t know much about going in and it was a short that send me down a rabbit hole to understand it fully. Not that it is hard to understand, but it depicts a historical time and war I simply did not know much about. It is always nice to be challenged and asked to know more, but this is a short where you need to know a little bit about the Balkan war to really let it hit. It is still impactful and relevant to think about in today's international climate, but as a history drama on its own it needs a little context.

A train is stopped looking for anyone believing in the wrong god. A man is hiding with no papers to show.

I really liked the cinematography here. It is in this old claustrophobic train and it definitely works as intended, only adding to the tension in the short. No where to hide or run to.

Ad mentioned, you need to know your history a little bit to make the short really land. It is not holding your hand, assuming you know why these men are doing the atrocities they are. After reading a bit about the Balkan wars, it is sad to see countries hunting down each other like this. And also as mentioned it is something that rings out even if you understand the context or not as ethnic hunts still persist to this day. It is always nice having a short shining a light on something you don´t really know much about, making you learn more.

This is a rather plotless shorty though. Not much happens and it is primarily waiting for the confrontation, but with a rather good use of tension.

This was a good short and one shining a light on a part of history that is interesting to read about. It might have needed a bit more in terms of its plot though.

Oscar predictions: I think this is the weakest of the 3 shorts I have watched in the category. Doesn't make it bad, but weaker compared to I´m not a robot(2023) or A lien(2023). It is also not really pushing an academy agenda.