Tillsammans 99

Had some hopes for this one since I really enjoyed the first one. Despite all the good actors this was a real sleeping pill and felt like it was 4 hours long. Just wanted it to end. Forced my self to some mercy laughs a couple of times just because when it tried to be funny i wasnt, so I felt sorry for the actors and laughed anyway, akward. Probably worst film I've seen since Ang Lee's The Hulk. So if you are one of those who thinks its exiting to watch paint dry, just do that instead, Save your money, your well-beeing and your time. Also, my wife thought it was bad to, so now you know it is!!

This is is a textbook example of how not to do a sequel. It squanders the potential of its premise and cast with bad acting and a storyline that bewilders more than it entertains.

This film serves as a reminder that a successful follow-up requires more than just riding on the coattails of its predecessors-it needs a heart, something Tilsammans 99 sorely lacks. Fans of the original would do well to temper their expectations or perhaps skip this installment altogether, lest they tarnish their memories of a the first installment.

Moreover, the sequel fails to capture the original's charm and depth, coming off as a hollow imitation. Where its predecessor skillfully balanced action, character development, and thematic depth, "tillsammans 99" leans too heavily into spectacle without the substance to back it up. It's a classic case of style over substance, with flashy visuals and action sequences that momentarily dazzle but ultimately leave the viewer feeling empty.

After the fantastic Together (2000) that I gave an 8, Moodyson returns with this sleeping pill of a sequel. It would seem there is nothing interesting that can be said about these people as Moodyson didn't bother to come up with much of a story and instead focuses the energy into actor experimentation that goes nowhere neither revealing any actor skills nor depth of anything.

Everything feels like a second thought and scenes are like short films very loosely connected to each other. There's a framing timeline but it has no real meaning. I just wish he would had been quiet and hadn't made this pile of crap.

Unfortunately there have been signs in other films he's made that he's not as skilled as he tell himself as do some of his apologists that thinks he could do nothing bad. This is worse than bad. This is boring. Bye Lukas.

This sequel is for people who get Lukas Moodysson, and who understands and entertains the dismantlement of stereotypes and enjoys seeing amazing actors, acting amazingly and being in themselves in their roles.

If you do this - you will be in for an amazing film, that simply is up there.

Touching, very funny and delicate. The way emotions can be abound, and emerge in people that meet again later in life, after sharing a part of an unique part of their life.

If you like Richard Linklater, Lars von Trier and want to enjoy their swedish equivalent - then this is the movie that'll throw you that, in a ultra swedish and warm, human manner.

Wow , how is it even possible to fail this one ? Really, there are so many different ways to do this movie thats it must basicly be harder to write a bad script than a good one

Its so simple, bring the characters back , now they are older, change their minds and after a good start with laugh and hugs let the drama begins and repeat same situations from 75 in different angles

But no ,, let it be a strange and boring manus without humour and let the viewer keep wondering in the whole movie why ,, why even bother to put toghetter this garbage

Some joker did a review with 10 stars, guess he mixed this one with the first because that one is brilliant, and loved the idea to do a new one 99 but what a disaster it went and Im not even disapointed, Im angry , what a missed oppurtunity and so much potential that throwned away , this should had been suffocated in its cradle , it should not have been borned.